Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Светлана Гузаевская: советская методика русского языка

Channel

Светлана Гузаевская: советская методика русского языка

@system_rus

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,181subscribers

+70 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001575422830
TypeChannel
Username@system_rus
DescriptionВам не кажется: по современной методике грамотности не будет. Советская методика русского языка — учебники, курсы, готовые уроки для 1–4 классов. Родителям и педагогам. Автор @guzaevskaya
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/system_rus

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

8,0888,1978,142.57 August 2026 — 8,111 subscribers7 August 2026 — 8,111 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,105 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,108 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,106 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,103 subscribers24 August 2026 — 8,098 subscribers27 August 2026 — 8,097 subscribers30 August 2026 — 8,096 subscribers2 September 2026 — 8,088 subscribers8 September 2026 — 8,089 subscribers12 September 2026 — 8,107 subscribers16 September 2026 — 8,116 subscribers30 September 2026 — 8,124 subscribers7 October 2026 — 8,164 subscribers13 October 2026 — 8,169 subscribers16 October 2026 — 8,167 subscribers19 October 2026 — 8,161 subscribers22 October 2026 — 8,174 subscribers25 October 2026 — 8,190 subscribers27 October 2026 — 8,197 subscribers31 October 2026 — 8,194 subscribers3 November 2026 — 8,188 subscribers5 November 2026 — 8,177 subscribers9 November 2026 — 8,181 subscribers8,1817 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 94 days, net +70. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,072–8,213 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 04:118,181+4
5 Nov 2026, 14:468,177-11
3 Nov 2026, 00:468,188-6
31 Oct 2026, 04:378,194-3
27 Oct 2026, 18:568,197+7
25 Oct 2026, 04:008,190+16
22 Oct 2026, 12:508,174+13
19 Oct 2026, 07:358,161-6
16 Oct 2026, 09:298,167-2
13 Oct 2026, 02:288,169+5
7 Oct 2026, 03:178,164+40
30 Sept 2026, 13:408,124+8
16 Sept 2026, 12:388,116+9
12 Sept 2026, 09:568,107+18
8 Sept 2026, 07:378,089+1
2 Sept 2026, 20:428,088-8
30 Aug 2026, 11:278,096-1
27 Aug 2026, 07:388,097-1
24 Aug 2026, 18:188,098-5
20 Aug 2026, 19:458,103first reading

Engagement

105 posts held, back to 23 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 38 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.86%
avg views ÷ 8,181 subscribers
Avg views / post
807
31 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.83%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
31
of 105 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 30 of 31 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 November 2026
Posts held105 (23 July 2026 – 10 November 2026)
Views total25,002
Reactions total681
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken11 Nov 2026, 02:06 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈2,870
Videos
≈310
Links
≈1,070

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 11 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
1m 50s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,229 reactions across 102 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,04847.0%
🔥60827.3%
👍26411.8%
🙏1858.30%
😱351.57%
🤯351.57%
😢331.48%
👏80.359%
🥰80.359%
👎30.135%
😁10.045%
🤩10.045%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 102 of the 105 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,229 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 10 of 31 posts held from the last 30 days (32.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

10 Nov 2026, 08:52 UTC332 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Разобраться, где наука, а где лженаука, не так просто. На последнем эфире я рассказывала о влиянии лженаучного учения Марра на методику обучения русскому языку. Но внимание к синтаксису тоже было обусловлено влиянием идей Марра... Вообще методика — это сплошные контрасты и споры. Запись эфира можно приобрести по ссылке https://systemrus.pro/Uchebnik_Kostina_dlja_4_klassa

❤12

9 Nov 2026, 04:20 UTC564 views20 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Вчера в псевдодискуссии в чате моя оппонент сослалась на сатирика Михаила Задорнова. Не знаю, в курсе ли вы, но Задорнов был не только сатириком, но и лжеученым. Из своей шовинистской идеи о превосходстве русской нации над всеми прочими автор вывел и теорию о русском языке как праязыке, породившем все другие языки. Много-много лет назад, в 2008 году, М. Задорнов был приглашен на телешоу "Гордон-Кихот", организованное…

👍14❤2😱2👎1🤯1

9 Nov 2026, 03:37 UTC548 views13 reactionsread 11 November 2026
File

Что у нас есть для объяснения слов. Статья из журнала "Начальная школа"

❤13

8 Nov 2026, 16:20 UTC654 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Это о курсе "Учимся грамоте по букварю Академии педнаук". Старт 25 декабря.

