Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Сицебрекс!

@sycebrex

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,166subscribers

-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002096938754
TypeChannel
Username@sycebrex
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live13 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 13 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/sycebrex

Growth

1,1661,1691,167.56 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers7 August 2026 — 1,169 subscribers10 August 2026 — 1,167 subscribers13 August 2026 — 1,166 subscribers6 August 202613 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,166–1,169 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
13 Aug 2026, 11:271,166-1
10 Aug 2026, 04:221,167-2
7 Aug 2026, 02:271,169+1
6 Aug 2026, 12:021,168first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 20 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

180 reactions across 15 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7843.3%
😁5530.6%
2312.8%
👍105.56%
🤔84.44%
👎21.11%
👏21.11%
😐21.11%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 180reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 20 March 2026 to 22 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 15 we hold a reading for · 7%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @sycebrex. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 15 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 20 March 2026 to 22 May 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

22 May 2026, 13:43 UTC515 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Контекст и окружение Очевидничать нет смысла - всегда все дело в контексте и вашем окружении. Что в повседневной жизни, что в безумных применениях ИИ и всех технологий вокруг ИИ Один мой близкий друг поставил несколько крутых экспериментов. Он использует ИИ для всякого рода рабочих, в хорошем смысле хулиганских задач. Будучи классным пентестером и исследователем он задумал тут делегировать всякие рутинные штуки ИИ.

🔥61👏1

5 May 2026, 07:27 UTC687 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Пока в Москве абсолютный мобильный блекаут, вспомнилась тут одна непопулярная, но потенциально очень актуальная технология передачи данных - IPoAC (IP over Avian Carriers). Или, проще говоря, IP посредством почтовых голубей. То есть беспроводной интернет, но с огромной задержкой. Но интернет! В 2001 году протестировали практическое применение этой технологии - отправили ping запрос. 9 сетевых пакетов, 9 голубей, 1 э

😁11

30 Apr 2026, 09:02 UTC700 views9 reactionsread 6 August 2026

...читаю я в ТГ пост написанный в ТГ! прекрасно и восхитительно

😁9

29 Apr 2026, 14:07 UTC902 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Много, очень много новостей касательно зарубежного трафика. И смешных и еще более забаных Такое понятие, как платный зарубежный трафик - что-то явно новое для рунета и российского бизнеса. Пока вопросов больше, чем ответов- не понятно как маркировать локальный и зарубежный трафик, какие мощности нужны, будет ли белый список для бизнеса, которому разрешен безлимит, как платить за домашнее обновление ОС, CDN сети и ба

🔥112👍2👎1

27 Apr 2026, 12:18 UTC651 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

А если о серьезном, то тут на позапрошлой неделе компания Палантир (крупный подрядчик министерства войны сша, выпускник акселератора стартапов ЦРУ и просто интересная компания) выдал антиутопическую базу. Если вы думаете, что в рунете и около творится треш, угар и содомия, то нет. Везде полыхает дичь Palantir в официальном и не менее запрещенном на территории РФ аккаунте X (бывший Твиттер), запостили отрывки из кни

🔥5👍2🤔1

27 Apr 2026, 11:06 UTC521 views12 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Сегодня на мероприятии по обучению кибербезу и кибер-грамотности: «Киберкультура 2026». Тут доклады разных компаний про то, какие трюки и фишки они поменяют у себя, чтобы не пробили периметр и не взломали Коллеги из Билайна рассказали про викторину у себя. А люди там с юмором 🫠 либо уже утомились от всех этих обучений

😁9👍1👏1🔥1

22 Apr 2026, 16:54 UTC861 views10 reactions2 Starsread 6 August 2026

Бонжур, мои дорогие! давно меня не было в уличных гонках канале Как вы думаете, сложно ли следить за военным фригатом, стоимостью 500 миллионов евро? Оказалось, что совсем нет! Королевский фрегат Нидерландов Zr.Ms. Evertsen сейчас в стратегической миссии. Но это не помешало любопытному журналисту совершить пранк, который чуть не вышел из-под контроля. Журналист отправил трекер стоимостью 5 евро через почтовую службу

🔥10

8 Apr 2026, 14:27 UTC897 views11 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Хммм… кажется, что нужно сделать платный тренинг для сотрудников Роскосмоса о том, как нужно пользоваться ИИ. А затраты на этот тренинг предложить вычесть зарплаты их штатного дизайнера или того, кто согласует плакаты

😁8🔥21

4 Apr 2026, 09:35 UTC991 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Полное оправдание подорожания оперативки и безумства вокруг ИИ, дубль 2 Вы посмотрите какое великолепие рождается и что еще нас ждёт. В том числе и в мире кибербеза. Несмотря на тот бред, что происходит сейчас

🔥114😐1

2 Apr 2026, 06:27 UTC≈1,030 views21 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

В общем, подорожание оперативки и вся суета вокруг ИИ - оправданы Такого Буратино от Гая Ричи посмотрели бы все

🔥155👎1

31 Mar 2026, 13:23 UTC850 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ищем где же всё-таки эксплойт под телеграмм продается. В Амстердаме пока нет. Продолжаем наблюдение 👀

😁128👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sycebrex. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 1,145,441 of 1,336,469entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Сицебрекс!” (@sycebrex), 1,166 subscribers as measured 13 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sycebrex.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.