Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ⋮ ⌗ ┆𝕤𝕨𝒆𝒓𝒍𝒂 ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁

Channel

⋮ ⌗ ┆𝕤𝕨𝒆𝒓𝒍𝒂 ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁

@swswerw

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

87subscribers

-6 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003856134847
TypeChannel
Username@swswerw
CreatedBetween 1 February 2026 and 18 February 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/swswerw

Growth

8793908 August 2026 — 93 subscribers9 August 2026 — 93 subscribers16 August 2026 — 89 subscribers31 August 2026 — 87 subscribers8 August 202631 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 23 days, net -6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 86–94 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Aug 2026, 03:1387-2
16 Aug 2026, 20:4789-4
9 Aug 2026, 13:3193no change
8 Aug 2026, 09:3593first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 18 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

139 reactions across 7 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 54719260704102495243021.6%
custom 52720118010961309082417.3%
custom 54566651668443035512014.4%
custom 58146653282144169901611.5%
custom 5456577382007741149107.19%
custom 5458729070428722157107.19%
custom 506463966037488639885.76%
custom 542053542950394138575.04%
custom 524499509529965897053.60%
custom 527152448981176363821.44%
custom 537521410566786739821.44%
custom 539359400589424305121.44%
custom 523573547222699559910.719%
custom 543618892314551238410.719%
custom 545854050847952483510.719%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 139reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 18 February 2026 to 10 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

4 May 2026, 06:25 UTC117 viewsread 9 August 2026

ухожу отсюда навсегда, подписывайтесь на лайф кому нужен https://t.me/+3dDP4fOLb8EwNDVi

13 Apr 2026, 05:37 UTC109 viewsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 scenes w Pasha & Dasha when you use the material, please write "+" in the comments! ✨@swswerw | boost

13 Apr 2026, 03:09 UTC92 views6 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 emoji w Will Byers when you use the material, please write "+" in the comments! ✨@swswerw | boost

custom 52449950952996589703custom 52715244898117636381custom 53752141056678673981custom 54361889231455123841

12 Apr 2026, 20:52 UTC90 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 scenes w Millie & Noah when you use the material, please write "+" in the comments! ✨@swswerw | boost

custom 52449950952996589701custom 52715244898117636381custom 53935940058942430511

12 Apr 2026, 20:17 UTC67 views5 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

🤩🤩 stickers w Nancy Wheeler when you use the material, please write "+" in the comments! ✨@swswerw | boost

custom 52357354722269955991custom 52449950952996589701custom 53752141056678673981custom 53935940058942430511custom 54585405084795248351

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @swswerw. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 573,805 of 1,628,524entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“⋮ ⌗ ┆𝕤𝕨𝒆𝒓𝒍𝒂 ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁” (@swswerw), 87 subscribers as measured 31 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swswerw.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.