Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 苏州大学公开榜

Channel

苏州大学公开榜

@szdxgkb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

23,396subscribers

-419 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004457872775
TypeChannel
Username@szdxgkb
Description主群链接🔗:https://t.me/szsu3333
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 7 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 November 2026
Measurements held59
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/szdxgkb

Topic

Adult — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 70% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

23,39625,02624,2118 August 2026 — 23,815 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,815 subscribers8 August 2026 — 23,817 subscribers9 August 2026 — 23,835 subscribers10 August 2026 — 23,850 subscribers11 August 2026 — 23,871 subscribers12 August 2026 — 23,895 subscribers13 August 2026 — 23,909 subscribers15 August 2026 — 23,941 subscribers16 August 2026 — 23,935 subscribers18 August 2026 — 23,955 subscribers19 August 2026 — 23,958 subscribers21 August 2026 — 23,976 subscribers22 August 2026 — 23,991 subscribers24 August 2026 — 23,969 subscribers25 August 2026 — 23,978 subscribers26 August 2026 — 24,085 subscribers27 August 2026 — 24,112 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24,083 subscribers29 August 2026 — 24,058 subscribers30 August 2026 — 24,030 subscribers31 August 2026 — 24,023 subscribers1 September 2026 — 24,024 subscribers2 September 2026 — 24,016 subscribers3 September 2026 — 24,032 subscribers5 September 2026 — 24,016 subscribers8 September 2026 — 23,970 subscribers11 September 2026 — 23,948 subscribers13 September 2026 — 23,917 subscribers14 September 2026 — 23,910 subscribers16 September 2026 — 23,901 subscribers18 September 2026 — 24,928 subscribers25 September 2026 — 25,026 subscribers4 October 2026 — 24,848 subscribers8 October 2026 — 24,775 subscribers13 October 2026 — 24,821 subscribers14 October 2026 — 24,845 subscribers15 October 2026 — 24,859 subscribers16 October 2026 — 24,850 subscribers17 October 2026 — 24,870 subscribers18 October 2026 — 24,800 subscribers19 October 2026 — 24,682 subscribers20 October 2026 — 24,644 subscribers21 October 2026 — 24,475 subscribers22 October 2026 — 24,248 subscribers23 October 2026 — 24,153 subscribers24 October 2026 — 23,988 subscribers25 October 2026 — 23,981 subscribers26 October 2026 — 23,941 subscribers27 October 2026 — 23,897 subscribers28 October 2026 — 23,835 subscribers29 October 2026 — 23,820 subscribers30 October 2026 — 23,699 subscribers31 October 2026 — 23,650 subscribers1 November 2026 — 23,603 subscribers2 November 2026 — 23,593 subscribers3 November 2026 — 23,559 subscribers4 November 2026 — 23,526 subscribers5 November 2026 — 23,396 subscribers8 August 20265 November 2026
59 measurements spanning 89 days, net -419. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23,152–25,271 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 59
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Nov 2026, 12:2923,396-130
4 Nov 2026, 09:0023,526-33
3 Nov 2026, 08:3023,559-34
2 Nov 2026, 11:5523,593-10
1 Nov 2026, 11:5923,603-47
31 Oct 2026, 12:4623,650-49
30 Oct 2026, 16:0023,699-121
29 Oct 2026, 16:2623,820-15
28 Oct 2026, 15:5923,835-62
27 Oct 2026, 15:5123,897-44
26 Oct 2026, 16:0823,941-40
25 Oct 2026, 16:1723,981-7
24 Oct 2026, 17:2823,988-165
23 Oct 2026, 16:3024,153-95
22 Oct 2026, 19:0824,248-227
21 Oct 2026, 15:3724,475-169
20 Oct 2026, 10:3924,644-38
19 Oct 2026, 12:0624,682-118
18 Oct 2026, 10:4124,800-70
17 Oct 2026, 09:1524,870first reading

Engagement

73 posts held, back to 7 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 117 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.94%
avg views ÷ 23,396 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,620
23 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.101%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
23
of 73 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 23 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 1 November 2026
Posts held73 (7 August 2026 – 1 November 2026)
Views total37,360
Reactions total31
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 02:22 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
929
Videos
168
Links
204

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
6m 31s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 36 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

74 reactions across 42 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 94.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤7094.6%
👍34.05%
😍11.35%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 52 of the 73 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 74 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 73 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 1 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 1 of 23 posts held from the last 30 days (4.35%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

1 Nov 2026, 12:07 UTC≈1,250 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

共 0 条车评,综合评价分 0 好评 0% 中评率 0% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#西西吴中 联系方式: @zxy123zxy 老师地区:#吴中区 老师价格:#600P #1100PP 老师类型:#嫩妹 老师服务:#舌吻,#69,#调情,#陪浴 评价西西吴中 • 全部评价

❤2

1 Nov 2026, 08:07 UTC≈1,240 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

共 1 条车评,综合评价分 8.65 好评 100% 中评率 0% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#曦曦 联系方式: @ainuhuq 老师地区:#姑苏区 老师价格:#600P #800PP 老师类型:#嫩妹 老师服务:#舌吻,#69,#调情,#深喉,#陪浴 评价曦曦 • 全部评价

❤2

30 Oct 2026, 14:08 UTC≈1,770 views2 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

共 2 条车评,综合评价分 9 好评 100% 中评率 0% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#小芯 联系方式: @yuanyuanbb66 老师地区:#姑苏区 老师价格:#600P #1200PP 老师类型:#嫩妹 老师服务:#舌吻,#69,#调情,#陪浴 评价小芯 • 全部评价

