Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

Channel

Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

@svoi_vector

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

34,271subscribers

-129 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002446834809
TypeChannel
Username@svoi_vector
DescriptionЧестность. Опора на пути к себе. Сотрудничество: @oleh_trydaga @indeec17 @garant_dima PM: @maksim_pomogach, @juliii_pro, @exalove
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/svoi_vector

Growth

34,27134,40034,335.57 August 2026 — 34,400 subscribers7 August 2026 — 34,400 subscribers8 August 2026 — 34,389 subscribers9 August 2026 — 34,373 subscribers10 August 2026 — 34,355 subscribers11 August 2026 — 34,342 subscribers12 August 2026 — 34,331 subscribers13 August 2026 — 34,297 subscribers14 August 2026 — 34,271 subscribers7 August 202614 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 7 days, net -129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 34,252–34,419 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Aug 2026, 21:5434,271-26
13 Aug 2026, 13:3534,297-34
12 Aug 2026, 15:1434,331-11
11 Aug 2026, 12:2834,342-13
10 Aug 2026, 11:4834,355-18
9 Aug 2026, 11:3234,373-16
8 Aug 2026, 14:0634,389-11
7 Aug 2026, 17:0034,400no change
7 Aug 2026, 16:5134,400first reading

Engagement

46 posts held, back to 6 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 29 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.46%
avg views ÷ 34,271 subscribers
Avg views / post
499
46 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.675%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
46
of 46 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 38 of 46 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held46 (6 August 202615 August 2026)
Views total22,956
Reactions total136
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Aug 2026, 18:28 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
1,660
Videos
425
Links
2,210

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

136 reactions across 37 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9066.2%
4230.9%
🔥21.47%
🙏21.47%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 38 of the 46 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 136reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 46 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

15 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC118 viewsread 15 August 2026
Video

Что сегодня забирало силы, хотя формально не было задачей? Назвать нагрузку — уже перестать обвинять себя за то, что вы не робот. Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

15 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC265 views1 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Перед планом на завтра выпишите невидимую нагрузку: — что висит в голове; — чего вы ждёте; — какие разговоры откладываете; — за что переживаете; — где нужно принять решение. Потом планируйте меньше. Это не слабость, а точность. Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

1

15 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC344 viewsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Ошибка планирования часто в том, что мы считаем только часы. Но психика тратит силы не только на действия. Она тратит их на переключения, неопределённость, контроль, сдерживание эмоций, подготовку к неприятным разговорам. Если этого не учитывать, любой план будет казаться доказательством вашей «несобранности». Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

15 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC389 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

Не вся нагрузка видна в списке дел. Есть ещё ожидание ответа, тревога за близких, незавершённый разговор, необходимость помнить мелочи, внутренние споры, фоновые решения. Иногда день выглядит свободным, но внутри уже занято. Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

👍3

14 Aug 2026, 17:15 UTC463 views6 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🌙 Где сегодня вы держались хорошо, но слишком дорого? И как могла бы выглядеть опора без внутреннего сжатия? Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

5👍1

14 Aug 2026, 13:00 UTC468 views2 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🫁 Проверьте тело. Где сейчас лишнее напряжение: челюсть, плечи, живот, дыхание, спина? Расслабьте одну зону и спросите: что я пытаюсь удержать таким усилием? Иногда ответ появляется быстрее, чем через длинный анализ. Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

👍2

14 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC485 views3 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🧩 Есть разница между опорой и зажимом. Опора помогает выдерживать жизнь. Зажим заставляет делать вид, что вам ничего не стоит то, что на самом деле стоит много. Настоящая собранность не отменяет внутреннюю правду. Она даёт ей форму, в которой можно двигаться дальше. Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

👍3

14 Aug 2026, 05:00 UTC486 views4 reactionsread 15 August 2026
Photo

🌿 Собранность — это не значит стать каменной. Можно быть собранной и при этом чувствовать. Можно держать направление и признавать усталость. Можно действовать без того, чтобы сжимать себя до функции. Свой вектор | Саморазвитие

3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 46 posts we hold for @svoi_vector. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Свой вектор | Саморазвитие” (@svoi_vector), 34,271 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svoi_vector.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.