5 measurements spanning 7 days, net +2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean βno change observedβ, never βinterpolatedβ. The vertical axis spans 5,796β5,803 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 10:24
5,802
+5
11 Aug 2026, 02:47
5,797
-2
8 Aug 2026, 10:55
5,799
-1
7 Aug 2026, 16:31
5,800
no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:28
5,800
first reading
Engagement
29 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pagesof Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR Β· 30 days
48.8%
avg views Γ· 5,802 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,830
29 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.97%
reactions Γ· views Β· ER floor
Posts in window
29
of 29 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) Γ· viewsβ note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegramβs public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days Β· latest post in window 11 August 2026
Posts held
29 (28 July 2026 β 11 August 2026)
Views total
82,127
Reactions total
2,443
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface β not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
12 Aug 2026, 05:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than βcorrectingβ the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form β 8.12K, 3.7M β so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded β read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
2,443 reactions across 29 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 49.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
β€
1,207
49.4%
π₯
616
25.2%
π
221
9.05%
π―
219
8.96%
π
81
3.32%
π€―
65
2.66%
π€
34
1.39%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β π is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β 4.34K, 1.2M β so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 29 of the 29 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegramβs own count on each post β not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β those same posts carry 2,443reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by βa reaction total printed elsewhere on the pageβ.
Measured over the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
2
of 29 we hold a reading for Β· 7%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars β bought with money β on a post by @sweetsielts. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 29 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegramβs short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
In some countries around the world men and women are having
children late in life. What are the reasons for this development? What are the effects on society and family life?
B1 - cause > pressures of modern life > high cost of living > become parents when they reach certain level of financial stability
B2 - effects on people > more mature to handle family responsibilities > better able to provide for their childrenβ¦
Overall, the volume of goods transported by all three modes increased, though to varying extents, with road transport recording a much steeper rise. Notably, although rail initially transported the largest volume of goods, it was overtaken by sea and especially road transport by the end.
The volume of goods transported by road recorded the most significant growth. Starting at around 0.4 million tonnes-kilometers, thβ¦
If old people are no longer physically, mentally, or financially able to look after themselves, younger family members should be legally responsible for supporting them. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Position: agree
B1 > parents provide support to their children when they are less capable > parents have moral rights to receive support from their children
B2 > encourages even those who lack moral principleβ¦
Overall, the proportion of senior male employees in all countries surveyed declined, though to varying extents, with the sharpest drop being recorded in Belgium. By contrast, female employees in their 60s followed a slightly different pattern: the percentage of such workers in the USA and Australia trended upwards, whereas that of those in Belgium and Japan fell modestly. Notably, Japan consistently boasted the largeβ¦
Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end world poverty and hunger. Others say that economic growth is damaging the environment and should stop. Discuss both views and give your own opinion
B1 > economic growth > stimulates innovation, created jobs and provide essential services
B2 > environmental degradation > extract natural recourses for fuel, clear forests to develop agriculture and natural waβ¦
Overall, a higher proportion of film releases did not necessarily translate into stronger ticket sales. It is clear that the production of drama, comedy and fantasy released increased and drama recorded sharper growth, remaining by far the most widely released genre, whereas romance accounted for the same lowest share in both years. Meanwhile, ticket sales of all types of films except romance rose modestly, with comeβ¦
Scientists tell us some activities are good for health and others are bad. Despite knowing that, millions of people continue doing unhealthy activities. What are the causes and what can be done?
B1 -> cause: human nature > instant gratification > prefer short-term pleasure > accumulation of unhealthy habits
B2 -> cause: develop addiction as a coping mechanism > relying on willpower is nearly impossible
B3 -> solutioβ¦
Overall, the ground floor has been repurposed twice so far, evolving from administrative premises into a residential space, after which it has become a commercial facility. It is also clear that all these alterations took place without significantly transforming the overall structure, though the interior layout has experienced notable changes.
In the first period, the site was primarily business-oriented. The accessβ¦
π€π€π€π€π€π€π€ 7οΈβ£π€0οΈβ£
Murodjon is a truly smart and disciplined person. He knows how to overcome obstacles and never gives up. Iβm so happy that he achieved this result. He absolutely deserves it.
Congratulations! π
P.S. We may OSR the listeningπ€·π»ββοΈ
#studentresult
Showing the 12 most recent of 29 posts we hold for @sweetsielts. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Kanal judayam tinchib qoldi. Challange boshlamoxchiman. Oldinlari ko'p qilardim keyin qop ketudi. Qanaqa challenge boshlaganim yaxshi?
Writing51%
Speaking49%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 29 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank β 1,414,928 of 1,480,944entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below β republished posts weigh more than named mentions β and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channelβs name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page β a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β the βNamed by N registered channelsβ figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 β this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπΊπππππβπ π°π¬π³π»πΊ | 9.0β (@sweetsielts), 5,802 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sweetsielts.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.
