Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

0

@takebackourlife

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

5subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001541309629
TypeChannel
Username@takebackourlife
Description0
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 3 January 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded13 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held2
On Telegramt.me/takebackourlife

Growth

58 August 2026 — 5 subscribers13 August 2026 — 5 subscribers8 August 202613 August 2026
2 measurements spanning 5 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4–6 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 03:175no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:035first reading

Engagement

12 posts held, back to 3 January 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 January 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Photos
48
Videos
1
Links
66

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Reaction mix

5 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍360.0%
240.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 5reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 3 January 2023 to 10 January 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Jan 2023, 05:56 UTC209 views2 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://www.codastory.com/authoritarian-tech/molka-digital-sex-crimes-south-korea/

2

9 Jan 2023, 11:43 UTC140 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

Photo, posted without a caption

9 Jan 2023, 11:43 UTC115 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @twitter_translatePhoto

我想说一个被遗忘的历史。 在19世纪,欧美的科学家们相信,白人之所以优于别的族裔,是因为白人的男女分别更为清晰。这些科学家甚至会研究不同人种不同性别的头骨,并声称黄种人、黑人、美洲原住民男女不分,因此不够开化,是野蛮的低等人。 也就是说,白人至上的种族主义和仇女恐同恐跨,有着非常深远的联系。 source

9 Jan 2023, 04:00 UTC118 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

#特别安全提醒 https://ngocn2.org/article/2022-12-08-set-telegram-safe/ 近日据闻多个相关白纸运动的telegram(电报)讨论群组都有管理者或成员被带走,在此特别提醒有参与白纸相关telegram讨论群组的管理者和成员可以进行如下操作: 【如果你是管理者】 你需要意识到电报讨论群组并没有加密功能,而且也容易通过各种方式被盗号或者木马攻击:另外,你需尽一切能力保护群组成员安全。 1. 你可以直接解散群组,或者先把群组成员转移到其他加密的平台,比如不需要电话号码也可以注册账号,而且有端对端加密功能的Element或者Wire上,然后再解散群组。 2. 如果你认为自己已经有足够的抵抗各种风险的能力和较强的安全防范意识,而且你的群组人数超过100人,telegram最近推出了一个隐藏群组成员的功能,超过100人的讨论群组即可使用。把telegram升级到最新版本,然后点击

👍1

6 Jan 2023, 07:54 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026

https://en.as.com/soccer/amnesty-international-ronaldo-move-to-saudi-arabia-is-part-of-sportswashing-v/

👍1

6 Jan 2023, 07:54 UTC104 viewsread 13 August 2026

國際特赦組織喊話C羅 勿成為沙國「運動洗白」宣傳工具

6 Jan 2023, 04:22 UTC85 views1 reactionsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @ngocn01

2022: Remember the Light the Young Have Shown Us https://ngocn2.org/article/2023-01-06-new-year-the-youth-en/ 本文是《2022 记住青年带来的光亮》的翻译稿,China Change将它翻译成英文版,感谢China Change的授权转载。但愿2023年,这些青年人的光亮仍照耀着我们前行。同样,正如作者在新年第一天,依然充满希望地说一声:新年快乐!并期待你们平安归来。 请帮助我们把这个翻译稿转发给更多海外的师友,祝愿大家新年平安、健康和快乐!

👍1

5 Jan 2023, 10:00 UTC116 viewsread 13 August 2026

高额彩礼:理解农村代内剥削现象的一种视角 ,性别视角下农村女性早婚的思考 作者:陶自祥 #乡村 #本土 #彩礼 #论文 “我们认为在市场经济条件下,即便因婚姻市场挤压导致妇女要价过高,在一定程度上给男性带来“娶媳妇难”的严重影响,但很大程度上在多兄弟姐妹的家庭里,儿子结婚的婚姻支付实际上都不是由父母和儿子来承担,而是被隐形地转嫁到在家庭中处于边缘地位的女儿身上,由其来承担当下高额的婚姻成本。女儿囿于在家庭内部的代内关系中先赋性的性别角色,从她出生时就被父母定位要为她的哥哥或弟弟们做出巨大的让步,不仅不能与其兄弟共同继承家庭的财产、分配家庭中的土地资源,而且她在面临整个大家庭必须确保香火不断的巨大压力时,女儿在高额彩礼的婚姻支付中被迫作出了伟大的牺牲,往往被迫早婚。”

4 Jan 2023, 11:21 UTC90 viewsread 13 August 2026
Forwarded from @picapicasocio

https://matters.news/@picapica2077/361035-性別是来區分什麼的-iii人類學的gender-1-pica-pica性別與社會-19-bafybeif4ivk7zqspfduhpfyty2ye65oewkhk7rxqyml62fv6mlbwmh53g4 性別是来區分什麼的?(III人類學的Gender-1)PicaPica性別與社會(19) - PicaPica (@picapica2077)

Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @takebackourlife. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 730,168 of 1,183,361entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“0” (@takebackourlife), 5 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/takebackourlife.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.