quick $3k/day
π₯15β€5π3

Channel
@swift_ofm
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Stars Β· Posts Β· Cite this entry
970subscribers
+9 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002242609092 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @swift_ofm |
| Created | Between 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 5 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 23 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/swift_ofm |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 23 Aug 2026, 09:08 | 970 | +5 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 15:24 | 965 | +3 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 06:01 | 962 | +1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 00:47 | 961 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:07 | 961 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 October 2024 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 April 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β not this channelβs whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegramβs own rounded chrome, so it carries no β mark.
483 reactions across 20 posts, in 26 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| β€ | 242 | 50.1% | |
| π₯ | 89 | 18.4% | |
| π | 35 | 7.25% | |
| π€― | 18 | 3.73% | |
| π― | 13 | 2.69% | |
| π³ | 11 | 2.28% | |
| π | 11 | 2.28% | |
| β€βπ₯ | 10 | 2.07% | |
| β | 9 | 1.86% | |
| π«‘ | 9 | 1.86% | |
| π | 5 | 1.04% | |
| πΎ | 4 | 0.828% | |
| π | 4 | 0.828% | |
| π | 3 | 0.621% | |
| π | 3 | 0.621% | |
| π¦ | 3 | 0.621% | |
| β‘ | 2 | 0.414% | |
| π | 2 | 0.414% | |
| π | 2 | 0.414% | |
| π | 2 | 0.414% | |
| 6 further kinds | 6 | 1.24% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 483reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 October 2024 to 10 April 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @swift_ofm. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 9 October 2024 to 10 April 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
quick $3k/day
π₯15β€5π3
I'll be a lot more active on here π€ I'm surprised all of these gurus have time to post 5x per day in their channelπ
β€15π3π2π₯2π1
0-50k: <2 months 0-30k: <1 month 10 to 120 paid/day: <1 month Some of my mentees wins π Discontinuing mentorship for now to focus on the agency, itβs been a great run π€ Great things don't last forever:) The opportunities you see today can disappear tomorrow. I am happy for all of the agencies Iβve helped get to the next level
β€19π―7π4π«‘4π2π₯°1π1
I hope everyone had a great break. I'm back to work in 60 minutes.
π₯12β3π«‘3β€1π1
I just dm'd 10 people in this group with something special, ill do 10 more tomorrow
β€24π9π7π₯3π1
Salary model progress: 20 days later im hitting 2k+ days. That will be another $50k profit monthly π° If you aren't getting started with salary you're missing out. I have 6 figures in my "current balance" on OF...waiting for the fiscal year to end π€£
β€20π³5β€βπ₯4π₯4π«‘2β1π1
Itβs Christmas/Christmas Eve for everyone. Take a day off and spend time with your friends + family. Donβt listen to the guru that tells you to work on new years and Christmas π€£. Iβll be more active after the 25th
β€17β5πΎ4π 3π1
If I type up a couple paragraphs of important information, would you read it? If 30% + of the views drop a like on this message, iβll type it up. If not, I have better things to do
β€73π18π³5π2π2
0-4k sub revenue in 60 days, not bad at all. Thatβs over 50k/month in revenue built in 2 months. Thereβs not many business models that can compete
β€11β‘2π―2π³1π1
2025 is right around the corner. Set a revenue goal and take the proper steps now so youβll be ready to reach it 2025 π
β€3
Onboarded 4 new salary models. Scaled this model to 50 paid subs/day within 3 weeks of working with her thatβs going to be at least another $50k/month
π₯5β€4π1π1
been on and off telegram these past few weeks. finally freed up time. answering dms
β€1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @swift_ofm. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions β Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 23 August 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βSwift OFM π€«β (@swift_ofm), 970 subscribers as measured 23 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swift_ofm.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.