Channel
@sydneycriminallawyers
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
1,829subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001565335110 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sydneycriminallawyers |
| Created | 6 August 2021 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 19 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 19 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sydneycriminallawyers |
National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 19 Sept 2026, 17:36 | 1,829 | +4 |
| 15 Sept 2026, 03:42 | 1,825 | +8 |
| 11 Sept 2026, 05:37 | 1,817 | -3 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 15:13 | 1,820 | -2 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 1,822 | -1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 15:48 | 1,823 | -2 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 1,825 | +1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 11:56 | 1,824 | -6 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 05:53 | 1,830 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:24 | 1,831 | -2 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 11:32 | 1,833 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:53 | 1,833 | first reading |
21 posts held, back to 30 January 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 21 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Officers are now required to activate body worn cameras when exercising their law enforcement powers. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/use-of-body-worn-video-cameras-is-now-mandatory-for-nsw-police-officers/
The NSW government is introducing laws that would give police officers the broad power to compel individuals to surrender and facilitate access to their digital devices. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/nsw-police-to-be-given-powers-to-access-and-download-phone-content-on-the-beat/
The claim by authorities that expanding surveillance powers is necessary to protect children is the latest dubious justification for further eroding civil liberties https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/the-thought-police-are-using-the-protection-of-kids-to-justify-the-expansion-of-surveillance/
An independent review of the NSW Police Force has made abundantly clear the organisation is rife with bullying and discrimination from the top down. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/nsw-police-culture-is-rife-with-bullying-and-discrimination-often-inflicted-by-leaders/
An outcry has erupted over an incident whereby police shoved an elderly bicyclist to the ground before bashing a younger man who tried to intervene. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/police-thuggery-is-the-new-blue-in-ever-creeping-authoritarian-australia/
The police commissioner announced that charges brought under the unconstitutional blanket ban on protests will be withdrawn, but many are asking, ‘where’s the apology?’ https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/nsw-police-are-withdrawing-criminal-charges-brought-under-unconstitutional-protest-ban/
The ban was found to impinge upon the implied right of political communication contained in the Australian Constitution. https://nswcourts.com.au/articles/nsw-governments-blanket-ban-on-protest-marches-is-unconstitutional-court-finds/
Australian politicians will receive greater security protections in response to a reported increase in the threat of politically motivated crime. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/protections-for-politicians-enhanced-due-to-rise-in-politically-motivated-violence/
The new law only applies to Palestinians and “Israeli Arabs”. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/israel-prescribes-death-by-hanging-for-palestinians-convicted-of-terrorism-related-murder/
The National Press Club cancelled an address by a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist who is critical of Israel, before enabling the Israeli ambassador to broadcast lies. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/the-rot-setting-in-at-the-national-press-club-is-spreading-to-other-australian-institutions/
The continued refusal of the NSW government to condemn the multiple acts of clear police brutality against protesters suggests our leaders tacitly support it. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/the-ongoing-affirmation-of-the-police-brutalisation-of-herzog-protesters-speaks-volumes/
The criminalisation of political slogans exemplifies our nation’s steep descent into authoritarianism. https://www.sydneycriminallawyers.com.au/blog/banning-political-slogans-the-absurd-new-way-to-stamp-out-pro-palestinian-support/
Showing the 12 most recent of 21 posts we hold for @sydneycriminallawyers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SYDNEY CRIMINAL LAWYERS” (@sydneycriminallawyers), 1,829 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sydneycriminallawyers.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.