学生留名:6188 时间日期:7.20 被骗金额:600 被骗过程:也不是被骗了吧,看到照片以为是本人,结果来了个老几岁的 骗我说是美过颜的 但是你这美颜的也太离谱了吧 完完全全百分百不是本人 胸也是掉下来的 跟频道上百分百不是本人 服务流程:难评 老师电报:@lili5359
❤1

Channel
@szleibaopaizi
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
3,018subscribers
+175 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1002528573739 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szleibaopaizi |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 14 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 11 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szleibaopaizi |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 01:40 | 3,018 | +9 |
| 12 Sept 2026, 10:40 | 3,009 | -11 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 18:39 | 3,020 | -28 |
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:22 | 3,048 | -23 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 03:26 | 3,071 | +9 |
| 28 Aug 2026, 06:04 | 3,062 | +45 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 19:38 | 3,017 | +87 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:42 | 2,930 | +36 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 2,894 | +45 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 14:57 | 2,849 | +6 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:15 | 2,843 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 16 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 24 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
2 reactions across 2 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 2 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 16 June 2026 to 24 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
学生留名:6188 时间日期:7.20 被骗金额:600 被骗过程:也不是被骗了吧,看到照片以为是本人,结果来了个老几岁的 骗我说是美过颜的 但是你这美颜的也太离谱了吧 完完全全百分百不是本人 胸也是掉下来的 跟频道上百分百不是本人 服务流程:难评 老师电报:@lili5359
❤1
留名:Scott 时间:0706 花名:龙岗竹竹 坐标:坂田天安云谷 花费:7p 容貌:丑,人照2分 经历:大雷,人照不一致就算了,态度极差,没有任何服务,课表里的服务一样没有。一进门一脸死人样,坐那里就玩手机,一动不动,我说去洗才洗,就是要钱特别积极,然后洗完我躺那里了,结果她在旁边躺的比我还扎实,啥服务都不做。我主动吧,她又这里不让动,那里不让碰的,超级大雷。 频道:https://t.me/jdjhdh666 电报:@xxjj88990
留名:匿名 时间:7.22晚上 花名:甜甜圈 坐标:宝安山水公寓 花费:无 容貌:炸裂 经历:假人假照,本来妹子在罗湖,然后说晚上到南山,后面约到了地方楼下,说她正在赶回来,几分钟,后面一上楼,打开就是假照假人 频道:https://t.me/tiantianquano 电报:@bb52593
留名:苏克 时间:26.7.12 花名:南山锦汐 坐标:南山区国际市长交流中心 花费:0 容貌:一眼假 经历:见到真人后一眼假 频道:@wanting501688 电报:@wanting112
❤1
伤兵留名:小伟 雷师花名:福田芊芊07(开课中) 踩雷详情:中了半价去工兵,中介表示要定金留位才能约课,因为这个是新老师,就联系了群主,群主说半价工兵是不需要定金的,但是老师要求要约时间必须给定,只有临时约才不用定金,也是问了下老师什么叫临时约,大概就是被鸽子了,临时有位置,提前半个小时问他,我就说那路途超过半小时的,岂不是约不上你,提前半小时约,你又约不上怎么办。果然提前3次半小时问,果然约不上,换小号又直接约上了,问中介,中介直接给我拉黑了,哈哈🤣。 雷师TG @qian4484
伤兵留名:寺北 雷师花名:甜甜 踩雷时间:7.18 所在城市:深圳宝安 踩雷支出:6p 踩雷经历:起因也是贪便宜了,中了个优惠券就出击了,频道全部的图片视频根本不是本人!进屋是个熟妇,全妆还说得过去吧,我本身要求没那么高,问了有没有丝袜,老师说有,就给了水费,后面洗完上床说得加100能穿丝袜,加300上全套,无语了,自然是没加。。流程基本就是洗吹做,半个小时走完流程,看了下聊天记录还把消息全部清空了。现在也明白了一件事,以后人照不符我直接走人了。 雷师TG @tipp188
伤兵留名:mo 雷师花名:新安泉小丸子 踩雷时间:2026-06-12 踩雷详情:早早就加了微信约了礼拜五头班,礼拜五下午5点多一点就已经到房间了,房间隔音有点差,等到6点20几分看还没来以为在吃饭,实在等不及了微信问结果她说她忘了,然后还了定金还发多发了50,出来玩这么久第一次碰到这种情况,很烂 雷师微信:删了没留
伤兵留名:XX 骗子花名:柳如烟 城市坐标:福田 湾尚骏玺A坐 14楼 被骗金额:5k 颜值身材:颜值 严重不符 被骗详情:5k双飞 给了定金 500想着这么大的深圳个人频道 应该很好 就去了,去了以后 发现不是本人 差别很大,想着定金交了 这么大频道可能是服务超级好,来都来了别让老师觉得是口嗨的,交完剩余水费之后 服务可以说就两个 xz,别的没了,然后一直催。我真服了。做了一次就走了。没心情了。一般我不会说老师的,三百五百块钱无所谓 可是这个真过分了,颜值不符,身材不符就算了,起码你服务对的起你要的5k这个价格吧,兄弟们避雷吧 骗子TG @fednrksz
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @szleibaopaizi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳骗子曝光” (@szleibaopaizi), 3,018 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szleibaopaizi.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.