Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Syndicate Investments

Channel

Syndicate Investments

@syndicate_investments

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,670subscribers

-413 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001197384571
TypeChannel
Username@syndicate_investments
DescriptionКанал ведет Зокир Ибрагимов, Аккредитованный Аудитор и Советник Исламских Финансов - AAOIFI. Сайт: https://cryptosyndicate.club/ Поддержка @Cryptosyndicate_Support_Bot
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held26
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/syndicate_investments

Topic

Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,6708,0837,876.57 August 2026 — 8,083 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,078 subscribers10 August 2026 — 8,060 subscribers13 August 2026 — 8,034 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,017 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,006 subscribers23 August 2026 — 7,996 subscribers26 August 2026 — 7,988 subscribers29 August 2026 — 7,985 subscribers1 September 2026 — 7,972 subscribers4 September 2026 — 7,960 subscribers10 September 2026 — 7,929 subscribers13 September 2026 — 7,909 subscribers18 September 2026 — 7,891 subscribers27 September 2026 — 7,850 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,819 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,765 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,754 subscribers17 October 2026 — 7,744 subscribers20 October 2026 — 7,735 subscribers23 October 2026 — 7,720 subscribers26 October 2026 — 7,705 subscribers29 October 2026 — 7,702 subscribers2 November 2026 — 7,693 subscribers4 November 2026 — 7,684 subscribers7 November 2026 — 7,670 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
26 measurements spanning 92 days, net -413. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,608–8,145 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 26
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 11:457,670-14
4 Nov 2026, 14:497,684-9
2 Nov 2026, 00:357,693-9
29 Oct 2026, 20:087,702-3
26 Oct 2026, 22:277,705-15
23 Oct 2026, 17:167,720-15
20 Oct 2026, 19:087,735-9
17 Oct 2026, 22:477,744-10
15 Oct 2026, 02:107,754-11
12 Oct 2026, 04:387,765-54
5 Oct 2026, 11:017,819-31
27 Sept 2026, 07:187,850-41
18 Sept 2026, 09:567,891-18
13 Sept 2026, 17:027,909-20
10 Sept 2026, 03:557,929-31
4 Sept 2026, 20:387,960-12
1 Sept 2026, 13:257,972-13
29 Aug 2026, 20:187,985-3
26 Aug 2026, 14:347,988-8
23 Aug 2026, 10:157,996first reading

Engagement

55 posts held, back to 3 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
10.7%
avg views ÷ 7,670 subscribers
Avg views / post
820
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.919%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 55 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 17 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 November 2026
Posts held55 (3 July 2026 – 7 November 2026)
Views total16,406
Reactions total135
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 01:20 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,670
Videos
≈100
Links
≈1,980

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

331 reactions across 45 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍12537.8%
🔥6619.9%
❤5215.7%
😁288.46%
👏267.85%
custom 5283215317777014563154.53%
🐳92.72%
🤔41.21%
❤‍🔥20.604%
💯10.302%
🤣10.302%
🤬10.302%
🤯10.302%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 47 of the 55 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 331 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 55 most recent posts we hold, published 3 July 2026 to 7 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 55 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @syndicate_investments. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 55 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 July 2026 to 7 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 8 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (40.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

7 Nov 2026, 11:49 UTC274 views6 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Мы получили сообщения о несанкционированных транзакциях в некоторых аккаунтах Keplr, созданных с помощью входа через Google или Apple. Мы сообщили об этой проблеме команде Web3Auth и с тех пор совместно с ними проводим расследование. По результатам предварительной проверки: Если вы создали свой кошелёк Keplr с помощью мнемонической фразы восстановления (Seed Phrase) или аппаратного кошелька, вы НЕ затронуты этой пр…

👍5💯1

6 Nov 2026, 09:30 UTC438 views7 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Почти один триллион долларов ($1 000 000 000 000) был стерт с азиатского фондового рынка сегодня. А крипта остается устойчивой на этом фоне. Это хороший бычий сигнал.

