Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for swoosh crypto

Channel

swoosh crypto

@swooshcryptoo

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,492subscribers

-10 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002054333631
TypeChannel
Username@swooshcryptoo
CreatedBetween 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 August 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/swooshcryptoo

Growth

2,4922,5032,497.57 August 2026 — 2,502 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,502 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,503 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,499 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,497 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,492 subscribers7 August 202616 August 2026
6 measurements spanning 9 days, net -10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,490–2,505 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Aug 2026, 18:342,492-5
13 Aug 2026, 13:172,497-2
10 Aug 2026, 11:162,499-4
7 Aug 2026, 16:582,503+1
7 Aug 2026, 12:012,502no change
7 Aug 2026, 11:532,502first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 1 January 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
28.4%
avg views ÷ 2,492 subscribers
Avg views / post
707
1 post measured
Reaction rate
1.13%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
1
of 20 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 August 2026
Posts held20 (1 January 20264 August 2026)
Views total707
Reactions total8
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 18:04 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

Reaction mix

198 reactions across 20 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥8140.9%
5226.3%
🐳4723.7%
🎄42.02%
😍42.02%
😨31.52%
🙏21.01%
🤔21.01%
🕊10.505%
🤨10.505%
🥰10.505%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 198reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 January 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 20 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @swooshcryptoo. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 January 2026 to 4 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

4 Aug 2026, 15:42 UTC707 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Х (твиттер) 🥕🥕 Как же много сейчас этого в инфополе, знаю очень много криптанов которые перешли в эту нишу. (супериор 600$ приватка🤩) НУ и самому так же захотелось попробовать, уже есть знакомый который шарит в этой теме, поэтому залетел к нему же в приватку, пообещал мне что за 3 месяца получу уже монетку, посты уже летят🤪 Инфа оч полезная + поддержка 24/7 + софты и много другого 👍 цена кстати по сравнению с други

🔥4🤔1🤨1😨1🙏1

6 May 2026, 15:35 UTC≈1,210 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

рынок радует. наконец таки 🥕🥕 Мы дождались момента когда все стало лучше, чем последние как будто месяцев 6-8, ожил bybit, были норм промки, сам не влетал смотрел что по проходке, вроде неплохо, так же как порадовал дуров, ожил TON, а это самый легкий блокчейн для заработка в принципе, тут были разные тапалки, подарки и тд 🤔 А так сама идея сделать тон снова великим прикольная, разные щитки на тоне полетели, та и с

🔥6🐳43

27 Apr 2026, 23:37 UTC≈1,160 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

итак, чуть я опоздал, но как есть УБТ пробуем заходить в нишу, крипта пока стоит, а мы стоять на месте не хотим 💩 ВСЕ кто заинтересован в работе welcome @nazarss Есть оч хорошие офферы, по оплате прям вкусно, начинаем работать уже на днях, не затягивайте Если вы не разбираетесь, не проблема, всему обучим, особенно лоубанкам актуально ——— Так же если есть какие то идеи, партнерства мб, так же пишите, все обсуди

🐳2🔥21🙏1

26 Apr 2026, 20:21 UTC≈1,170 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Дуров добавил стену в тг 🥕🥕 https://t.me/wall что за лега пашок, любим, ценим, уважаем Завтра ждите интересный пост в канал, будем делать что то интересное 😎

3🔥3🐳2🎄1

9 Apr 2026, 19:29 UTC≈1,160 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

+1 TON фри На ферму прогнать, и на пиццу будет https://okx.ac/crypto-gifts/SN7TBEA7?route_biz=gift&channelId=DICTATOR

🔥4🐳32

2 Apr 2026, 14:18 UTC≈1,310 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Регаемся на плейтест от Sandbox 🤓 Когда увидел новость, вспомнил про 4 сезон, аж глаза намокли чето. А пока воркаем что есть 😔 Они обещают реварды, но я бы на них не рассчитывал вообще, а так просто посмотрим на саму игру и где там можно будет заработать https://www.sandbox.game/next/en Из интересного так же есть пул 10к $SAND для топ 10 рефералов, там софт изи пишеться на БАСе, попробуйте, будет копейка какая то

🔥6🐳43

30 Mar 2026, 19:06 UTC≈1,230 views13 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Фришные 10$ (вроде как) Битгет запустили промку, дают по 33 токена, прайс указан 0.3, даже если ждать по 0.1 выходит не плохо, акк делаеться за 5 минут ТУТ чекайте, фкфс пробуйте, капча может лагать, индусы уже знают

🔥53🐳3🕊1🥰1

24 Mar 2026, 17:37 UTC≈1,170 views10 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

По этому 🥕🥕 Выглядит все не так смартово как могло бы быть, но все же, вам должны были уже отправить НФТ смотрите в дебанке, потом переходите на сайт с игрой -Коннектите кош, регаетесь, и с эпик геймса качаем игру Потом именно нам открыт ивент от СМС на 20к бачей, сам пока играть не пробовал, но смущает то что еще 106 дней, но вроде реварды пишуться сразу, и сама игра норм, так что тыкаем, играем, лутаем профит 🤩

🔥53🐳2

20 Mar 2026, 14:12 UTC≈1,010 views14 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

фаст фаст 😜 Забираем пропуск от CMC в игру, и какую то или нфт или дроп в 20к$ фастом, осталось 5к мест(всего было 10) Нужно 100 камней ТУТ Знаю есть люди с фермами СМС и CoinGecko, лутайте 🌟

6🔥4😍3🐳1

17 Mar 2026, 13:08 UTC≈1,100 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ставки Polymarket ⬇️если футбол не интересен, не читайте Тут так как я главный фанат футбола, то решил с вами поделиться ставочками, рефки нету, просто мысли 😂😂 Real madrid x Man City 🇪🇸 Я взял Реал, прошлый перфоманс Феде Вальверде был очень сильным(у меня ставочка сыграла тогда) Тут я допускаю победу ман сити, но не проход в 1/4. ЛЧ аура Реала не позволит просто. Поэтому тут брал не на сильно много Liverpool x

🔥4🐳31

15 Mar 2026, 19:07 UTC≈1,080 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Нужно адаптироваться Это сейчас главные слова для меня, так как я понял, что ждать того что было раньше(фри денег с дропов и тд.) не стоит. 😭 Нужно адаптироваться под тот рынок, который есть сейчас, я долго не хотел лезть во фьючи, но походу прийдеться. Сейчас помимо всяких нда😎 темок (мизерных, но все же) фокус переключаю на полимаркет и на ЖБ🤫 фьючи, влетать в лудку я не очень собираюсь, но как выйдет Так же ка

🔥42🐳2

19 Feb 2026, 16:58 UTC≈1,260 views7 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Back to the game 😜 Был такой перерывчик, довольно таки долгий, к сожалению медвежка никого не жалко, а на самом то деле, те кто говорят что возможностей куча ребят, арбитражки и тд. то как по мне не правы, я знаю куча примеров кто терял на данных арбитражах, справедливой цене и так далее. А таких "темок" как раньше, намного меньше, намного Поэтому и выходит, что в лудку на фьючах я лезть не хочу, а что мне остаетьс

🔥42😍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @swooshcryptoo. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 815,631 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“swoosh crypto” (@swooshcryptoo), 2,492 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swooshcryptoo.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.