🎥 کوه کلنگِ نطنز؛ آنچه میدانیم و نمیدانیم کانال فکت نامه

Channel
تحلیلک- اخبار
@tahlilakkk_khabar
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,278subscribers
-49 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002241048610 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tahlilakkk_khabar |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 27 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 15 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 27 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tahlilakkk_khabar |
Topic
International news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 27 Sept 2026, 06:36 | 1,278 | -9 |
| 17 Sept 2026, 13:55 | 1,287 | -6 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 08:59 | 1,293 | -1 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 01:58 | 1,294 | -4 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 10:08 | 1,298 | -6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 08:35 | 1,304 | -2 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 01:36 | 1,306 | -5 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:39 | 1,311 | +2 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 1,309 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 11:18 | 1,311 | -6 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 19:27 | 1,317 | -3 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:28 | 1,320 | +2 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:42 | 1,318 | -8 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:58 | 1,326 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:16 | 1,327 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
32 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 18 | 56.3% | |
| 👌 | 9 | 28.1% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 15.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 32 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
ترامپ : هیچکس نمیخواهد کشتیهایی به ارزش میلیاردها دلار را به خطر بیندازد و در معرض برخورد تصادفی با یک مین در تنگه هرمز قرار بگیرد.
ترامپ: ایرانیها علیرغم محاصرۀ دریایی آمریکا، قادر به کاشت مین در تنگۀ هرمز هستند
خبرنگار : زلنسکی موشک های پاتریوت میخواهد ترامپ : ما خودمان به پاتریوت بیشتر نیاز داریم
ترامپ : ما باید مهمات بیشتری داشته باشیم، ممکن است موارد دیگری هم پیش بیاید.
🔴 ترامپ درباره ایران: به نظر من، جنگ به زودی به پایان خواهد رسید. فکر نمیکنم آنها بتوانند این وضعیت را برای مدت طولانیتری ادامه دهند.
قالیباف: 🔹«حمله بزرگی در راه است... صبر کنید، نه، آنها میخواهند مذاکره کنند.» این یک نمایش دیپلماتیک تکراری است. 🔹استفاده از زور و تهدید، همراه با وعدههای شکسته و اخبار دروغین، یک استراتژی شکستخورده است. 🔹حقایق را بپذیرید و به تعهدات خود عمل کنید. ما به نمایشهای بیشتری نیاز نداریم.
👌3❤2
📌غیر رسمی📌 پس از استعفای محمد باقر ذو القدر، محسن رضایی به عنوان دبیر شورای عالی امنیت ملی منصوب شد.
❤4
فارس: عبور شناورهای متعلق به آمریکا، رژیم صهیونیستی و سایر کشورهای متخاصم از تنگه هرمز ممنوع میشود. محمولههای مرتبط با رژیم صهیونیستی، اعم از نظامی و غیرنظامی، حق تردد از این منطقه را نخواهند داشت. شناورها یا محمولههایی که در اقدامات علیه جبهه مقاومت نقش داشته باشند نیز مشمول ممنوعیت خواهند بود. کشورها و اشخاصی که به ایران خسارت وارد کردهاند، تا زمان جبران خسارت، مجوز عبور از تنگه هرمز و خلیج فارس را دریافت ن…
👌5
الحدث: توافقنامه مربوط به هرمز هنوز نیازمند تایید شورای عالی امنیت ملی ایران است. این نهاد هنوز توافقنامه را تایید نکرده است
❤1
ترامپ: داریم حجم زیادی از نفت ونزوئلا یعنی میلیاردهای بشکه نفت را تصاحب میکنیم؛ غنیمت برای برنده است
🔹ایران عوارض ۷٪ را بر تمام کشتیهای تجاری عبوری از تنگه هرمز اعلام کرده است 🔴این امر برای ایران ۳۸۵ میلیون دلار خالص روزانه یا بیش از ۱۰۰ میلیارد دلار خالص سالانه با حجم ترافیک پیش از جنگ ایجاد میکند
❤2❤🔥2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tahlilakkk_khabar. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
@amirbyte · 40,429
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 25 August 2026
@ganunejazb · 20,417
Telegram ranks this channel #64 of 69 here — alongside 68 others — read 27 September 2026
This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 27 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تحلیلک- اخبار” (@tahlilakkk_khabar), 1,278 subscribers as measured 27 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tahlilakkk_khabar.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.