Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Алексей Божий Человек

@tafferttt

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,421subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001929706213
TypeChannel
Username@tafferttt
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held5
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/tafferttt

Growth

1,4141,4211,417.57 August 2026 — 1,414 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,416 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,416 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,417 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,421 subscribers7 August 202613 August 2026
5 measurements spanning 6 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,413–1,422 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 05:181,421+4
10 Aug 2026, 14:421,417+1
7 Aug 2026, 22:161,416no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:221,416+2
7 Aug 2026, 13:591,414first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 11 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
64.1%
avg views ÷ 1,421 subscribers
Avg views / post
911
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
5.71%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held8 (11 June 20267 August 2026)
Views total1,822
Reactions total104
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 22:16 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

635 reactions across 8 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 24.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 544968731816206256815824.9%
custom 51931608615810713169915.6%
custom 53214782322293019437111.2%
custom 52763581748556676476710.6%
custom 53122025159141793866410.1%
custom 5278373321971344663406.30%
custom 5235564897600807979355.51%
custom 5206477218703753213233.62%
custom 5213137433079610149223.46%
custom 5332526915339173439223.46%
custom 5242635148209440185111.73%
custom 5427105539760865066111.73%
custom 532586838888548454250.787%
custom 525347751827028883730.472%
custom 541816483948476779820.315%
custom 546105392334111576120.315%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 635reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 11 June 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 11:05 UTC262 views47 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Каюсь, ребят, бессовестно пропал с радаров, уехав в Карелию на неделю с лишним. Уже вернулся отдохнувший и понемногу возвращаюсь в рабочий ритм, по проектам со всеми свяжусь в ближайшее время🌚

custom 519316086158107131622custom 524263514820944018511custom 54496873181620625689custom 53214782322293019435

21 Jul 2026, 16:41 UTC≈1,560 views57 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По свободному эскизу 🤡

custom 527837332197134466340custom 54496873181620625688custom 52763581748556676475custom 51931608615810713162custom 52131374330796101492

13 Jul 2026, 16:20 UTC≈1,440 views105 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

👤Что вершит судьбу человечества в этом мире? Некое незримое существо или закон, подобно Длани Господней, парящей над миром? По крайней мере, истинно то, что человек не властен даже над своей волей👤

custom 531220251591417938664custom 520647721870375321323custom 544968731816206256813custom 53258683888854845425

9 Jul 2026, 07:15 UTC≈2,620 views138 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Всем привет, я - Алексей Божий Человек, и так сложилось, что сегодня у меня день рождения. Я посвятил много лет гравюрным татуировкам, нанес уже наверное десятки километров линий людям под кожу, но никогда еще не делал подобные «днерожденные» посты. Сегодня, пожалуй, выкачу такой, с некоторыми своими работами. Буду безумно благодарен и рад репостам. И тут как нигде лучше подойдёт цитата: "Художнику нужен зритель" (к

custom 544968731816206256867custom 532147823222930194334custom 519316086158107131622custom 542710553976086506611custom 52131374330796101494

7 Jul 2026, 15:19 UTC983 views73 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Экстренная крупноформатная резка женских пяток и ягодиц в терапевтических целях, во избежание перегруза центральной нервной системы по причине постоянного нанесения мрачных татуировок😦

custom 519316086158107131641custom 521313743307961014915custom 527635817485566764710custom 54496873181620625687

2 Jul 2026, 15:22 UTC≈1,090 views58 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Кто проживает на дне океана?

custom 523556489760080797935custom 544968731816206256813custom 533252691533917343910

22 Jun 2026, 16:12 UTC≈1,390 views67 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

У каждого свой замок, у каждого свой дракон. Только защищают они совершенно разные вещи🚬

custom 544968731816206256836custom 532147823222930194316custom 533252691533917343910custom 52534775182702888373custom 54181648394847677982

11 Jun 2026, 15:07 UTC≈2,570 views90 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Пожалуй, один из моих любимых сюжетов в татуировке 💀 И конечно же куда без похотливого деда 🚬

custom 527635817485566764752custom 532147823222930194316custom 519316086158107131612custom 54496873181620625685custom 53325269153391734392custom 54610539233411157612custom 52131374330796101491

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @tafferttt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,119,841 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Алексей Божий Человек” (@tafferttt), 1,421 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tafferttt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.