Channel
@szsnzn
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
7,354subscribers
+178 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002556586594 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szsnzn |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szsnzn |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Aug 2026, 05:14 | 7,354 | +114 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 13:45 | 7,240 | +40 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 17:42 | 7,200 | +24 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:16 | 7,176 | first reading |
27 posts held, back to 1 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 27 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 27 (1 August 2026 – 11 August 2026) |
| Views total | 15,850 |
| Reactions total | 7 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 12 Aug 2026, 02:15 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
7 reactions across 6 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 71.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 5 | 71.4% | |
| 👍 | 2 | 28.6% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 27 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 27 most recent posts we hold, published 1 August 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
美少女投稿报告模版 留名：三三 老师艺名：小怡 位置坐标：#南山 颜值身材：9 服务内容：频道里写的 出击体验： 今天闲来无事，看中小怡老师许久，联系了老师有空，果断约课，期待值拉满，排课宽松，提前出发到达课室，遥控上楼，开门就看见甜美可爱的嫩妹，心里怦怦跳，初恋般的感觉，老师笑着跟我聊了一会，带着我一块洗了个鸳鸯浴，老师身上也是香香的，让我主动的想靠近她，洗涑完，擦干水，然后带着我进入了卧室，开始服务，嫩妹三件套直接开干，顶不住诱惑，先来了一次，中途休息主动聊天，然后聊了一会儿，突然又有兴趣了，老师懂我的心思，开始挑逗，经不住诱惑又来了一次，太诱惑了，直接顶不住，结束后又休息了会，然后一起洗澡，依依不舍地离开了，下次还会来的 联系方式：@yyy66116 ( 导航: @SZGYHQG ) 报告提交： @MSNBG_bot
Telegram必备的搜索引擎，极搜JISOU帮你精准找到，想要的群组、频道、视频、音乐 👉 t.me/jisou2?start=a_954209868
美少女投稿报告模版 留名：zzzl 老师艺名：温蒂妮 位置坐标：#南山 颜值身材：课表 服务内容：课表 出击体验： 进门老师穿着性感，人照一致，本人更有气质，身材不错，屁股圆圆，进门很热情，两个奶换来换去，看到我眼睛发光，洗澡的时候老师就开始服务，洗完老师贴心擦干，按摩，毒龙🐉，口交，各种服务一个接着一个，让我爽歪歪 ，最让我喜欢的冰火两重天，差一点没忍住缴枪，赶紧喊停，戴套上阵冲击，各种姿势全程配合，非常不错，个人感觉服务绝对OK，最后老师还帮我洗澡，穿衣服，这么细致的服务一定给写个好评 联系方式：@wdn2005 ( 导航: @SZGYHQG ) 报告提交： @MSNBG_bot
美少女投稿报告模版 留名：人间凑数 老师艺名：小怡 位置坐标：#南山 科技园北 颜值身材：一般，胸小，瘦底黄皮，本人没有照片好看 服务内容：98 出击体验： 平时也不咋出击，一出击就踩大雷，真服了我自己。楼下罚站10分钟就算了，上楼后她就躺床上也不迎接你，全程自助。还催你交费，也不陪洗，全程没有一点笑容，超级冷淡。洗完之后我问她，啥流程？要不先亲一会，她说她不亲的。她说不然她先口吧，口了不到1分钟，说戴套吧。行吧，我说你上来吧，她说她不会女上。接着就传教士，后入，传教士切换，最终出水，全程10来分钟吧。800的价格，你干一个死鱼你敢信。全程她捂着嘴，一声也不想叫。最后要走的时候，我说你频道的服务是一点没有，频道好评咋来的，她说是中介代聊的。没有服务态度建议不要下海。 联系方式： @yyy66116 ( 导航: @SZGYHQG ) 报告提交： @MSNBG_bot
👍2
美少女投稿报告模版 留名：B 老师艺名：小果子 位置坐标：#褔田 颜值身材：巨乳嫩妹 服务内容：全套 出击体验： 一进门就看到老师穿着睡衣小小一只好可爱，然后坐下来聊了会天老师就脱衣服了想不到老师居然有一对巨乳一只手几乎握不住，接着老师就叫我脱衣服一起去洗澡，洗完之后老师就叫我睡床上帮我口，想不到老师口技一流差点就被口射了还好我意志坚定忍了下来，然后就带套做老师态度很即使换了几个姿势也没黑面而且还主动蛇，看着老师的巨乳一直摇做了十分钟就射了，然后洗澡聊了会天就走了 虽然老师课室里有点烟味但口里一点没有 联系方式： @gz16788 ( 导航: @SZGYHQG ) 报告提交： @MSNBG_bot
美少女投稿报告模版 留名：小不点呀 老师艺名：恬恬 位置坐标：#南山 颜值身材：漂亮温柔，胸很大 服务内容：课表都有 出击体验：摸起来软软的，胸控十分满足；菜单上的服务都有，还应我要求穿了学生制服，反差感强；服务很到位，配合度高，床上反馈很好，非常风骚。下次有机会一定再刷！ 联系方式：@zhang10141 ( 导航: @SZGYHQG ) 报告提交： @MSNBG_bot
南山19妹妹 @beibei534 三张 -100优惠卷 联系老师自行领取，需写报告
❤1
开课咯宝宝们
留名： 早睡第一天 老师艺名： 雨珂 位置坐标：#南山 颜值身材： 嫩妹 服务内容： xcz 出击体验： 人没出发先被鸽了半个小时，本来约好的一点钟，中午又说一点半，ok问题不大。等驱车到达给的地址时，问几楼迟迟不回复，这时候我就知道账号不是本人了🐶。罚站了近二十分钟才跟我说30几楼，密码的这栋楼最高才28楼，我反复确认才说是另一栋。布什戈门，看起来没脑子啊。好不容易找到等电梯，在那催我快点，wtm？？我还阴阳他谢谢你指的好路，耽误大家时间，他还回我“服务好，给个好评就行了，不用客气”。原话，真被气笑了🙃 进房后见到妹妹，不能说跟频道照片不符合，只能说是完全不一致，左臂和右腿都有符文，妆容略重，奈何妹妹态度还算可以，黄皮嫩弹，于是交水费洗洗。有陪洗，我没要求🐍但听妹妹说是有漱过口，真🐻不大，一手掌握，胜在嫩弹。妹妹从上到下舔了一遍，口的还行没有齿感，也是不喊停不会停的，很听话，然后带上雨伞开工，她跟我…
Video, posted without a caption
21：30 南山雨柯 @Yuke64 工兵券积分兑换 南山千千 @xiuxiu12580 工兵券积分兑换
投稿报告模版 留名：夜影留云梦 老师艺名：恬恬 位置坐标：#南山 颜值身材：8 服务内容：口，做，别的没了 出击体验： 恬恬，原价1300p，中了半价出击，在南山东方山水公寓，踩雷了，中介来着，人照不合一。虽然是嫩妹，紧致有水，但如果是原价1300 1400是一点都不值，口了一会，女上就搞了两下，没啥服务，感觉像吃了快餐一样，大概半小时就结束了，妥妥踩坑，不推荐。 联系方式：@zhang10141 ( 导航: @SZGYHQG ) 报告提交： @MSNBG_bot
Showing the 12 most recent of 27 posts we hold for @szsnzn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 35,245 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳—少女鉴赏指南” (@szsnzn), 7,354 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szsnzn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.