Channel
@sweetredroses
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,239subscribers
-5 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001489841938 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @sweetredroses |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 12 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/sweetredroses |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 23:17 | 1,239 | -1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 20:12 | 1,240 | -4 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:48 | 1,244 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 1,244 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 9 January 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
102 reactions across 20 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 57 | 55.9% | |
| 😢 | 16 | 15.7% | |
| 👍 | 12 | 11.8% | |
| ❤🔥 | 5 | 4.90% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 3.92% | |
| 🙏 | 3 | 2.94% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 1.96% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 0.98% | |
| 🤩 | 1 | 0.98% | |
| 🥰 | 1 | 0.98% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 102reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 9 January 2025 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Happy Mother’s Day to all the moms out there! 💐 My mom has always been my rock and I’m so grateful for all the ways she continues to show up for my family. She’s taught me so much over the years, and I feel so lucky that I get to pass that same wisdom down to my own girls. To all the moms celebrating today, I hope you know how much you’re appreciated ❤️ @sweetredroses
❤3
You are deeply loved 🤍, Happy Valentine's Day everyone! @sweetredroses
❤2💯1🥰1
I’m too genuine to be your unsure thing. I’ve given enough to uncertainty, to waiting, to being almost chosen. It’s time to receive the kind of love that meets me fully. I deserve a love that doesn’t question whether I’m worth it, but knows it. @sweetredroses
❤3🔥1
Happy New Year 2026, everyone 🎆🎇 May God bless us every day in 2026 and fill your life with peace and love ❤️ #newyear2026 #kuchingsarawak #malaysia @sweetredroses
❤🔥4❤2
Never leave a true relationship for few faults. Nobody is perfect. Nobody is correct at the end. Affection is always greator than perfection.. @sweetredroses
❤2
I wish that I could see into the future, see whether I'd still be thinking about you all day every day. see whether you'd call me, Telling me that you love me. or if it would all just be gone our love, our humour, us... @sweetredroses
❤3😢2
“There is no perfect relationship, it’s just two people who choose each other and choose to not give up.” 🤍 @sweetredroses
❤9
Your plan may be small, but God’s plan is always blooming beyond your imagination. 🌸✨ @sweetredroses
❤5🙏2
In a world of love, it's unfair. Admiring someone without fear. Same feelings, we thought. confused as the mind and heart fought In a peaceful evening, eyes did meet. Staring deeply, lost in reality. Avoiding gaze with a simple smile, Heart racing, felt the butterfly. At first, laughing in happiness, At second, crying in sadness. Assuming things, once we hold. Expectation hurts, felt so cold. In silent night, we w…
❤4❤🔥1
It's midnight ,I'm tired. Sleep calls but I cannot sleep. Sleeping gives me time to think With time to think , I think about you. That's the worst possible thing I could do. @sweetredroses
👍4❤1🙏1
You asked me this question thousand times, And I'll never get tired to answer, We're not the same. We're different in a good way . What they said wasn't true . Whatever you've been told, You're worth more than gold . @sweetredroses
❤3🤩1
As time passed, I slowly learned to let go of my anger. However, I also didn't quickly forget everything that had happened before. I didn't really lose you, because all the memories were still clear in my mind. Right now I just want to make peace with time. Because what I know is that time will never be wrong in bringing us together or separating us. @sweetredroses
😢3❤1👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sweetredroses. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Citation-graph rank — 295,729 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“The Red Roses 🌹” (@sweetredroses), 1,239 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sweetredroses.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.