朋友们小心新冠,中招了还挺难受

Channel
杭州吃瓜台(赛博垃圾仓)
@publicgua111
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
5,466subscribers
-88 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002203925207 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @publicgua111 |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 2 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 2 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/publicgua111 |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 11:16 | 5,466 | -16 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 14:06 | 5,482 | -11 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 07:57 | 5,493 | -13 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 02:27 | 5,506 | -15 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 05:25 | 5,521 | -10 |
| 17 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 5,531 | -2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 03:58 | 5,533 | -5 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 01:18 | 5,538 | -12 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:57 | 5,550 | -4 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:01 | 5,554 | first reading |
Engagement
18 posts held, back to 28 August 2025 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 7 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 15 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
155 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 78 | 50.3% | |
| 👍 | 49 | 31.6% | |
| 🤡 | 17 | 11.0% | |
| 💩 | 6 | 3.87% | |
| 😭 | 3 | 1.94% | |
| 👏 | 2 | 1.29% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 155 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 28 August 2025 to 15 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Recent posts
朋友们小心台风!
还是要注意身体健康,少熬夜多休息。不然像张雪峰和onlyfans老板那样也太可惜了 ps:弄了个机器人看看能不能弄死广告哥,再弄不了就要向他们投降了
❤5
香港的楼凤文化真是让人瞠目结舌😶
大伙2026快乐
❤2
Sticker, posted without a caption
滚滚长江东逝水,晚上时间短,我们补上黑坑雷右护法太一的故事。(@Shanximm)太一本来是黑叉子上的玩的,(我大发慈悲帮她隐去大号吧)以前问她多少钱还矜持的很,中间消失了一段时间(生娃去了?),后来可能是因为养孩子压力大,彻底放飞了自我,刚来TG直接开2000P(涨了500),自称太原第一口活,可能是靠性技巧豢养了一只有恋丑癖的小狼狗,(@beast1412k)据说正为了迎娶此女奋发读书,别人不能说太一丑,这狗狗会扑你身上乱咬。经过受害者在群中跟他们的对峙和我后来换号的多方打探,太一是因为受害者在接受服务时超时了,可我看受害者跟她并不是只接触了一次,并且据我所知受害者在事后还给她补了钱。其他的我真的是不想打字了,大家自己看照片吧,我喷她是因为她这个质量对不对的起她要那个门槛,狼友们自己做评判吧。250/520口令问价,谁过谁傻逼。(图片出自受害者频道 https://t.me/LBYWCN )
❤8
有人投稿我转发一下
Voice message, posted without a caption
接受一个投稿啊,内容太长你们有兴趣的可以自己听一下 我说一下我听的大致内容: 女仆妹妹在上钟期间在反对的情况下被客人强行插入,店家找客人要赔偿然后给女仆妹妹和稀泥。 女仆妹妹还在那边跟店家说希望店家管理一下店里其他人,不要再给这么大的尺度了,导致其他人都受影响,然后店家巴拉巴拉的。 听完下来就是: 客人有点下作 店家就和稀泥(想让客人花5000补偿女仆) 女仆妹妹有点窝囊,就这样了还在跟店家这个平台这样交流,这么高的法抗你整他啊
❤2
这个死🐎狼堡又来打广告了,不知道死🐎幼女广告什么时候回来😅😅😅
深圳那个大蜜蜜有点意思啊,看看会演变成什么情况 对于这个灰黑行业,可以看看nga的一个帖子 “泛擦边行业考察纪实”。 大人,时代变了 另附瓜全过程:https://t.me/szgg4210
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @publicgua111. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 2
- handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 2
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@publicgua111 named 2 handles that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
named in 2 posts, 8 August 2026 – 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“杭州吃瓜台(赛博垃圾仓)” (@publicgua111), 5,466 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/publicgua111.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.