前有方羽 后有宣萱 一个900涨1200在涨到1500 一个900涨1500在涨到2200 不做账号备注,以防推广之嫌
❤1

Channel
@szgg4210
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,520subscribers
-32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1003067219395 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @szgg4210 |
| Created | Between 1 August 2025 and 18 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/szgg4210 |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 05:56 | 1,520 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:45 | 1,521 | -6 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 1,527 | -7 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 15:28 | 1,534 | -9 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 20:43 | 1,543 | -6 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 17:38 | 1,549 | -4 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:57 | 1,553 | +2 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 08:05 | 1,551 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 21:32 | 1,552 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:02 | 1,552 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 18 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 25 March 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
24 reactions across 10 posts, in 1 kind.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 24 | 100.0% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 September 2025 to 25 March 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
前有方羽 后有宣萱 一个900涨1200在涨到1500 一个900涨1500在涨到2200 不做账号备注,以防推广之嫌
❤1
东莞鸡怎么都喜欢涨价
呱呱坠地 俺又来咯
深圳第一瓜 pinned «投稿热线: @guaguatg_bot»
投稿热线: @guaguatg_bot
❤1
兄弟们等我搞一下模版和机器人,这个频道我看有全国各地的粉丝,那就可以投稿全国的雷。
❤3
第一瓜要不要也改成投稿雷师雷学生频道,那就开干。
其实还有一个很有意思的群组: 深圳学院 https://t.me/sz0755 很神奇,前身为楚枫力推老师龙华UU的频道群组,在上个月摇身一变,为深圳学院群组频道,如果龙华UU卖掉了,那应该不至于还挂尾巴。 该群组对外宣传完全免费,但是让本瓜疑惑的是,该群组已经上定制机器人,这是一笔开销,且被极搜收录,极搜黄色频道及群组需要支付保险,这些都是需要付出一些代价的。 如果该群组完全免费,那么所谓的院长真的是业内菩萨了。 那么让我们敬请期待,该群组的以后发展趋势。
❤4
沧海哥不要改名字啊 @tkhz01 现在怎么又卖百岁山
俏佳人群已恢复正常,搬砖人 @abtmchovery 回归,现在在收拢群组,后续估计也是收费收割老师。
其实本瓜好奇的是,一个老师每天的在线时长超过10个小时,然后一会一个发言手法,线上热热闹闹,线下壁话没有。 正如这个沧海一声笑的哥们所说,不知道那句话是真是假。 有人可以回答一下本瓜吗?
@mimi6896 开始人身攻击,笑死人; 老友会开始翻账本,准备踢掉不听话的老师。 另附玩偶妹妹身份信息。
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @szgg4210. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 399,384 of 1,630,085 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@szgg4210 named 3 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“深圳第一瓜” (@szgg4210), 1,520 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szgg4210.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.