4 measurements spanning 9 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,037–6,040 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
15 Aug 2026, 20:14
6,040
+3
9 Aug 2026, 22:11
6,037
-2
6 Aug 2026, 13:01
6,039
+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:35
6,038
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
9.22%
avg views ÷ 6,040 subscribers
Avg views / post
557
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.54%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held
15 (30 July 2026 – 10 August 2026)
Views total
8,355
Reactions total
122
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 03:35 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
7m 40s
Average length
1m 06s
Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
122 reactions across 14 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
54
44.3%
❤
33
27.0%
🔥
23
18.9%
🤝
8
6.56%
🎉
4
3.28%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 122reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
#сингента
#соя
🌱 Что вы увезете с «Главных по сое», кроме впечатлений?
На «Главных по сое» вы сможете:
✅ сравнить 88 сортов сои, выращенных в одинаковых полевых условиях
✅ получить рекомендации по подбору сортов для ваших задач
✅ увидеть результаты применения современных технологий защиты растений
✅ обсудить с техническими экспертами практические вопросы
✅ узнать об опыте коллег из разных регионов России
✅ найти но…
#гербициды
🥊 Высокий урожай закладывается с осени!
На российском рынке много гербицидов для осеннего внесения, однако большинство из них имеют важную особенность — они применяются после появления всходов культуры и сорных растений.
Пока аграрии ждут этого момента, наступает неустойчивая осенняя погода, и обработку часто приходится откладывать на весну.
🌾 Чтобы помочь хозяйствам избежать этих рисков, «Сингента» от…
#сингента
День поля подошел к концу! 🤝 Спасибо вам за участие, реакции и живой интерес.
Предлагаем заглянуть в нашу фотогалерею — ловите кадры со стенда и улыбки команды. 📸
До встречи на следующих мероприятиях «Сингенты»!
«Сингента» в MAX 📲
#сингента
#лаборатория
🕵️♂️ Разгадка!
В продолжение прошлого поста говорим правильный ответ — антракноз. Смотрите видео с подробностями!
«Сингента» в MAX 📲
#сингента
#лаборатория
🧫 Полевая лаборатория
На видео Маргарита Баукова, специалист исследовательской лаборатории «Сингенты», показывает стебель картофеля. Смотрите внимательно: на поверхности отчётливо видны мелкие чёрные округлые образования — склероции.
«Сингента» в MAX 📲
#сингента
#картофель
🥔 Прямо с поля: что делать в августе, чтобы не потерять урожай?
Поговорили со Светланой Спиглазовой, техническим экспертом по картофелю, о самом актуальном для картофелеводов.
На что нужно обратить внимание в августе?
💁♀️: В первую очередь, стоит обратить внимание на фитофтороз. Многие ослабляют контроль и начинают готовиться к уборке, но одна пропущенная обработка может свести на «нет» все у…
#сингента
#деньполя
☀️ В такой солнечный день «Сингента» встречает вас на Дне поля Московской области!
Прямо на площадке развернули нашу полевую лабораторию. 🔬
Покажем, как современная и своевременная диагностика помогает агроному принять решение о выборе защиты. Следите за новостями!
«Сингента» в MAX 📲
#агроподдержка
#подсолнечник
🌻 Агроподдержка «Сингенты» всегда на связи, даже если погода диктует свои условия!
Когда корзиночные гнили берут верх, важно действовать быстро. Смотрите карточки и узнайте рекомендации.
ЗаРеглонь правильно, чтобы сохранить урожай с помощью РЕГЛОН® Эйр!
Нужна консультация прямо сейчас? Мы всегда на связи!
📲 Телефон горячей линии:
• 8 (800) 200-82-82
💬 Вы можете писать нам:
• В MAX
• …
#кропвайс
#подкаствполе
🤝 Первый клиент: история доверия. Интервью с Дмитрием Цыганок, главным агрономом СХП имени П. П. Лукьяненко
✔️ Почему хозяйство решилось одним из первых использовать Cropwise®?
✔️ Что убедило команду попробовать новый подход и какие результаты принесли цифровые решения на практике?
Смотреть видео во ВКонтакте
Смотреть видео на YouTube
Дмитрий рассказывает о доверии к инновациям, о первых …
#сингента
#соя
🎥 Так проходят «Главные по сое»
Сотни профессионалов отрасли, десятки сортов сои, обсуждения технологий прямо в поле и живое общение между теми, кто ежедневно работает на результат.
В этом видео — атмосфера прошлогоднего мероприятия.
В этом году участников ждут:
🌱 88 сортов сои в демонстрации
🌱 Актуальные технологии защиты растений
🌱 Эксперты и представители ведущих семеноводческих организаций
🌱 Пр…
#кукуруза
🌽 Эректоидные листья кукурузы
В новом видео наш технический эксперт Евгений Сизоненко рассказывает, как строение листьев кукурузы влияет на возможность использования растением непродуктивной влаги для получения большего урожая.
«Сингента» в MAX 📲
❤3👍3🤝1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @syngentaru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 172,835 of 1,481,217entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сингента Россия” (@syngentaru), 6,040 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syngentaru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.