❤8

8 Nov 2026, 10:52 UTC≈1,600 views36 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

У меня не то что аргументов, а слов нет. Поэтому я просто буду цитировать и спрашивать вас, как нам жить дальше. Растениеводство — наука о том, что растёт на земле. Рожь — злак, похожий на траву, но с большими колосьями. Из него делают чёрный хлеб. Это нужно, чтобы у всех были бутерброды. Хлопок-сырец — белые пушистые шарики на кустах, которые ещё не очистили. Крестьяне собирают их, чтобы потом сделать ткань, а из…

🤯26👍5👎2🔥2❤1

8 Nov 2026, 05:44 UTC759 views24 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Атрибуты занятий по обучению чтению и письму: касса букв, указка. И радость детей и взрослых. Пишет Дарья: Здравствуйте. Хочу поделиться успехами. Весь прошлый год учили с ребятами буквы (им было по 5 лет) очень сложно шел процесс запоминания. Придумывала фонетические сказки, различные игры. Буквы лепили, печатали… Но было очень трудно. В этом году идем по методике АПН. И дети зачитали! Они сами очень радуются успех…

❤16🔥8

7 Nov 2026, 03:49 UTC792 views32 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤30🔥2

6 Nov 2026, 14:13 UTC739 views8 reactionsread 11 November 2026

Закончились ранние продажи курса "Учимся грамоте по букварю Академии педнаук". Старт 25 декабря. Записаться в список предзаписи, чтобы не пропустить следующее окно https://systemrus.pro/uchimsya_gramote

👍7❤1

6 Nov 2026, 14:02 UTC613 views14 reactionsread 11 November 2026

1 класс, у нас тут модули, так что одни каникулы уже даже и прошли. Я с зимнего потока Букваря АПН, к июню дошли с сыном почти до конца 2 букварного. Эти занятия очень ощущаются! Я бесконечно благодарна. И письмо, и разбор предложений/слов, эти понятия хорошо укрепились. Описание картинок простыми предложениями очень уважаю. В школе недавно писали первый диктант, ребёнок написал отлично) Вообще хотела на программу 1-…

🔥14

6 Nov 2026, 10:50 UTC674 views38 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Здравствуйте. Работаю сейчас в 1 классе по букварю Редозубова и параллельно прохожу ваши курсы. И почему раньше не узнала об этой методике. Действительно, раньше составляли звуковые схемы, наряжали звуковичков, а времени почитать совсем не оставалось. Пустая трата времени. А про работу с кассой буквой так и вообще забыли. А как полезна эта работа!!!!! Я работаю и балдею от этого. В хорошем смысле. И первые диктанты п…

🔥25❤13

6 Nov 2026, 04:57 UTC688 views12 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

О "проверочном" (нет) слове "лоск" для "полоскать" мне рассказала в прошлом году коллега: увидела этот плакат в классе своего ребенка. Примечательно, что на слайде перед вами издание 1994 года, а в кабинете висел плакат новенький. Неужели за столько лет никто не захотел исправить? Неверные проверочные слова я встречала и в пособиях Ахременковой (шествовать — шест, но это кагбэ для проверки согласных), и в пособиях З…

❤12

6 Nov 2026, 04:50 UTC701 views9 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

Продолжаю читать П.П. Иванова. Этот фрагмент уже цитировала — на одном из прошлогодних вебинаров по II классу.

👍6❤3

Showing the 12 most recent of 105 posts we hold for @system_rus. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@system_rus edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 November 2026
Most recent edit
9 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 3 posts on @system_rus as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
3 days
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

2 Nov 2026, 13:22 UTCAnonymous Poll220 voters

Телеграм и/или Макс для поддержки на курсах?

  1. Только телеграм, Макса нет49%
  2. Можно и телеграм, и Макс42%
  3. Посмотреть9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 105 most recent posts we hold, published 23 July 2026 to 10 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Мазина Вероника Дмитриевна
@mazinavd · 20,948
Telegram ranks this channel #4 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 25 September 2026
Советские учебники
@sovuche · 106,311
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 21 August 2026
Почерк. Чистописание. Calligraphy_ok
@calligraphy_ok · 22,885
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 19 September 2026
Проходим курсы, читаем книги, тренинги и спорт
@books_and_trainings · 29,757
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 8 September 2026
Педагоги России
@u4itelskaja · 21,270
Telegram ranks this channel #28 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 September 2026
НейроДом🏡
@NeiroDom · 20,787
Telegram ranks this channel #73 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 26 September 2026
Шамиль Ахмадуллин | УМНОШКОЛА
@shamilahmadullin · 177,175
Telegram ranks this channel #75 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 12 August 2026
СЕМЕЙНОЕ ОБРАЗОВАНИЕ ДЛЯ ЧАЙНИКОВ
@co_legko · 62,790
Telegram ranks this channel #76 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 August 2026
Юлия Нефёдова. Уроки русского
@uunefedova_russ · 56,210
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 23 August 2026
Умный ребенок
@umniyrebenok100 · 35,801
Telegram ranks this channel #79 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 1 September 2026

This channel appears in 10 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Светлана Гузаевская: советская методика русского языка” (@system_rus), 8,181 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/system_rus.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.