Вопрос к вам! Что делать сейчас?
- Фиксировать прибыль и закрывать сделки 💰0%
- Ждать туземун до 3000$🚀50%
- Часть зафиксировать, часть оставить😎50%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@tachka_na_kripte
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,055subscribers
-15 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001202447346 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @tachka_na_kripte |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 August 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/tachka_na_kripte |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 08:20 | 1,055 | -1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 04:04 | 1,056 | -3 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 04:25 | 1,059 | -4 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 08:25 | 1,063 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 1,064 | -2 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:35 | 1,066 | -3 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 01:56 | 1,069 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:17 | 1,070 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 12:54 | 1,070 | first reading |
14 posts held, back to 30 May 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
10 reactions across 9 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.0% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 6 | 60.0% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 30.0% | |
| 😱 | 1 | 10.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2025 to 15 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Вопрос к вам! Что делать сейчас?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
С 30$ до 300$ за 1 день💪 10х😱😱😱 День для многих был неприятный, но я успел залететь по фану по вкусным ценам! Был готов потерять деньги, поэтому сумму взял небольшую! Кратко расскажу как. Я зашел в 5 сделок, скрины по ним прислал выше. С профита по ним, зашел еще в 13 сделок😎 Т.к прибыль быстро прибавляла, я на нее открывал новые сделки, в сумме их стало 13😎
🔥1
Хочется конечно 3000$😎 Но и терять 300$ не хочется…
Больно смотреть🙈 На актив, который вырос в 2 раза за 10 дней, но у тебя нет его в портфеле😅
😱1
Приятно смотреть🤩
👍1
Долго продлится веселье? Ваши ставки
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
👍1
Тапалки живы💰 Речь конечно не про всех, а пока про одну. Заработал 8$=200PIXEL Просто тупо участвуя в конкурсе, играл в обычном режиме) и из-за того что игра не так раскачана(меньше конкуренции) Немного-да, но в пике курс доходил до 1$ за PIXEL, поэтому есть вероятность иксануться😎 Делаем действия, чтобы потом не жалеть об упущенной возможности, а там уже пусть будет как будет! Обычно успеха достигает кто идет …
Где продать звезды TG? ▪️Спрашивали в чате можно ли продать звезды? 🔤Я думал что нельзя, но поделились со мной ботом которому кидаешь звезды и через 21 день они тебе отдают кеш Прайс дешевле чем покупка, но вроде как это норм Кому нужно, пользуйтесь 👍
Нотпиксель сделали вееещь💪 Несмотря на их высер с прошлой раздачей, сейчас они прям делают пирамиду, решил не упускать возможность, самому поучаствовать и с вами опытом поделиться. В общем смысл такой, что нужно покупать точки на холсте за пиксели, потом их у вас выкупают в 2 раза дороже и т.д Задумка интересная, можно и подзаработать и полудить😎 А также это разгоняет количество транзакций в сети тон и объем торг…
TG стикеры превысили обьем в $550k Это пздц конечно) бычка в ТГ.. Хайп после подарков Для понимания, колекция с акулами которая вышла на днях, выходила и до этого. Стоила 8888 звезд, это примеро 40 TON. Сейчас стоит 420 TON, 10 иксов, сюдаа 🥵 Затарюсь чуть звездами, тут удобно брать и походу нужно осваивать ботов для выкупа, т.к. руками не успеть 🏁🏃 Эксклюзивные стикеры NASCAR x Pudgy появятся в 17:00 по МСК. Ог…
🔥1
Пока ждем выход коллекции, можно сюда зайти https://t.me/palacenftbot/app?startapp=bqJ6AwvVVl, выполнить задания, обещают раздать бесплатно стикеры, места еще есть. Делаем💪
👍1
Держусь в топе по сражениям в CAPYBOMB😎 Нашел лайфхак, если видите что проигрываете сражение, просто закрывайте игру и снова начинайте. Билеты сохраняются😉 Проверить: https://t.me/capybombbot/capybomb?startapp=g_1041_18057092_1043 Насыпьте 🔥 за наводку
🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @tachka_na_kripte. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Вопрос к вам! Что делать сейчас?
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Долго продлится веселье? Ваши ставки
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 30 May 2025 to 15 October 2025. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тачка на КРИПТЕ | Car on the CRYPTO🚀” (@tachka_na_kripte), 1,055 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/tachka_na_kripte.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.