5 measurements spanning 14 days, net +6. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 102–110 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
21 Aug 2026, 16:28
109
+3
15 Aug 2026, 01:18
106
+2
9 Aug 2026, 09:17
104
no change
7 Aug 2026, 20:55
104
+1
7 Aug 2026, 14:03
103
first reading
Engagement
15 posts held, back to 14 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
79.2%
avg views ÷ 109 subscribers
Avg views / post
86.3
7 posts measured
Reaction rate
8.08%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
7
of 15 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 4 of 7 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
15 (14 July 2026 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
604
Reactions total
35
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
9 Aug 2026, 09:17 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Reaction mix
157 reactions across 12 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 18.5% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
29
18.5%
❤🔥
22
14.0%
🤩
17
10.8%
😍
15
9.55%
💘
11
7.01%
🍓
10
6.37%
🔥
10
6.37%
🙏
10
6.37%
☃
9
5.73%
🥰
9
5.73%
🎉
6
3.82%
🏆
5
3.18%
💯
2
1.27%
👍
1
0.637%
🤗
1
0.637%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 157reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
В малине и маракуйе есть косточки. Что вам больше нравится?
С косточками чувствуется натуральность. Пусть будут 🍋59%
Лучше без них 🤩45%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Тропические начинки часто ассоциируют с летним периодом 🥭
Хоть лето и подходит к концу, в скором времени будут добавлены такие начинки как:
• Манго-малина
• Клубника-маракуйя
И по этому поводу у меня к вам важный вопрос 🍂
«Лаванда-лимон-мак» 🌹🍋
Новая начинка, которая прошла дегустацию и будет в обновлённом прайсе😍
Что входит:
- лавандовый бисквит
- специальная пропитка, разработанная мной
- лимонный ганаш на белом шоколаде с маком
- лимонный курд
- классический кремчиз
При заказе можно будет оставить или убрать лимонную цедру из ганаша. Она даёт лёгкую приятную горчинку, но конечно же всё будет учитываться по вашим вкусам 💛
Всем доброго вечера! 🌄
В понедельник на продажу буду выставлять три набора трайфлов по 4 шт, начинка двойная клубника 🍓 (ванильный бисквит, клубничное конфи, клубничный мусс, классический кремчиз)
Цена одной коробочки - 1200 руб
Уже сейчас можно бронировать 🤩
Всем доброго дня ☀️
На улице сегодня жара, а я продолжаю разработку и практику авторских начинок для тортов, трайфлов и бенто тортов 🍰
После завершения весь прайс будет обновлён. Цены поменяются только у новых начинок 🌟
Также в продаже появятся Капкейки 🥰 Пока будет доступно три вкуса (в дальнейшем возможно расширение), заказ от 6 штук!!!
Если кого-то заинтересовали Капкейки - пишите в лс, уже сейчас можно оформит…
🍊🫚 «Апельсин-имбирь-клюква»
К вашему вниманию 🤲
Специально для таких же любителей цитрусовых десертов, как и я!!!
Постаралась для вас сделать фотографию разреза, не могла не поделиться, попыталась все красиво и наглядно сфотографировать 📸
Что входит:
- имбирно-апельсиновый бисквит с орехом пекан
- апельсиновая пропитка
- апельсиновый ганаш на белом шоколаде
- клюквенная карамель с имбирем
Фото разреза не будет из-за жидкой начинки, но решение уже нашлось 🏆
В скором времени вы сможете прочитать отзывы людей, которые уже попробовали новую, разработанную мной начинку🌟
Следующий пост будет про сами составляющие торта и в скором времени он появится в продаже ☺️
Подписывайтесь на телеграмм канал и следите за новинками!!!
❤6❤🔥4🎉3👍1💯1🙏1
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @sweet_cherry_l. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
В малине и маракуйе есть косточки. Что вам больше нравится?
С косточками чувствуется натуральность. Пусть будут 🍋59%
Лучше без них 🤩45%
The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none.The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100.Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 14 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 21 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“SWEET_CHERRY” (@sweet_cherry_l), 109 subscribers as measured 21 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sweet_cherry_l.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.