🔥7

5 Nov 2026, 06:31 UTC506 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Вот те раз. Демократы забирают обе палаты Конгресса, а среди победителей промежуточных выборов уже 245 кандидатов, которых Stand With Crypto считает сторонниками крипты. Из них 226 прошли в Палату представителей и 19 — в Сенат. Подсчёт ещё идёт. https://www.standwithcrypto.org/races

4 Nov 2026, 09:46 UTC568 views16 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ты был избранником! 😂

😁15🔥1

4 Nov 2026, 08:48 UTC541 viewsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Люди уже делают анализ компаний с помощью AI аналитика на платформе Syndicate. На скрине вывод по одной из компаний, которую анализировали наши пользователи. Прямо доходчивый вывод и анализ. Очень четкий и понятный ответ. Это очень классный инструмент. Прямо рекомендасьон. https://syndicate-investments.com/account/finreview

4 Nov 2026, 04:58 UTC497 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

По прогнозу CBS, который приводит BBC, республиканцы теряют и Палату представителей, и Сенат. Поразительно, как можно получить Белый дом и обе палаты Конгресса — и настолько бездарно растерять это преимущество. Столько обещаний, и почти всё, на мой взгляд, оказалось ложью. Обещали мир — получили новые войны. Обещали вывести криптоиндустрию на новый уровень — вместо этого сплошное вытягивание денег из рынка, воровст…

👍10

3 Nov 2026, 09:20 UTC≈1,210 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

🔍 Покупаете акции компании? Узнайте, что стоит за её цифрами. Мы запустили в Syndicate AI Аналитик. Это специализированный инструмент для глубокого исследования финансовых документов, а не обычный чат с нейросетью. Вы выбираете компанию по тикеру. AI изучает её годовую и квартальную отчётность, корпоративные раскрытия и комментарии руководства, сопоставляет информацию и собирает подробный разбор на русском языке. …

❤3

31 Oct 2026, 05:24 UTC677 views10 reactionsread 8 November 2026

Интересно, что весь мир практически убедили в том, что за всеми кибер взломами в мире стоят северокорейцы, хотя на самом деле это больше похоже на дело рук какого-нибудь Моссада, или ЦРУ.

👍8❤1🤬1

30 Oct 2026, 11:56 UTC761 views3 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Ситуация развивается интересно. Илон Маск затроллил CZ в Твиттере на фоне взлома Binance. CZ шутку не оценил: мол, Илон, при всём уважении, сейчас совсем не время для троллинга. Заодно напомнил, что Binance вложила $500 млн в покупку Twitter, а связанные с этой инвестицией акции SpaceX сейчас стоят больше миллиарда долларов. И попросил Маска проявить немного поддержки. А следом опубликовал вот такой пост: «Прибли…

🔥2❤1

30 Oct 2026, 09:16 UTC667 viewsread 8 November 2026

Кукоин тоже ушел из РФ. Источник.

30 Oct 2026, 02:17 UTC≈1,450 views4 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

❗️Взлом Binance: подробности атаки По предварительной оценке исследователя drk, с кошельков биржи вывели около $5,8 млрд в семи блокчейнах. Binance сообщила о заморозке примерно $3 млрд и обещала покрыть потери от взлома. Вывод средств временно приостановлен. Как это произошло Согласно техническому разбору, злоумышленник заранее тестировал атаку на собственных кошельках. Затем использовал 50 цифровых разрешений, п…

❤3🤯1

27 Oct 2026, 05:25 UTC793 views9 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Рынок притих. Все ждут: • 28 октября — решение ФРС по ставке. • 29 октября — ВВП США за III квартал, инфляция PCE и решение ЕЦБ. • 30 октября — решение Банка Японии. • 3 ноября — выборы в Конгресс США. Подсчёт может занять больше одной ночи. • 6 ноября — занятость и безработица в США. На мой взгляд, альткоины уже оттолкнулись от локального дна, и бычья структура сохраняется. Но дорога вверх редко бывает прямой: ко…

👍5❤1👏1🤔1custom 52832153177770145631

Showing the 12 most recent of 55 posts we hold for @syndicate_investments. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Quan2um Labs | RU
@q2_ru · 21,551
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 20 September 2026
Мансур Идеи Инвестора
@mansurinvestoridea · 27,464
Telegram ranks this channel #19 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 9 September 2026
Халяльный миллион с Кумаром Мухаметзяновым
@halalinvests · 19,681
Telegram ranks this channel #30 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 4 October 2026
Mansur University
@mansur_university_halal_kurs · 18,271
Telegram ranks this channel #35 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 5 October 2026
Триллионер
@trillioner · 24,650
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 15 September 2026
Мансур | Исламские Финансы Инвестиции
@mansurfinance1 · 33,653
Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 6 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Syndicate Investments” (@syndicate_investments), 7,670 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/syndicate_investments.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.