Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 反叛的频道

Channel

反叛的频道

@szbgf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

345subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003996581334
TypeChannel
Username@szbgf
CreatedBetween 1 April 2026 and 31 July 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 August 2026
Measurements held2
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/szbgf

Growth

345346345.58 Aug 2026, 23:45 — 346 subscribers9 Aug 2026, 13:21 — 345 subscribers8 Aug 2026, 23:459 Aug 2026, 13:21
2 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 345–346 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Aug 2026, 13:21345-1
8 Aug 2026, 23:45346first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
40.1%
avg views ÷ 345 subscribers
Avg views / post
138
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.59%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 19 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 7 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 8 August 2026
Posts held19 (7 August 20268 August 2026)
Views total2,630
Reactions total26
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Aug 2026, 23:45 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

26 reactions across 7 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1350.0%
👍1246.2%
👻13.85%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 12:49 UTC101 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

封禁

👍1

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

8 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC110 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

没有人反馈吗?😭

👍1

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

8 Aug 2026, 11:49 UTC155 viewsread 8 August 2026

人工 擦边本 尊敬的客服你您好!该用户存在极其恶劣危害青少年行为,在作品发布大量青年少女穿着擦边服饰扭腰跳舞等低俗内容,此类视频严重危害快手社区环境,长期发布jk包臀裙等服斾刻意跳舞从而大尺度的动作露胸肚脐扭腰动作,引露丝袜对观众发出挑逗动让人郁郁昏昏发生性理念的念头,此类服斾以及动作极易诱导未成年人发生性侵害不可观的性理念该行严重违反快手社区规范,若长期发表此类违法有害内容污染社区环境并危害青少年身心健康必将让多数青少年误入歧途,恳请客服按照快手平台规定对该账号作品全部下架并永久封禁管制! 打掉反馈 @bgfcnm 频道 https://t.me/szbgf

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

8 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC119 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

回想😍

3👍1

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

8 Aug 2026, 09:36 UTC123 views1 reactionsread 8 August 2026

没人评论那我就不写了 双向可以在这里评论 @bgfcnm_bot

👍1

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

8 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTC202 viewsread 8 August 2026
Poll

继续送飞机号还是写文本

  1. 送号37%
  2. 写文本81%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

8 Aug 2026, 03:08 UTC199 views16 reactionsread 8 August 2026

表情到十个发飞机号

10👍5👻1

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

8 Aug 2026, 02:46 UTC158 viewsread 8 August 2026
Photo

发现抖音做人真不行

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

8 Aug 2026, 02:23 UTC95 viewsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @ls508520

评论区扣一 抽两个人送飞机号 https://t.me/ls508520

Signed 反叛 礼物/星星/典藏品代购

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @szbgf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

8 Aug 2026, 04:45 UTCAnonymous Poll52 voters

继续送飞机号还是写文本

  1. 送号37%
  2. 写文本81%

The shares total 118%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 8 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 17,366 of 1,481,243entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“反叛的频道” (@szbgf), 345 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/szbgf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.