Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for أسئلة تجويدية لحفص

Channel

أسئلة تجويدية لحفص

@tagoudhaf

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

3,731subscribers

+112 since we began measuring on 22 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001867539907
TypeChannel
Username@tagoudhaf
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded22 August 2026
Last confirmed live21 October 2026
Measurements held15
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 21 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/tagoudhaf

Topic

Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 14 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

3,6153,7323,673.522 August 2026 — 3,619 subscribers22 August 2026 — 3,619 subscribers23 August 2026 — 3,615 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,629 subscribers30 August 2026 — 3,636 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,637 subscribers6 September 2026 — 3,643 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,640 subscribers18 September 2026 — 3,682 subscribers28 September 2026 — 3,702 subscribers5 October 2026 — 3,717 subscribers12 October 2026 — 3,721 subscribers16 October 2026 — 3,728 subscribers18 October 2026 — 3,732 subscribers21 October 2026 — 3,731 subscribers3,73122 August 202621 October 2026
15 measurements spanning 60 days, net +112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,597–3,750 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
21 Oct 2026, 21:363,731-1
18 Oct 2026, 19:463,732+4
16 Oct 2026, 02:183,728+7
12 Oct 2026, 16:403,721+4
5 Oct 2026, 22:563,717+15
28 Sept 2026, 22:203,702+20
18 Sept 2026, 17:593,682+42
10 Sept 2026, 21:213,640-3
6 Sept 2026, 04:383,643+6
1 Sept 2026, 22:043,637+1
30 Aug 2026, 05:083,636+7
26 Aug 2026, 23:543,629+14
23 Aug 2026, 15:143,615-4
22 Aug 2026, 13:303,619no change
22 Aug 2026, 13:153,619first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 11 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 17 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

111 reactions across 18 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 64.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7164.0%
👍2623.4%
🥱98.11%
👏54.50%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 111 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 17 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

17 Aug 2026, 14:44 UTC488 views2 reactionsread 22 August 2026

https://t.me/sohalqra

❤2

Signed إيناس حسن

25 Jun 2026, 12:27 UTC≈1,760 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
File

تسهيل الجزرية بالأسئلة والأجوبة الجلية

❤5

Signed إيناس حسن

23 Jun 2026, 17:21 UTC≈1,900 views4 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤4

Signed إيناس حسن

1 Jun 2026, 08:55 UTC≈2,690 viewsread 22 August 2026
File

File, posted without a caption

Signed إيناس حسن

17 Feb 2026, 19:45 UTC≈4,000 views17 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤17

Signed إيناس حسن

17 Feb 2026, 18:16 UTC≈3,300 views15 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤15

Signed إيناس حسن

17 Feb 2026, 18:15 UTC≈2,750 views6 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤6

Signed إيناس حسن

17 Feb 2026, 15:40 UTC≈2,680 views1 reactionsread 22 August 2026

https://t.me/aselashat

❤1

Signed إيناس حسن

16 Feb 2026, 13:16 UTC≈3,120 views9 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Poll

يشترط للمد الطبيعي الا يقع

  1. سكون بعده4%
  2. همز بعده4%
  3. همز قبله2%
  4. كل ما سبق89%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍9

Signed إيناس حسن

16 Feb 2026, 13:00 UTC≈2,440 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

❤5

Signed إيناس حسن

16 Feb 2026, 12:59 UTC≈2,610 views5 reactionsread 22 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

👏5

Signed إيناس حسن

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @tagoudhaf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

16 Feb 2026, 13:16 UTCAnonymous Quiz848 voters

يشترط للمد الطبيعي الا يقع

  1. سكون بعده4%
  2. همز بعده4%
  3. همز قبله2%
  4. كل ما سبق89%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

15 Feb 2026, 14:20 UTCAnonymous Quiz822 voters

المد في الاسماء المقصورة المنونة بالفتح نحو هدىً هو مد

  1. عوض60%
  2. طبيعى35%
  3. بدل3%
  4. عارض2%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

12 Feb 2026, 08:51 UTCAnonymous Quiz642 voters

اذا اختل ركن من أركان القراءة فإنها ...

  1. لا تتأثر الا في حال. ان يختل ركنين على الأقل7%
  2. لا تعتبر قرءانا6%
  3. تصير قرءاة شاذه24%
  4. ٢. ٣46%
  5. لا شئ مما سبق17%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 11 February 2026 to 17 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“أسئلة تجويدية لحفص” (@tagoudhaf), 3,731 subscribers as measured 21 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tagoudhaf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.