Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 优优的小窝(重生版)

Channel

优优的小窝(重生版)

@szftuu520

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

86subscribers

+77 since we began measuring on 1 September 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004297491175
TypeChannel
Username@szftuu520
Created31 August 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded1 September 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/szftuu520

Growth

98647.51 September 2026 — 9 subscribers2 September 2026 — 27 subscribers11 September 2026 — 86 subscribers1 September 202611 September 2026
3 measurements spanning 10 days, net +77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 00:3986+59
2 Sept 2026, 08:0427+18
1 Sept 2026, 09:009first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 31 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.8%
avg views ÷ 86 subscribers
Avg views / post
48.0
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
this channel exposes no reaction counts
Posts in window
5
of 5 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 September 2026
Posts held5 (31 August 20261 September 2026)
Views total144
Reactions total
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken1 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
14s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Recent posts

1 Sept 2026, 07:33 UTC30 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

周四开课,哥哥们到时候不见不散🥰 因为之前号被封了,之前有中奖的哥哥重新联系优优哈

31 Aug 2026, 08:01 UTC58 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

之前的号被封了😭 这周可以开课了噢,哥哥们快来找优优。 附上库存照片

31 Aug 2026, 07:34 UTC56 viewsread 1 September 2026
Photo

课表:我是优优 学妹一枚,初下海请各位哥哥多多关照呀! 净身高166纯天然真b+ 07年生18岁,80斤 服务内容: 鸳鸯浴🛁,水中萧,🐍吻,🈚️T口,丝袜诱惑,口爆 1000一課45分钟 1800两課90分钟 包✌️4288不限次晚12-早10 个人介绍:本人初下海,不太懂那些专业用词,但都会配合哥哥,让哥哥全程体验女友式服务!可纯可欲可甜可咸,听话乖巧懂配合感。情趣制服透惑 指滑 调情 鸳鸯共浴 高跟丝袜.舔胸态度好不催! 禁无套 禁吃药 禁变态 口嗨骗子勿扰

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @szftuu520. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“优优的小窝(重生版)” (@szftuu520), 86 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szftuu520.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.