❤2

26 Oct 2026, 10:49 UTC≈3,080 views1 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

共 2 条车评,综合评价分 6.88 好评 0% 中评率 100% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#恋恋姑苏 联系方式: @ghvhvjf 老师地区:#姑苏区 老师价格:#400P #800PP 老师类型:#嫩妹 老师服务:#舌吻,#69,#臀推,#陪浴 评价恋恋姑苏 • 全部评价

❤1

26 Oct 2026, 06:54 UTC937 views3 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

共 1 条车评,综合评价分 9 好评 100% 中评率 0% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#慕幕然 联系方式: @yanxixill 老师地区:#相城区 老师价格:#500P #900PP 老师类型:#嫩妹 老师服务:#舌吻,#调情,#制服,#丝袜 评价慕幕然 • 全部评价

❤3

26 Oct 2026, 05:44 UTC952 views2 reactionsread 28 October 2026

白金瀚莞式★半套★全裸5T 服务尺度天花板(远非92场所可比) 🔥 至尊享受💯帝王体验 🔥 👍 一对一模式💯莞式服务 👍 💎 项目众多“师”资雄厚 💎 🔣 莞式一对一 5T服务 🔣 😍 高素质 高颜值超年轻 😍 🈚️定金🈚️套路👍诚信靠谱 🏰环境私密舒适给您带来 最畅快的体验(超级隐私㊙️) 主打顶端的服务现场挑选模式 妹妹年纪96~05之间,可亲可摸可舔可柔;还可射在妹子身上 出水不限次数时间50分钟 服务流程: 吸皮过💦;漫游;🐍漫;👃息;毒🐲;💅滑;🐻推;🐍舔;👅蛋蛋;盘🐲绕;猴子偷🍑;海底捞🌙;蛟龙出海🐲(部分妹子有绝活,个人绝技,请自行开发)最后 胸推🐻 臀推🍑 毛推🐱 手推👋 四选一出货都想体验就和技师说好,避免时间不足玩的不尽兴服务时间50分钟出货不限次数,无限火力,发射了妹子继续服务(如需出2~3次请和提前妹子说明) 原价💰699预约价💰350 👍诚信经营不打虚假广告👍 营业时间 12:00~02:00 电报客…

❤2

26 Oct 2026, 02:12 UTC≈1,020 viewsread 28 October 2026

因收到多起投诉举报,我们不得不做出这个艰难决定。近期发现有部分同学使用机器人刷水群,本该属于认真参与群内活动同学的奖励,反而被机器人抢占。 现正式开启投诉核查功能:一经核实存在机器人水群行为,账号内所有奖励、积分、学分将全部清空。 同时针对恶意、无意义水群:举报经核实有效,举报人奖励50学分;被举报人首次予以警告,第二次直接禁言。请大家自觉遵守规则,诚信参与。

23 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC≈1,860 views3 reactionsread 28 October 2026
Photo

共 4 条车评,综合评价分 9.66 好评 100% 中评率 0% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#诗瑜 联系方式: @shiyu_520 老师地区:#园区 老师价格:#800P #1600PP 老师类型:#御姐 老师服务:#69,#胸推,#调情,#制服,#丝袜,#高跟鞋 评价诗瑜 • 全部评价

❤3

23 Oct 2026, 04:00 UTC796 viewsread 24 October 2026

🎉🎉🎉 开奖通知 🎉🎉🎉 🔖 防伪编号:H179212985602 🎰 校长继续撒币! ⚠️ 抽奖说明: 开奖48小时内联系 管理小天领奖 超时作废 中奖者该名无效 💁 参与情况:58达标 / 112报名 🎅 联系领奖:@SZDX1111 1. 四姨不师 奖品:100现金 2. 屌的一逼 奖品:100现金 3. 满船清梦 压星河 奖品:学分100 4. Sun Sky 奖品:学分100 5. 爱吃点心的椰子壳 奖品:学分100 6. 吴 日 天 (停更了... 奖品:学分100 7. 小聋堡 奖品:学分100 祝大家心想事成好运连连!

22 Oct 2026, 13:14 UTC931 views2 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

共 1 条车评,综合评价分 9 好评 100% 中评率 0% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#染染 联系方式: @ranran8521 老师地区:#姑苏区 老师价格:#700P #1400PP 老师类型:#嫩妹 老师服务:#69,#胸推,#臀推,#漫游,#深喉,#舌吻 评价染染 • 全部评价

❤1👍1

22 Oct 2026, 13:07 UTC813 views1 reactionsread 24 October 2026
Photo

共 1 条车评,综合评价分 7.88 好评 0% 中评率 100% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#迪迪 联系方式: @didi13148888 老师地区:#吴中区 老师价格:#600P #1200PP 老师类型:#嫩妹 老师服务:#舌吻,#制服,#丝袜,#高跟鞋 评价迪迪 • 全部评价

👍1

21 Oct 2026, 12:23 UTC≈1,130 viewsread 24 October 2026
Photo

共 3 条车评,综合评价分 8.38 好评 67% 中评率 33% 差评率 0% 老师名称:#小米苏 联系方式: @wacb0001 老师地区:#姑苏区 老师价格:#800P #1500PP 老师类型:#嫩妹 老师服务:#舌吻,#69,#胸推,#乳交,#制服,#丝袜 评价小米苏 • 全部评价

Showing the 12 most recent of 73 posts we hold for @szdxgkb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@szdxgkb edited 3 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
29 August 2026
Most recent edit
3 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 9 posts on @szdxgkb as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
9 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 October 2026
Median time before seen missing
30 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“苏州大学公开榜” (@szdxgkb), 23,396 subscribers as measured 5 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szdxgkb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.