深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message

Channel
深圳修车司机协会报告榜
@szsjxh3
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,336subscribers
-42 since we began measuring on 23 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001599104924 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szsjxh3 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 23 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szsjxh3 |
Topic
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 82% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 14:39 | 1,336 | -8 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 04:38 | 1,344 | -11 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 16:36 | 1,355 | -4 |
| 7 Sept 2026, 07:02 | 1,359 | -10 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 12:43 | 1,369 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 10:06 | 1,370 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 18:57 | 1,374 | -2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 08:06 | 1,376 | -2 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 14:45 | 1,378 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 17 February 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- —
- no view readings in window
- Avg views / post
- —
- no view readings
- Reaction rate
- —
- this channel exposes no reaction counts
- Posts in window
- 1
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (17 February 2026 – 22 August 2026) |
| Views total | — |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 23 Aug 2026, 14:45 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Recent posts
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
【出车报告】:https://t.me/szsjxh1 【所在位置】龙华 【老师艺名】雨嘉 【联系方式】@Yujia1668 【验证留名】青春蓝袋 【验证时间】4.8 【出车价位】900p 【颜值身材】萝莉 人照9 可爱 娇小 【服务内容】 课表都有 【服务态度】话唠 小可爱 听话懂事 【优点缺点】萝莉控福音 🐻略小 【推荐程度】🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 【体验细节】感谢修车协会 好运抽中雨嘉 ! 前几天妹妹休息了,假期回来马上就约了~ 老规矩遥控上楼~ 嘿嘿 推开门,看到熟悉的小可爱,又好看了呢~ 妹妹 今天妆容很精致~ 状态也不错,看来假期是休息好了~ 坐过去,就上手摸摸~不能浪费时间,春宵一刻值千金~ 抱着就🐍起来~ 褪去外衣,🐻虽然小点,她穿的那个内衣有点神奇,挤挤也是有的!哈哈😂 手拉手去洗香香,浴室依然抱着亲~ 话唠 一点都不冷场,可调皮了~ 躺在床上,主动就开始口上来了~ 技术有进步喔~感觉上来了~差点被口出来~推到 按在身下 …
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
【出车报告】:https://t.me/szsjxh1 【所在位置】:南山 【老师艺名】:蓝汐 【联系方式】:@lanxisz 【验证留名】: 青春B袋 【验证时间】:20260401 【出车价位】:900 【颜值身材】:大E奶无科技,好rua,黄皮光滑无赘肉,舌吻无异味,69好配合,两个小白兔呼之欲出 【服务内容】:水中萧 69 AB 爱爱 【服务态度】:10分 【优点缺点】:情绪价值拉满,熊推指滑,大奶子爱不释手 【推荐程度】:9分 【体验细节】:进门穿着低胸,大奶子御姐,颜值耐看不愧是澳门选手,就知道来对地方了,科室很有氛围,热情迎接脱衣服,一边摸奈子一边洗澡,突然蹲下来了一回水中萧,差点没忍住,立马让老师回床上穿好情趣内衣,再来服务放松一下,口到舒服才停,直接提枪上阵,女上大奶子若隐若现,扒开直接舔,厚乳反馈声音好听,换到正面边抓边玩,直接没忍住发射了,还没有尽兴,老师帮洗再调戏一下,只能下次再来,喜欢大奈子的直接冲 …
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
深圳修车司机协会报告榜 pinned Deleted message
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @szsjxh3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳修车司机协会报告榜” (@szsjxh3), 1,336 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szsjxh3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.