Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 沈阳出击队车评报告

Channel

沈阳出击队车评报告

@sycj22

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

7,004subscribers

+4,237 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001858983283
TypeChannel
Username@sycj22
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live25 August 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 25 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sycj22

Growth

2,7677,0044,885.59 August 2026 — 2,767 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,767 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,809 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,940 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,890 subscribers19 August 2026 — 4,932 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,099 subscribers25 August 2026 — 7,004 subscribers9 August 202625 August 2026
8 measurements spanning 16 days, net +4,237. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,131–7,640 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
25 Aug 2026, 23:537,004+905
23 Aug 2026, 04:186,099+1,167
19 Aug 2026, 19:144,932+1,042
16 Aug 2026, 19:253,890+950
13 Aug 2026, 12:152,940+131
10 Aug 2026, 17:372,809+42
9 Aug 2026, 19:002,767no change
9 Aug 2026, 18:522,767first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.62%
avg views ÷ 7,004 subscribers
Avg views / post
114
20 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.671%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
20
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 20 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 August 2026
Posts held20 (7 August 20269 August 2026)
Views total2,275
Reactions total1
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken9 Aug 2026, 19:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 16:33 UTC37 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-10 【评价人】: 匿名 【评价老师】: 莎莎 【人照评分】: 9.0 【颜值评分】: 8.0 【身材评分】: 9.0 【服务评分】: 8.0 【态度评分】: 9.0 【环境评分】: 9.0 【描述过程】: 服务不错,人很健谈,聊天很开心,态度很好,会二刷

9 Aug 2026, 15:59 UTC43 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: momo 【评价老师】: 小水 【人照评分】: 10.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 约了三次终于见到了小水,少见的真人比照片好看。服务态度真的很棒,进屋就帮你脱鞋袜领去洗刷刷,真的就是幼师照顾宝宝一样,全程互动伴聊一点都不尴尬,技术还好。

9 Aug 2026, 15:43 UTC52 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: Brandy Fox 【评价老师】: 洋洋, 洋 【人照评分】: 10.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 很润,服务态度很好,活好,非常满意,值得推荐

9 Aug 2026, 14:31 UTC77 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: 匿名 【评价老师】: 九月 【人照评分】: 10.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 九月老师是我遇到的非常非常好的一个姐姐,无论是长相还是身材都很打分,胸特别大还特别的挺,手感贼好,身材也是凹凸有致。服务特别的好,全套服务项目很齐全,口活非常的棒,绝对是行业标杆,天花板级别!这价格性价比直接拉满了,值得拥有👍

9 Aug 2026, 13:49 UTC75 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: 梅大爷 【评价老师】: kk 【人照评分】: 9.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 三刷无需多说,大胸不用多说去过一些谎报大胸的才知道kk老师这大胸的真实。拍露脸小视频和穿高跟鞋,还有🐍依旧配合。前几天因老约不到kk,我去出击其他人立刻就感觉到差距。这次总算把之前不愉快的体验抹去了。专业不专业,配合不配合,差距立显。还有一些是看人下菜碟,你给她点尊重她就蹬鼻子上脸。kk老师完全不会,会给你足够的温柔和尊重。

9 Aug 2026, 13:21 UTC77 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: 猫さきこ 【评价老师】: 洋洋, 洋 【人照评分】: 10.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 老师口活很好,本人长的和照片一样美,我本人是个处男,老师顾虑着我全程没需要我动

9 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC83 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: 匿名 【评价老师】: 洋洋, 洋 【人照评分】: 10.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 夯爆了就是好啊,水多敏感

9 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC84 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: 范特西 【评价老师】: 妮妮 【人照评分】: 10.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 妹妹穿个小吊带,两个大白兔若隐若现,漏出来一半,很是诱惑。闲聊过后 简单冲个澡上床。口活很厉害,差一点就被秒,挺不住了赶紧带伞进入正题,先来个女上,妹妹骑马功夫了得,又很会夹,骚逼真紧啊 实在挺不住了 翻身把妹妹压在身下快速抽插,很快就交货了。虽然没有什么花里胡哨的项目,但是有点女朋友的感觉很舒服,颜值身材都不错,体验很好,值得推荐一下。

9 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC78 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: Glenn Reece 【评价老师】: 洋洋, 洋 【人照评分】: 10.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 年龄小真实可爱推荐

9 Aug 2026, 11:58 UTC205 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: qaz 【评价老师】: 水水 【人照评分】: 10.0 【颜值评分】: 10.0 【身材评分】: 10.0 【服务评分】: 10.0 【态度评分】: 10.0 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: 非常棒 秒了我……漂亮逼紧 绝绝子 女神!!!

9 Aug 2026, 02:19 UTC137 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: T Om 【评价老师】: 小橘子 【人照评分】: 8.0 【颜值评分】: 8.0 【身材评分】: 8.5 【服务评分】: 9.5 【态度评分】: 8.5 【环境评分】: 10.0 【描述过程】: Cj老师不清楚,跟着TOm不迷路 趁着早上硬邦邦,把近期出击的老师评论都写下,给各位狼友做下参考意见。 依旧结论先行,整体给到9分,从周边城市来的老师,短开几天。喜欢服务好🐍👄的狼友可抓紧出击。 老师舌头非常灵活,非常舒服,爱爱姿势非常多,主动且花样全面。趁着短开可放心cj。

9 Aug 2026, 02:18 UTC120 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

【所属群组】: 沈阳修车出击队👉@sycj1 【评价时间】: 2026-08-09 【评价人】: T Om 【评价老师】: 宝宝 【人照评分】: 8.0 【颜值评分】: 8.0 【身材评分】: 9.0 【服务评分】: 8.0 【态度评分】: 8.5 【环境评分】: 8.5 【描述过程】: Cj老师不清楚,跟着TOm不迷路 趁着早上硬邦邦,把近期出击的老师评论都写下,给各位狼友做下参考意见。 结论先行,喜欢服务和身材的可以放心cj,活不糊弄,口的很舒服,身材也不错,胸型很好看,情绪价值提供的也很高,南方老师不会长待。 整体打分9分,性比价比较高的老师,

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sycj22. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 656,125 of 1,621,120entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 25 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“沈阳出击队车评报告” (@sycj22), 7,004 subscribers as measured 25 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sycj22.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.