Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ЯР

Channel

ЯР

@takeyar

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5,382subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001537701356
TypeChannel
Username@takeyar
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live27 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 27 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/takeyar

Growth

5,3715,3855,3787 August 2026 — 5,385 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,385 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,383 subscribers10 August 2026 — 5,377 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,374 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,371 subscribers20 August 2026 — 5,374 subscribers24 August 2026 — 5,379 subscribers27 August 2026 — 5,382 subscribers5,3827 August 202627 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 20 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,369–5,387 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
27 Aug 2026, 14:325,382+3
24 Aug 2026, 10:335,379+5
20 Aug 2026, 11:335,374+3
17 Aug 2026, 15:485,371-3
14 Aug 2026, 15:165,374-3
10 Aug 2026, 22:325,377-6
8 Aug 2026, 02:135,383-2
7 Aug 2026, 05:155,385no change
7 Aug 2026, 05:085,385first reading

Engagement

38 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
46.3%
avg views ÷ 5,382 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,490
38 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.70%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
38
of 38 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held38 (4 August 202611 August 2026)
Views total94,660
Reactions total1,610
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:23 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
9m 59s
Average length
54s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,610 reactions across 38 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤣43126.8%
👍39724.7%
23214.4%
🤡16410.2%
🔥1046.46%
🤮855.28%
😡835.16%
👏432.67%
😭311.93%
💩241.49%
🙉160.994%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 38 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,610reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 38 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 38 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @takeyar. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 38 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 August 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 12:33 UTC≈1,870 views91 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Держим кулачки за принципиальность и стойкость армянского лидера!!!! Пусть выберет Евросоюз!! ❗️Кремль дал Армении один месяц, чтобы определиться в выборе между членством в ЕАЭС и Евросоюзе — Армянские СМИ В противном случае Россия может перейти ко «второму, более жесткому этапу» ограничений, вплоть до депортации граждан Армении и ограничений полетов, которые ударят по туризму.

73👍13🤣5

10 Aug 2026, 20:42 UTC≈2,290 views74 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Ахаха))) ну главное, что не Голливуд извращенский, и не какой-то там павук!

🤮54🤣14😡51

10 Aug 2026, 20:30 UTC≈2,230 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Простое объяснение, что врага надо не супом кормить (гордясь ещё этим), а вести себя с ним так же, как он вёл себя с тобой.

😡21👏54

10 Aug 2026, 18:23 UTC≈2,300 views33 reactionsread 12 August 2026

так, ладно, хз что там с этой партией, что там запрещено или нет, что там экстремистского или нет, удалим все новости на эту тему, мало ли. позицию нашу все поняли, надеемся мозги у подписчиков тоже есть.

🤣28🤡5

10 Aug 2026, 16:42 UTC≈2,390 views30 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Все, что надо знать о публичной позиции публичных лиц на видео иноагенты, предатели, экстремисты и так далее.

🤣30

10 Aug 2026, 13:12 UTC≈2,460 views42 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Кстати, вот прекрасное, наглядное объяснение, что есть хохол, и почему они готовы и дальше царапать, получая лютых пиздюлей. На кадре Чигиринский (олигарх международного уровня), и террорист-экстремист Гордон, типичный хохол. Тот, кто еще недавно сидел в какой-то бытовке, опасаясь, что ему укоротят его длинный язык, а сейчас, получив гарантии безопасности, блатует. И посмотрите на этот диалог, он на самом деле объя

🤣32👍54🤡1

9 Aug 2026, 11:11 UTC≈2,480 views27 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Это, в том числе, к вопросу про убитых генералов. Как думаете, какое отношение к Украине у военных, реально принимающих решение по т.н. СВО? Кроме политиков, конечно же. Страх за свою жизнь? Возможно, да. А еще злость и желание мсти. Такой, самой настоящей, жесткой, испепеляющей. Просто потому что вот недавно погиб человек, который очевидно дружил со всеми теми, кто сидит в Ставке, и все они хорошо общались. А теперь

19👍8

9 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC≈2,400 views24 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Как изменяется ландшафт Украины при мудром правлении Зеленского. И ведь подумать и предположить никто не мог.

🔥17🤡4👍3

9 Aug 2026, 11:04 UTC≈2,450 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Итак, 40 дней "принуждения России к миру" как бы кончились. Мы целенаправленно особо не отсвечивали эту тему, потому что и так было понятно одно - закон больших чисел всегда задавит острые когти, способные нанести лишь царапину. ВБ в целом как работал, так и работает, бензина в стране хватает, НПЗ восстанавливаются, а за сим... ну усё. Громко конечно было, люди погибли, но в масштабах страны даже не шлепок и даже не

33👍25🔥3🤡1

9 Aug 2026, 10:00 UTC≈2,400 views20 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

Людоловы на Украине начали устраивать сафари. Хохлы, вы превратили свою страну в дерьмо и сдыхаете ради этого:

👍16🔥3🤣1

8 Aug 2026, 18:22 UTC≈2,510 views37 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Новость раз: Турция предложила украине и России объявить мораторий на военные действия — глава турецкого МИД Новость два: украина закупила у Турции 70 ракет ATACMS, 12 РСЗО M270 и десятки тысяч кассетных боеприпасов — говорится в в документах Госдепартамента США Новость три: Россия готовит комбинированную массированную атаку на киев

🔥27👍62🤡2

8 Aug 2026, 16:56 UTC≈2,510 views21 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

В целом, без разницы, кто там что дает. Сербия - это нищая страна, которая не имеет своего голоса. Окружают Сербию исключительно европейские страны, вся экономика выстроена через Европу. Наглядно можете посмотреть на карте, через сколько стран Россия может добраться своей экономикой до Сербии. Поэтому, что ей скажут, то она и будет делать. Это всё, что можно сказать на эту тему. Все эти "брат за брата", хороши, пока

🤣17😡3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 38 posts we hold for @takeyar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,103,464 of 1,621,754entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ЯР” (@takeyar), 5,382 subscribers as measured 27 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/takeyar.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.