9 measurements spanning 7 days, net +66. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 16,962–17,048 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 14:25
17,038
+2
13 Aug 2026, 01:44
17,036
+12
12 Aug 2026, 00:53
17,024
+10
10 Aug 2026, 21:51
17,014
+5
9 Aug 2026, 20:12
17,009
+15
8 Aug 2026, 17:35
16,994
+13
7 Aug 2026, 16:57
16,981
+9
7 Aug 2026, 13:16
16,972
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:04
16,972
first reading
Engagement
48 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 21 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
35.2%
avg views ÷ 17,038 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,000
48 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.55%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
48
of 48 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 August 2026
Posts held
48 (2 August 2026 – 15 August 2026)
Views total
288,232
Reactions total
10,218
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
15 Aug 2026, 15:39 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Photos
≈1,600
Videos
≈31
Links
≈108
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 15 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
Reaction mix
10,218 reactions across 48 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
👍
6,200
60.7%
😭
1,077
10.5%
🤮
1,022
10.0%
🤡
730
7.14%
💩
415
4.06%
🤬
367
3.59%
🖕
295
2.89%
👎
112
1.10%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 48 of the 48 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,218reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 48 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 48 we hold a reading for · 27%
Most on one post
5
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @svntsmhrmn. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 48 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 15 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
⚡️ГЕННАДИЧЬ,А КАК ПОНИМАТЬ СЛОВА ЕСЛИ Я ТУПАЯ ШПАНА С ИНТЕРНАТА И НЕ МОГУ СВОИМ СКИСШИМ ТИКТОК МОЗГОМ ОСИЛИТЬ ЧТИВО УРОВНЯ /B
никак.с этим только б-г поможет.
вернее должен был помочь,ещё лет 10 назад.щас если ты не в силах раскусить базовых метафор и понять шо там автор сверху пытается разжевать нууу всё тогда.без вариантов уже.диагноз нахуй.
⚡️ФОРМА vs СОДЕРЖАНИЕ,ГОВНО vs МОЧА,ИГОРЬ МАТЬ ЕГО ГОФМАН,Я НОЧЬЮ ОБОССАЛСЯ ПЬЯНЫЙ
шизофазия - речевое расстройство, при котором предложения могут быть построены правильно, но содержание их становится совершенно бессмысленным
в наш час можно сколько угодно ебать нести свет, быть 228 раз гением, какать в мозг детям высокими материями, но какой в этом толк, если ты всего лишь скучный фембой с хайповым СДВГ?
другое д…
⚡️АХТУНГ,все лонгриды в канале и видосы на этом аккаунте в данный период времени имеют практическое применение,градус абсурда намерено срезан к минимально допустимым значениям,шоб окислённый мозг средней мухи ХОТЬ ЧТО-ТО понял,ДУМАЙ ТЕ
⚡️ГЕННАДИЧЬ А ВОТ КАК ПРЕОДОЛЕТЬ ЧУВСТВО СТЫДА?! Я В ДЕТСТВЕ СТИХ РАССКАЗЫВАЛ ПЕРЕД КЛАССОМ, МЯМЛИЛ, ЧВЯКАЛ, ТАМ ХУЯКАЛ, МАЛЬЧИШКИ ГРОМКО СМЕЯЛИСЬ НАДО МНОЙ, НО ЩАС-ТО МНЕ УЖЕ 25, ВОН КАКОЙ ВЫМАХАЛ ПИДРИЛА, А ВСЁ РАВНО БОЮСЬ РАССКАЗЫВАТЬ О СВОЕЙ СТРАСТИ ПЕРЕОДЕВАТЬСЯ В ЖЕНСКОЕ
понимая, что тебе предстоит бой не на жизнь, а на смерть с огромным чернокожим рэпером айсгергертом, у тебя есть два варианта развития событи…
‼️я буду мямлить чвякать блять хуякать столько сколько мне вздумается ебать
мне положено по праву умеющего,учите матчасть пацыки это называется поэтическая вольность и так можно только тем кто умеет в сложную материю составлять предложения для публики дебилов 12 у.о.
⚡️дорогие мухи, немного приоткрою занавеску мрака по теме,давно известной в узких кругах ещё со времён древних мыслителей, фалософов, политиков и прочих тунеядцев
шоб не жалея печень, фуллтайм пьянствовать во ВСЕ времена, нужно было одно - монетизировать то единственное что дано каждому по праву рождения - язык с минимально функционирующей речью
(да, лизать старую пизду тоже вариант, но об этом в другой раз)
никак…
А ВОТ ГЕРМАН ГЕННАДИЧЬ БУХАЕТ КАЖДЫЙ ДЕНЬ,А НА ПРАЦЮ НЕ ХОДИТ Я ТАК ТОЖЕ СМОГУ ВЫХОДИТ?!
бро🙏
🤮73🤬20💩15🤡5👍4😭2
Showing the 12 most recent of 48 posts we hold for @svntsmhrmn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Posts edited after publishing
@svntsmhrmn edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
15 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026
Citation-graph rank
Citation-graph rank — 10,798 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“герман свенцим” (@svntsmhrmn), 17,038 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svntsmhrmn.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.