Кто купит этот канал? Можете тут дрейнер кидать похуй цена 5тысяч долларов.
😁20😨1

Channel
@switchtalking
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,738subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001691712166 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @switchtalking |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 31 March 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 10 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/switchtalking |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 10 Aug 2026, 19:17 | 1,738 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 02:41 | 1,739 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:31 | 1,740 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 05:18 | 1,740 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 December 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 20 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
96 reactions across 13 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 82.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 79 | 82.3% | |
| ❤ | 14 | 14.6% | |
| 😨 | 3 | 3.13% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 96reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 December 2025 to 20 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Кто купит этот канал? Можете тут дрейнер кидать похуй цена 5тысяч долларов.
😁20😨1
привет друзья последние полгода если не больше я занимаюсь полимаркетом каждый день и тк там появилась реферальная ссылка и я не видел ни 1 нормального канала по полимаркету то я решил снизойти с небес к вам и создал канал по полимаркету подписывайтесь пожалуйста всем спасибо https://t.me/switchpoly
😁4
Video, posted without a caption
❤2😁2😨1
К СЛОВУ! мы с моими лучшими друзьями с данного приватного сообщества - https://t.me/send?start=s-switch провели небольшие расчеты и у нас получилось то что находится на картинке берем выход хуже некуда по 500 лямов, цена поинта 0.167$, поинты фармятся бесплатно. поинтов фармится много. больше напоминаний не будет, кто не фармит предикт умрет в нищете https://predict.fun?ref=477B8
❤6
добрый вечер фанаты волюм растет без остановки, опинион готовится к выходу. поинтов опиниона ни у кого нет и их уже скупают по 65$+, нафармить не получится, если купить профит будет копеешный. выход опиниона: гои на фомо бегут фармить предиктфан, потому что больше нет предикшен маркетов которые можно пофармить. калши - сложно. полимаркет - нихуя не получите. предиктфан - дохуя китайцы угабуга дингалинг цз много д…
СВЫТЧ х ТРАВА друзья все мы сейчас фармим некст миллиарды (PREDICT.FUN - шилл от цз, дингалинг фаундер и тотальная ебка) и как вы понимаете с биг сайзами руками немножечко заебно поэтому мой травяной нутельный брад оформил ахуенный софт в команде с другим земляным крутым братаном, который кстати делал ВСЕМИРНО известный метеора фармер (уровень сами понимаете) так вот в чем суть мы объединились и мне дали софт и пр…
😁10❤1
https://predict.fun?ref=477B8 метрики растут каждый день фарм опиниона подходит к концу будет первым проектом для выхода вы все еще скипаете? лошары.
😁4❤1
https://app.opinion.trade?code=m38xpp пост лень пистаь просто по рефке зайдите потрейдите да
https://predict.fun?ref=477B8 надо делать друзья.
😁3
🟢 #LIT Liquidated Short: $183K at $4.42 - hyperlens
каждый мог.
LIGHTER IS OVER, ONTO THE NEXT ONE PREDICT.FUN - новая машина для фарма. backed by yzilabs, фаундер дингалинг (тот который лаунчил панкейк и буп), сапорт от CZ. Мета предикшен маркетов + сапорт от цз + астер паттерн = биг миллиарды. Сейчас идет только первая неделя поэтому вы супер EARLY. Фармим на этом маркете, еще можно попытаться половить спреды, но так как площадке 3 дня, то маркетов маловато. Работаем. Зараб…
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @switchtalking. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 401,594 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“switch” (@switchtalking), 1,738 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/switchtalking.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.