Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Exposing Rejects O9A

Channel

Exposing Rejects O9A

@svobodadonbass

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

2,285subscribers

-77 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719053598
TypeChannel
Username@svobodadonbass
Created15 February 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/svobodadonbass

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 16 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

2,2852,3622,323.56 August 2026 — 2,362 subscribers6 August 2026 — 2,362 subscribers9 August 2026 — 2,358 subscribers12 August 2026 — 2,355 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,351 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,349 subscribers22 August 2026 — 2,346 subscribers26 August 2026 — 2,342 subscribers28 August 2026 — 2,341 subscribers31 August 2026 — 2,337 subscribers3 September 2026 — 2,333 subscribers9 September 2026 — 2,329 subscribers13 September 2026 — 2,311 subscribers17 September 2026 — 2,285 subscribers6 August 202617 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -77. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,273–2,374 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 00:372,285-26
13 Sept 2026, 04:212,311-18
9 Sept 2026, 01:192,329-4
3 Sept 2026, 16:412,333-4
31 Aug 2026, 17:442,337-4
28 Aug 2026, 18:052,341-1
26 Aug 2026, 02:042,342-4
22 Aug 2026, 17:152,346-3
19 Aug 2026, 08:552,349-2
16 Aug 2026, 02:052,351-4
12 Aug 2026, 18:442,355-3
9 Aug 2026, 20:112,358-4
6 Aug 2026, 11:172,362no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:552,362first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 29 June 2023the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 June 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 48s
Average length
2m 24s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

184 reactions across 13 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤔5731.0%
😁4926.6%
👍3217.4%
2614.1%
🔥137.07%
😢52.72%
🥰21.09%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 184 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2023 to 11 June 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Jun 2025, 23:54 UTC836 views5 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Protectors and Guardians of Ukraine, they are only here to protect the Ukrainian people and stop the Kiev Junta, nothing else is going on, no war crimes or O9A activity going on here at all. Sources (something Russia hates): t.me/dshrg2/2202 https://www.gazeta.ru/social/news/2024/08/20/23731159.shtml?updated The first link is the original link to the post, but it was removed after the State Duma made them delete

🤔5

29 Mar 2025, 03:31 UTC≈1,170 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SecurelyContactingCIAVideo

Video, posted without a caption

29 Mar 2025, 03:31 UTC≈1,050 views3 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SecurelyContactingCIA

В этом видео показан вымышленный #россиянин, который принял трудное, но важное решение негласно выйти на контакт с #ЦРУ через анонимную информационную систему Tor. ЦРУ хочет знать правду о #России, и мы ищем надежных людей, которые знают и могут рассказать нам эту правду. Ваша информация может быть более ценной, чем Вы думаете. Мы понимаем, что россияне могут пойти на контакт с ЦРУ в силу самых разных обстоятельств.

2🤔1

29 Mar 2025, 03:31 UTC657 viewsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SecurelyContactingCIAVideo

Почему я пошел на контакт с ЦРУ: мое решение

29 Mar 2025, 03:31 UTC721 views1 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @SecurelyContactingCIA

Проект Tor: ((Project Tor) https://torproject.org Скрытый Tor-сайт ЦРУ: ((CIA’s Tor Hidden Service Site)) ciadotgov4sjwlzihbbgxnqg3xiyrg7so2r2o3lt5wz5ypk4sxyjstad.onion cia dot gov 4sj wlz ihb bgx nqg 3xi yrg 7so 2r2 o3l t5w z5y pk4 sxy jstad.onion Our global mission demands that individuals be able to reach out to #CIA securely from anywhere. This video shows fictionalized Russians making the difficult but import

🤔1

29 Mar 2025, 02:49 UTC658 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Many of my old DPR contacts have also said to me that they were abandoned by Russia once the invasion started. The people that I helped promote on here, such as Kalmius. They were given nothing by Russia and no support, they were ignored once their usefulness ended, which was to be used as a match to spark the invasion.

👍5🤔3🥰1

29 Mar 2025, 02:34 UTC639 views6 reactionsread 7 August 2026

If you are a Russian and you truly want to bring about change in your country and not have to put up with being lied to by the people that you serve, I invite you to enlist in the Russian Volunteer Corps. There, you can truly fight to change your country and tear it out from the Soviet hands that have infested it for so long.

🤔5🔥1

29 Mar 2025, 02:31 UTC718 views9 reactionsread 7 August 2026

Unless you're actually fucking retarded or you're just a yes man with no thoughts of your own, you should realize that lying to your people constantly about things is not sustainable. The Ukraine invasion was not for denazification. It was not as a response to aggression because they themselves were the ones that started the unrest in Donbass via sending agents. It is purely driven by Soviet irredentism. Russia d

🤔63

29 Mar 2025, 02:24 UTC746 views8 reactionsread 7 August 2026

I want you all, my loyal subscribers, to really think about what I'm going to say: Do you really believe that the Kremlin, who knowingly promote verifiable lies and bullshit to their citizens every day, who constantly slander other countries with verifiable lies, have your best interests in mind? I am saying this as somebody who lived that experience. Who, myself, admit to knowingly promoting things I knew were fa

😁62

29 Mar 2025, 02:19 UTC795 views2 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @spgdevgroup

https://www.thesun.co.uk/news/34120757/putins-hero-russia-killed-marat-tibilov/

🤔2

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @svobodadonbass. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Exposing Rejects O9A” (@svobodadonbass), 2,285 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svobodadonbass.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.