Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 庄庄的朋友圈

Channel

庄庄的朋友圈

@szxzz222

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

507subscribers

+439 since we began measuring on 27 October 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004311837227
TypeChannel
Username@szxzz222
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 30 September 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded27 October 2026
Last confirmed live4 November 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 4 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/szxzz222

Growth

68507287.527 October 2026 — 68 subscribers28 October 2026 — 171 subscribers4 November 2026 — 507 subscribers27 October 20264 November 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net +439. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2–573 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
4 Nov 2026, 08:15507+336
28 Oct 2026, 04:48171+103
27 Oct 2026, 16:2268first reading

Engagement

6 posts held, back to 27 October 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.2%
avg views ÷ 507 subscribers
Avg views / post
51.5
6 posts measured
Reaction rate
—
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
6
of 6 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 October 2026
Posts held6 (27 October 2026 – 27 October 2026)
Views total309
Reactions total—
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken27 Oct 2026, 16:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 6 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

27 Oct 2026, 15:36 UTC51 viewsread 27 October 2026

#龙华小庄庄 核验ID @szxzz123 在深圳协会亲测榜视频验证收录✅ ━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━ 🏆主群 @xzxhxzxh 🏆亲测榜 @owuambn 协会秉承着每一个资源都经过人像亲测审核后去收录,努力打造一个纯净的cj环境,真资源,真狼友,欢迎优质师生加入,白嫖,工兵,现金出击补贴等你拿✅

27 Oct 2026, 15:29 UTC56 viewsread 27 October 2026
Photo

🤫【地区】:#深圳北 😓【昵称】:#庄庄 🛫【私信】:@szxzz123 😥【频道】:@szxzz222 🫤【课费】:800P/1500PP 🤥👉点此提交报告助力🖥 🥵🤫🤫😳🤫🤫😑 出击请认准上榜推广老师🤫 交流群: @hz1916

27 Oct 2026, 15:20 UTC63 viewsread 27 October 2026
Photo

🎰 龙华庄庄P半价工兵卷 📮 参与条件: 🌏️ 归属地 广东 🪪 必须设置用户名 🎫 加入-庄庄的朋友圈 🎫 加入-野寻 · 深圳学生交流群 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 15 条 🎫 加入-野寻 · 深圳修车档案 🎫 加入-野寻 · 深圳活动公告 🎫 加入-野寻 · 深圳打卡通告群 🎁 奖品内容: 💰️ 龙华庄庄P半价工兵卷 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 1.中奖24小时之内联系南汐发放工兵凭证 @chase_nx 2.3天内完成报告向 @chaseszxc_bot 提交 3.半价,白嫖卷出击必须提交报告!否则拉黑 🔋 人品加成:⚡️× 9 规则 📅 开奖日期:(北京时间) 2026年10月29日 20时00分00秒

27 Oct 2026, 15:07 UTC52 viewsread 27 October 2026
Forwarded from @chasesz_lsdaPhoto

♥️CHASE | ♡ SHENZHEN 💌 0条车评,综合评分 好评 0% |人照 |服务 中评 0% |颜值 |态度 差评 0% |身材 |环境 艺名 : #小庄庄 地区 : #龙华新区 深圳北 数据 : 2007_162_50_C 价格 : #8P #15PP #38YE 服务 : #舌吻 #69 #角色扮演 #可外出 #可过夜 标签 : #嫩妹系 🌍 联系方式 : 点击获取小庄庄联系方式 约课备注"野寻推荐" ✉️ 评价老师 : 点击评价 B紧水多 叫声甜美 会吸会夹 💌 学生交流 💌 作业评价 💌 工兵活动 💌 会员制度

27 Oct 2026, 14:07 UTC80 viewsread 27 October 2026
Forwarded from @SZxiuche_ZYPhoto

【老师名字】:#小庄庄 【位置坐标】:#龙华 【老师电报】:@szxzz123 【老师频道】:https://t.me/szxzz222 【双向联系】:@szxz123_bot 【上课消费】:800p 1500pp

Showing the 6 most recent of 6 posts we hold for @szxzz222. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“庄庄的朋友圈” (@szxzz222), 507 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szxzz222.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.