Channel
@szhaocaimao3
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,293subscribers
+1,042 since we began measuring on 16 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1004451457895 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szhaocaimao3 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2026 and 12 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 16 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 15 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 15 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szhaocaimao3 |
Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 18 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 69% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Sept 2026, 10:00 | 1,293 | +39 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 12:38 | 1,254 | +43 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 10:17 | 1,211 | +16 |
| 2 Sept 2026, 03:37 | 1,195 | +23 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 18:36 | 1,172 | +28 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 23:06 | 1,144 | +29 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 06:38 | 1,115 | +526 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:28 | 589 | +338 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 02:00 | 251 | no change |
| 16 Aug 2026, 01:45 | 251 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 12 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 4 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 66.7% | |
| 🫡 | 2 | 33.3% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 12 August 2026 to 16 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🎰 贤时局白嫖抽奖第十九波 📮 参与条件： 🎫 加入-招财猫（重生版）的频道 🎫 加入-萝莉🫧岛 🎫 加入-韩佳怡的频道 🎫 加入-慧慧的频道 🎫 加入-重庆贤者时间规划局 └ 🎟️ 发言数大于 1 条 🎫 加入-雾都逼友の谈 🎁 奖品内容： 💰️ 幼兮1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 慧慧1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 招财猫1P白嫖劵 × 1 💰️ 韩佳怡1P白嫖劵 × 1 ⚠️ 抽奖说明： 贤时局白嫖抽奖第十九波 总计73个自营老师已参与，感谢支持 1.老师生理期不同，中奖后在3个开课日兑奖；过期不侯，不得买卖、转让！ 2.退出频道、炸号，不予兑换。 3.中奖后凭获奖信息自行联系老师兑奖，要求反馈评价，以报告或锐评形式给出。 4.如遇兑奖过期、炸号等状况，经老师确认后，老师的白嫖劵流入群内活跃度抽奖，按相应规定即时抽出。 韩佳怡 @hanjiayia1 招财猫 @szhaocaimao 慧慧 @T_ti_mi 幼兮…
💯 车评系统 | 评价模版 当前模版 【时间】：2026-08-15 【老师】：招财猫 【留名】：匿名 【人照】：8 【颜值】：8 【身材】：8 【服务】：9 【态度】：9 【环境】：8 【报告出处】：重庆封神榜：https://t.me/fsbbyq666 【过程】：地址珠江，环境一般，可能晚上的珠江会好点。开门进去，人照8分，还是耐看的，身材好，奈奈大而且挺，进门简单寒暄一下，不会感到尴尬，然后开始洗澡，有陪浴，浴室就开始play了，一直rua着大奈奈，浴室有口，口活不错无齿感，洗完擦干去床上，ab面服务，跟会所服务差不多了，课表有的都有，过程这样那样，先传教，再后入，呃呃呃啊，一直夺，一直rua奈奈，服务系老师确实不一样，具体涩涩过程省略100字，总的来说还是值得推荐的
新人开课，高挑型大长腿， 天然大胸有C，可双飞，可3p， 可拍照，可录像，会所式服务一流！ 私聊: @szhaocaimao 双向机器人: @szhaocaimaoBOT
新人开课，高挑型大长腿， 天然大胸有C，可双飞，可3p， 可拍照，可录像，会所式服务一流！ 私聊: @szhaocaimao 双向机器人: @szhaocaimaoBOT
还有空位！
新人开课，高挑型大长腿， 天然大胸有C，可双飞，可3p， 可拍照，可录像，会所式服务一流！ 私聊: @szhaocaimao 双向机器人: @szhaocaimaoBOT
❤3
【重庆】https://t.me/szhaocaimao3 【老师艺名】招财猫 【车 牌】@szhaocaimao 【留 名】DaftPunk 【水 费】抽奖400P 【颜 值】6/10 【硬件评分】8/10 【服务/态度】 810 【推荐程度】8/10 【老师情况】：自营 【服务内容】： 优点： 1、服务态度好，猫猫老师很温柔，人妻感很足，进门就嘘寒问暖，主动拥抱，工作室收拾得很干净，也没有纹身，良家感很足； 2、猫猫老师身材非常好，168左右身高，目测体重在50KG上下，C+，而且还没有什么小肚子，可以说这个身材属于是非常匀称，肉都长在该长的地方，猫猫老师还说自己长胖了。后入的时候属于腰臀比无敌，日感特别好； 3、之前看评价，猫猫老师口活很好，今日一试果然名不虚传，差点直接给我口下课了，猫猫老师口活虽然有一点齿感，但是老师优势就是对舌头的运用，舌头包着水在嘴里闪转…
https://t.me/+sbg8eEvJvVcxMDVl
私信:： @szhaocaimao 双向机器人:： @szhaocaimaoBOT 频道照片： https://t.me/szhaocaimao3
🫡1
以前的账号登陆不上去了，这是重生版的新号，约课联系这个！
🫡1
【重庆狼友聚集大队】https://t.me/xzq520 【老师艺名】招财猫 【车 牌】@zhaocaimaoa1 【留 名】佳期如梦 【水 费】600 【颜 值】8.5 【硬件评分】8.5 【服务/态度】 9.5 【推荐程度】9 【老师情况】：态度好、服务好、日感好 【服务内容】：约了招财猫老师晚课，兴奋前往，进门看见老师穿着性感的短裙，很骚气，共浴时候，老师就开始吹箫，很舒服，老师咪咪浑圆、又挺又软，抓起来就爱不释手。洗完上床，服务更是霸道，过水漫游，吸皮，毒龙，胸推一样不少，翻过来，老师抓着鸡儿就开始口，口技霸道，一会儿深喉、一会儿旋转，一面享受老师的口，一面摸老师下面，洪水泛滥，老师口技了得，吹了能有7，8分钟，属实安逸，带上雨伞老师直接坐上来，大力摇动，御姐战斗力确实了得，换了多个姿势，最后一泄如注，共浴后满意离开，很爽的一次出击经历。
❤1
贤时局：https://t.me/cqcdbureau 老师：招财猫 @zhaocaimaoa1 逼友：干馏杂酱不加葱 @heinu945 颜值：8 身材：9 服务：8.8 态度：10 细节正文： 中奖白嫖，果断出击，由于之前就约过，而且妹子本身就比较开朗、外向，所以一点都不生份，很热情，不公式化、不做作。人照7、8分像，照片有轻度美颜磨皮，真人很耐看，甜美御姐。身材匀称，真实身高165左右，腰肚无赘肉，小腹平坦紧实，🐻器亮眼，应该有D，手感无敌，全身皮肤光滑、有弹性。腰细腿长，屁股稍显干巴了一点，多点肉的话，就完美了。服务和菜单一致，项目时长足够，毒龙顶肛不敷衍，口的吮吸力度很大，差点交代。可能是因为头课的原因，女上很紧，娇喘和身体反馈比较真实，配合度不错。 不喜欢写嗯嗯啊啊的小黄文，真实描述妹子特点，不喜勿喷。 总结：五星好评，好身材，一眼看得见。 价格：6P/11PP 车牌： @zhaocaimaoa1 综合评分：…
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @szhaocaimao3. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“招财猫（重生版）的频道” (@szhaocaimao3), 1,293 subscribers as measured 15 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szhaocaimao3.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.