Channel
@tafsirekiri
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
10,147subscribers
+11 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1001616581428 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tafsirekiri |
| Created | 27 June 2022 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 28 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tafsirekiri |
Religion — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 43% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Sept 2026, 19:17 | 10,147 | +2 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 18:17 | 10,145 | +1 |
| 13 Sept 2026, 23:41 | 10,144 | -2 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 05:18 | 10,146 | -5 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 20:59 | 10,151 | -2 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 13:40 | 10,153 | +18 |
| 4 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 10,135 | -1 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 13:48 | 10,136 | +3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 13:43 | 10,133 | -3 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 14:54 | 10,136 | +1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:37 | 10,135 | -5 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 12:06 | 10,140 | -2 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 10,142 | -1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 10,143 | -2 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 12:33 | 10,145 | -5 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:35 | 10,150 | +3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 10,147 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 09:17 | 10,146 | +1 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 12:17 | 10,145 | +5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 13:35 | 10,140 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 19 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 35 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 23 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 21 (19 November 2025 – 23 August 2026) |
| Views total | 4,670 |
| Reactions total | 184 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 29 Aug 2026, 03:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
4,383 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 61.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2,707 | 61.8% | |
| 🤣 | 1,288 | 29.4% | |
| 😢 | 192 | 4.38% | |
| 👎 | 157 | 3.58% | |
| 🤔 | 34 | 0.776% | |
| 🤯 | 5 | 0.114% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 21 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,383 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 21 most recent posts we hold, published 19 November 2025 to 23 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @tafsirekiri. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 21 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 19 November 2025 to 23 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
دو از دو ولی زمانی که تئوری داروین چند دهه بعد از خودش توی نظام آموزشی غرب جای ثابت پیدا کرد و نسلهای بعدی اصلا با پیشفرض داروینی دنیا رو درک کردن و تئوری فرگشت شد جزیی از Social Imaginaryشون، همه چیز عوض شد؛ تئوریای که نشون میده تمام فرمهای حیات در نهایت محصولی از تصادفهایی هستن که صرفا مسیرهای متفاوتی رو طی کردن. مرد، زن، زرافه، کرم کون و شنبلهلیله همه صرفا محصول randomnessهای بی هدف و بیغایتن، و هیچ کدومش…
❤94😢19👎5🤯1
