https://t.me/antiextortionnetworkofficiall

Channel
swatted.wtf
@swattedwtf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
2,391subscribers
+781 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1002617902027 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @swattedwtf |
| Created | Between 1 March 2025 and 31 July 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 9 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/swattedwtf |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 2,391 | +52 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 21:22 | 2,339 | no change |
| 3 Sept 2026, 20:57 | 2,339 | +117 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 02:47 | 2,222 | +32 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 20:47 | 2,190 | +28 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 18:19 | 2,162 | +48 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 01:25 | 2,114 | +89 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 06:14 | 2,025 | +152 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 20:58 | 1,873 | +169 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 10:14 | 1,704 | +75 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 07:10 | 1,629 | +19 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 1,610 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 7 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
- ERR · 30 days
- 47.0%
- avg views ÷ 2,391 subscribers
- Avg views / post
- 1,120
- 6 posts measured
- Reaction rate
- 0.83%
- reactions ÷ views · ER floor
- Posts in window
- 6
- of 20 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 September 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (7 July 2026 – 4 September 2026) |
| Views total | 6,743 |
| Reactions total | 56 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 6 Sept 2026, 21:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
- Video runtime
- 3m 45s
- Average length
- 1m 53s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
224 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 34.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 77 | 34.4% | |
| 🔥 | 77 | 34.4% | |
| 🤡 | 34 | 15.2% | |
| 👍 | 18 | 8.04% | |
| 😭 | 8 | 3.57% | |
| 🍾 | 4 | 1.79% | |
| 👀 | 2 | 0.893% | |
| 🌭 | 1 | 0.446% | |
| 🍌 | 1 | 0.446% | |
| 👎 | 1 | 0.446% | |
| 🙉 | 1 | 0.446% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 224 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 7 July 2026 to 4 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
- Stars received
- 273
- across the posts below
- Posts paid on
- 5
- of 20 we hold a reading for · 25%
- Most on one post
- 86
- single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @swattedwtf. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 July 2026 to 4 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Recent posts
One modules has been updated · swattedw.tf ⚙️ US Person Search US Person Search ahs been updated and is now back online. We are currently working on bringing back the other non working modules, If you have any suggestions on what you would like to see on swattedw.tf please let us know, we listen to the community and will try our best! @swatted_bot 🔗 https://swattedw.tf | https://qemuly.swattedw.tf ❔ @swatted_bot 💭…
❤5
swattedw.tf | Quemly We have officially released our latest flagship model, Quemly Q. We spent nearly a month building it, and we are proud of the result. Our goal was to move Quemly past simply querying modules and showing whatever came back. Quemly Q investigates every account on its own. For example: when Quemly finds a TikTok account, it studies the profile, and if there is a video, it reviews the latest one f…
🔥10🤡6❤1😭1
Several modules have been updated · swattedw.tf 🛡 Skiptracer -> US Person Search Skiptracer has been renamed to US Person Search and rebuilt on higher-quality providers. For now, it's focused on the US only. We're already working on expanding it into a global lookup, adding each country individually, starting with Europe. We prioritize quality over quantity, so we won't just ship an unreliable global person-search m…
❤11😭1🙉1
We apologize for the recent inactivity Please go ahead and create a ticket at @swatted_bot and let us know what is currently broken, what needs to be fixed, or what features you would like to see added to swattedw.tf 🔗 https://swattedw.tf | https://qemuly.swattedw.tf ❔ @swatted_bot 💭 @swattedwtfchat
👍9🤡3
IntelX Update - swattedw.tf 🔎 IntelX IntelX has been updated with a more reliable provider, resulting in faster searches, improved reliability, and better uptime. Rate limits have also been slightly adjusted to help protect the overall infrastructure and maintain stable performance for everyone. 🔗 https://swattedw.tf | https://qemuly.swattedw.tf ❔ @swatted_bot 💭 @swattedwtfchat
❤7🔥1
Important Information Regarding Account Recovery A lot of users have been abusing our previous recovery system, so we have fully changed how account recovery works. We will no longer transfer a plan to a new account under any circumstances, even if proof of ownership or payment can be provided. We will only be able to recover your lost or old account if you have Recovery Information set up on it. If you have not set …
👍9
New Module & Platform Improvements - swattedw.tf 📱 Telegram Messages Search the messages people have sent across Telegram. We run our own database and index messages from 1,700+ channels and groups, updated around the clock. If we don't have any archived messages for your search, we run a live search on Telegram and index whatever new messages we find, so you get results instantly and they're saved for everyone nex…
❤8
👀 (will be fully open source)
🔥45🤡22❤5🍾4👀2🌭1🍌1
All prior tickets have been deleted, create a new one if support is still needed
🤡2
We've completely rebuilt how support works at Swatted, Instead of messages getting lost, every request now becomes a proper ticket that a real support team picks up, answers, and follows through on until it's sorted. Getting help is simple. Message our official Telegram bot @swatted_bot and tap "Contact support." Pick the category that fits (billing, account, plan, technical, or other), write out what's going on, an…
❤9
New module has been added to swattedw.tf ⚡ Roblox Server Intel - Beta Link your live Roblox server and watch every player resolve into a full - in real time. As people join they're checked against - log intelligence automatically: - hits, linked Discord, account age and their full profile. Flag anyone to highlight them in-game, and get told the moment someone you've seen in a past server shows up again. How to u…
🔥8❤2👎1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @swattedwtf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“swatted.wtf” (@swattedwtf), 2,391 subscribers as measured 9 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/swattedwtf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.