Channel
@syndromeofexstucf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
204subscribers
-3 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002105020413 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @syndromeofexstucf |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/syndromeofexstucf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:18 | 204 | -3 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 18:41 | 207 | no change |
| 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 | 207 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (9 April 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 68 |
| Reactions total | 13 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
87 reactions across 18 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 26.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 26.4% | |
| 👾 | 13 | 14.9% | |
| 💔 | 12 | 13.8% | |
| 💘 | 8 | 9.20% | |
| 😭 | 7 | 8.05% | |
| 😨 | 6 | 6.90% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 🤝 | 5 | 5.75% | |
| 👍 | 3 | 3.45% | |
| ❤🔥 | 2 | 2.30% | |
| 💋 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🕊 | 1 | 1.15% | |
| 🤬 | 1 | 1.15% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 87reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 April 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Ребя, я пришла просить совета Как вы концентрируетесь на учёбе? Чтобы прям сесть и неотрывно писать, а не смотреть в точку по полчаса. В этом году я планирую начать ходить в художку, добавить физической активности, + новые предметы, так что урезать прокрастинацию над домашкой придётся. Я очень надеюсь, что будут способы Неанон, полиолефин #тейк@syndromeofexstucf
❤1💋1🕊1
Signed number 1 angel
https://t.me/syndromeofexstucf/1778 забыла совсем скинуть. вообщем,я счастлива 🙏 #тейк@syndromeofexstucf [🎯] - к тейку не относится! ребятки,кф не мертв,я планирую сделать новое оформление и вернуть канал к работе,летом тейков мало,но думаю к началу учебного года все вернетсы на круги своя
🔥5❤3❤🔥2
Signed number 1 angel
Сукаа мы седня получили табели за год, я хочу убиться нахуй Все предметы 100, кроме ебанной теории вождения✌️✌️✌️✌️95 в полугодии 98 в году И блять я даже не думала что так будет, я была уверена что у меня 100 потому что ну блять всегда там что условно 60% один экзамен, 30% контрольные и 10% поведение на уроке, а эта мразь мне будто нахуй только экзамен учла и всё блять А самое обидное что мне не с кем поделиться в ж…
❤2
Signed lait
Словить гиперфикс на персонажа и из-за него на некоторое время забросить учёбу это норм или стрём? #тейк@syndromeofexstucf
❤3
Signed lait
я уже не вывожу. у меня через +- месяц вступительный экзамен, я буду поступать на дизайнера. готовиться я начала где-то 3 месяца назад, я была вообще полным нулем, а сейчас у меня уже есть неплохой базовый уровень. но все равно, я пиздец переживаю, что не поступлю на бюджет. при чем в идеале я хочу не просто поступить на бюджет, а быть в топ 5 лучших, но при этом мне ОЧЕНЬ лень готовиться, хотя скорее не лень, а у ме…
❤4
Signed lait
Я посчитала что 6÷2(1+3) = 1.... (Вместо 9) Это какая стадия дибилизма? #тейк@syndromeofexstucf [🎯] - 12 же выходит вроде
👍3
Signed lait
сколько часов на каникулах можно учиться максимально, чтобы не выгореть? #тейк@syndromeofexstucf [🎯] - для каждого по разному,оптимально 2-3 часа в день
❤4
Signed lait
по математике 21 балл я два года училась в физмате(сейчас химбио) и решала контрольные за половину мои одноклассников которые получили пять мне рано резаться и уходить в монастырь или еще можно дождаться других резов #тейк@syndromeofexstucf
Signed lait
https://t.me/syndromeofexstucf/1796 всем привет, это снова я я втрихуи, пришли результаты, мне не хватило 1 балла до пятерки я не знаю, каким вообще чудом это случилось.. Или метод "помолиться на икону Ященко" реально работает?? Неанон швед в сливках #тейк@syndromeofexstucf
❤3
Signed lait
меня заебала историчка. Сука, по истории балл 4.50. Итоговую кр написал на 5, а эта шлюха въебала опять четверку в четверть.я уже не вывожу #тейк@syndromeofexstucf
💔8😭3🤬1
Signed lait
всем привет. математика убивала меня с 4 класса. в аттестат идет среднее арифметическое за ВИС, геометрию, алгебру и ОГЭ. по первым трем у меня 5/5/4, а вот ОГЭ я с огромным шансом написала на 3, потому что, хоть задания и показались лёгкими, сверив ответы, я осознала, что проебала 4 задания из второй части и 5 заданий из первой точно (а остальные не помню, точно правильно решила только 8 заданий). Плакал мой красный…
💔2😭1
Signed lait
ребяя, подскажите пж. я перехожу в 7 класс, хочу поступить в физмат и начинаю прорешивать алгебру, геометрию, физику, также олимпиадные задания. я даже учебники купила!!! за день норм 4 часа заниматься? мне просто кажется это очень мало(( по геометрии в день в среднем 7 страниц, по алгебере тоже, по физике 3, олимпиадных стр 5, нормалды??? #тейк@syndromeofexstucf [🎯] - кто ты воин
Signed lait
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @syndromeofexstucf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 1,179,398 of 1,550,220entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“синдром отличника confession” (@syndromeofexstucf), 204 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syndromeofexstucf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.