یک از دو پیرو پست قبلی، یه سری پیام داشتم که داداچ بیا تاثیر سیل روی خودتم بگو دیگه. از آخرین پیام البته مدتها گذشته، ولی چون شما گفتین منم بگم. توضیح اثر این سیل روی خودم خیلی آسون نیست متاسفانه، اما بذارین با یه بحثی از یه فیلسوف همولایتی کانادایی شروع کنم به نام چارلز تیلور که در سن ۹۴ سالگی همچنان داره با قدرت توی دانشگاه مکگیل درس فلسفه میده. این بابا یه بحثی داره به نام social-imaginary که معنیش میشه یه چی…
❤63😢2
یه داستانی توی مثنوی هست که اساسا ترازوی اصلی من برای قضاوت کردن آدماست، از جمله قضاوت کردن خودم. داستان مردی که از بغداد (نیویورک اون زمان) برمیگشته و توی راه به دو سه تا از رفیقاش برمیخوره و اونا هم از سفر و گشت و گذارش پرس و جو میکنن. یارو هم که فرصتی برای عرض اندام پیدا کرده بوده، شروع میکنه به خالی بستن که آره شخص خلیفه یه شب شام دعوتم کرد و کلی تحویلم گرفت و چقدر بهم غذا و پول و لباسهای گرون قیمت هدیه داد …
❤237🤔4🤣4🤯1
درود رفقا. نمیدونم این روزا اوضاع قطع و وصلی اینترنت اون طرف چطوره، ولی وظیفهم بود تک و توک پیام و کامنتهایی که این یکی دو هفته برام اومده رو بیجواب نذارم و عرض ارادتی بکنم. قبلا گفتم بچه که بودم ما گرگان زندگی میکردیم. توی خونهای که من بچهی آخرش بودم و به جز من همهی خانواده نه تنها از فوتبال، بلکه کلا از مفهوم ورزش متنفر بودن، فوتبال دیدن کار آسونی نبود. ذوق فوتبال دیدن من معمولا با شروع فیلم و سریال از اون ی…
❤276😢59👎5🤣2
باز گردد عاقبت این در؟ بلی رو نماید یارِ سیمینبر؟ بلی ساقی ما یاد این مستان کند بار دیگر با می و ساغر؟ بلی نوبهار حُسن آید سوی باغ؟ بشکفد آن شاخههای تر؟ بلی دامن پُر خاک و خاشاکِ زمین پُر شود از مشک و از عنبر؟ بلی آن برِ سیمین و این روی چو زر اندرآمیزند سیم و زر؟ بلی این سرِ مخمورِ اندیشهپرست مست گردد زان میِ احمر؟ بلی این دو چشمِ اشکبارِ نوحهگر روشنی یابد از آن منظر؟ بلی من خمش کردم و لیکن در دلم تا ابد ر…
❤191😢20👎2
به عنوان یه دههشصتی بزرگ شده توی یه شهر کوچیک (گرگان)، بچه که بودیم نه تنها اینترنت هنوز اختراع نشده بود، بلکه خیلی از ماها تلفن هم نداشتیم. یه تماس کوچیک با فلان فامیل ساکن مثلا مشهد (که اونا هم تلفن نداشتن) نیازمند این بود که یه سر بریم اون طرف شهر خونهی فلان دوستی که تلفن داره، زنگ بزنیم به دوست اون فامیل توی مشهد، ازشون بخوایم که یه سر برن خونهی فلانی، بهش بگن که فلان روز فلان ساعت بیان خونهی این دوستشون و دو…
❤207😢29
خورشید درخشان شد، تا باد چنین بادا 😌 @TafsireKiri ▫️
❤181👎11🤣4
Video, posted without a caption
❤52🤔2🤯1
حیف که هم حال و روز و اعصابمون خرابه، هم یه سریاتون دوسش دارید و بعضیاتونم عزیزای منید و دلم نمیاد تو این وضعیت بیشتر برم رو اعصابتون. فقط باید بگم کلی سوژه داره میسوزه این روزا، و کتاب کتاب حرفای طنز و حرفای جدی و بیضویه که داره در نطفه خفه میشه. @TafsireKiri ▫️
🤣194👎67❤39🤯2
«من اومدم تا اونهایی که کور بودن ببینن و اونایی که فکر میکردن میبینن کور بشن». یه مفهومی توی فرهنگ غرب هست که ریشههای کهنش به انجیل و چند جملهی کم و بیش گنگِ منسوب به مسیح برمیگرده (مثل جملهی بالا)، اما این مفهوم اونقدر طی قرنها توی فرهنگ مذهبی مسیحی اروپا جویده و فلسفیده شده که میوههاش از همه جا سر درآورده، از قانون اساسی همین کشورها گرفته تا خیلی از فیلم و سریالهایی که ازشون دیدید. مفهومی تحت عنوان «کوری …
❤282👎31🤔8🤣5
حالا اینکه رکورد تعداد کامنتو زیر کوتاهترین پست کانال شکستین خودش نکتهایه. ولی اون دوازده نفری که share کردن و برای «رسمن گاییدین» به رفرنس نیاز داشتنو دیگه نمیتونم واقعا. @TafsireKiri ▫️
🤣166❤12🤔4👎2
گاییدین. رسمن گاییدین. @TafsireKiri ▫️
🤣110❤13😢13👎6🤔4
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @tafsirekiri. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
@tafsirekiri edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“تفسیر بیضوی مثنوی معنوی” (@tafsirekiri), 10,147 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tafsirekiri.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.