Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 💡Нет света Одесса | Тутешні

Channel

💡Нет света Одесса | Тутешні

@svitlo_off

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,227subscribers

-54 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001782483852
TypeChannel
Username@svitlo_off
Description👋Дорогі Одесити канал створений з метою допомоги повідомленням про відключення світла💡води🚰 та корисної інформації По всім питанням, опублікувати рекламу/вакансію, поділитися контентом — @Pivdene_Bot Чат для спілкування — https://t.me/+nO7-0NSAOJA5OGZi
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 November 2026
Measurements held61
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/svitlo_off

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 87% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 9 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 8 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@IzmaiL_Tuteshni/69478 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC@svitlo_off/12674 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@IzmaiL_Tuteshni/721927 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC@svitlo_off/12864 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC1.00under a minute
@IzmaiL_Tuteshni/72992 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC@svitlo_off/12915 · this entry2 Sept 2026, 07:32 UTC1.0072 seconds
@IzmaiL_Tuteshni/82102 Nov 2026, 05:14 UTC@svitlo_off/13773 · this entry2 Nov 2026, 05:14 UTC1.00under a minute
@Belgorod_dnestrovsk/58318 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC@svitlo_off/12674 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 05:26 UTC1.00under a minute
@Belgorod_dnestrovsk/606127 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC@svitlo_off/12864 · this entry27 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC1.00under a minute
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@IzmaiL_Tuteshni58 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@IzmaiL_Tuteshni (39–19)
@Belgorod_dnestrovsk57 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Belgorod_dnestrovsk (34–23)
@chornomorsk_tuteshni54 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@chornomorsk_tuteshni (49–5)
@VeLikodoLinskoe_News44 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@VeLikodoLinskoe_News (29–15)
@pivdenne_news37 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@pivdenne_news (21–16)
@podilsk_tuteshni36 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (20–16)
@Odessa_Afish19 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minutethis entry (11–8)
@Boyarka_Fastiv8 (8/8 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@Boyarka_Fastiv (7–1)
@izumtuteshni6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.00under a minute@izumtuteshni (4–2)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 147 of the 147 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 169 comparable posts for this entry, running 5 August 2026 to 13 November 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 8 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @podilsk_tuteshni. That is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_mutual, last confirmed 14 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 8 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Growth

11,96212,28112,121.512,2277 August 202612 November 2026
61 measurements spanning 97 days, net -54. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 11,914–12,329 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 61
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Nov 2026, 20:3812,227+27
10 Nov 2026, 12:3612,200+15
8 Nov 2026, 23:1012,185+18
7 Nov 2026, 13:4712,167+17
6 Nov 2026, 16:1012,150+3
5 Nov 2026, 17:4912,147+63
4 Nov 2026, 20:0612,084+43
3 Nov 2026, 22:0712,041+79
2 Nov 2026, 22:5011,962-2
2 Nov 2026, 01:0911,964-8
30 Oct 2026, 23:5411,972-3
30 Oct 2026, 00:2911,975-7
28 Oct 2026, 23:0411,982-1
28 Oct 2026, 00:1911,983-5
26 Oct 2026, 23:5411,988+3
25 Oct 2026, 22:2711,985-5
24 Oct 2026, 22:3011,990-6
24 Oct 2026, 00:5711,996-1
23 Oct 2026, 01:3111,997-7
21 Oct 2026, 22:3712,004first reading

Engagement

286 posts held, back to 5 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 72 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
55.4%
avg views ÷ 12,227 subscribers
Avg views / post
6,770
100 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.297%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
100
of 286 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 98 of 100 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 14 November 2026
Posts held286 (5 August 2026 – 14 November 2026)
Views total676,885
Reactions total1,989
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken14 Nov 2026, 09:25 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈6,060
Videos
≈1,520
Links
≈8,720

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 14 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
18m 54s
Average length
39s

Measured directly from 29 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

4,870 reactions across 260 posts, in 43 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🤬1,10922.8%
❤91218.7%
😢3857.91%
🙏3386.94%
🤡3206.57%
🖕2715.56%
👎2675.48%
👍1893.88%
😭1793.68%
💩1663.41%
😱1432.94%
🤮1322.71%
😁1132.32%
😡651.33%
🤯531.09%
🔥420.862%
🤔310.637%
🥰280.575%
🤣260.534%
👏160.329%
23 further kinds851.75%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 267 of the 286 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,870 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 286 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 285 we hold a reading for · 0.4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @svitlo_off. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 286 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 5 August 2026 to 14 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 100 posts held from the last 30 days (2.00%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

14 Nov 2026, 08:20 UTC865 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026

😡 Вранці 14 листопада росія атакувала енергетичний об’єкт ДТЕК «Одеські електромережі» на півночі Одещини Унаслідок удару майже 50 тисяч споживачів залишилися без електроенергії.

😢4❤1🖕1

14 Nov 2026, 06:14 UTC≈2,150 views56 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚡ График отключений света 14 ноября *Обновлено: 🔄 14 ноября 05:54

👍35🤔8🔥6🙏6🎉1

13 Nov 2026, 16:59 UTC≈3,030 views3 reactionsread 14 November 2026

😡 Група 1.2 — відключення з 18:34 до 22:30 Стабілізаційні відключення

❤3

13 Nov 2026, 14:30 UTC≈3,470 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

💡 Знову оновлення по світлу на сьогодні

💩9❤8👀7

13 Nov 2026, 14:00 UTC≈3,510 views17 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Оновлення графіку

👍12❤5

13 Nov 2026, 10:39 UTC≈3,490 views16 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Протягом останньої доби ворог продовжував атакувати об’єкти енергетичної інфраструктури. Через наслідки ворожих ударів є знеструмлення споживачів у Дніпропетровській, Донецькій, Запорізькій, Житомирській, Київській, Миколаївській, Одеській, Рівненській, Сумській, Харківській, Хмельницькій та Чернігівській областях.

😱9😢4🤮3

13 Nov 2026, 08:02 UTC≈3,710 views46 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

Унаслідок атаки РФ на Одесу загинули 44-річна та 50-річна жінки, повідомила речниця Одеської обласної прокуратури Інна Верба. Травмувалися ще шестеро містян: четверо жінок віком 47–73 років і двоє чоловіків віком 24 і 42 років. Усіх потерпілих госпіталізували. Вони перебувають у стані середньої тяжкості.

😢40❤5😱1

13 Nov 2026, 06:05 UTC≈3,700 views35 reactionsread 14 November 2026

❗️Внаслідок атаки на Одесу пошкоджено одноповерховий приватний житловий будинок, — МВА Є загиблі

🤬21😢6🙏5❤1💔1🤣1

12 Nov 2026, 18:58 UTC≈21,400 views18 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

⚡ График отключений света 13 ноября

❤11🖕3🤬2😢2

12 Nov 2026, 17:20 UTC≈3,960 views24 reactionsread 14 November 2026

Угроза баллистики с Крыма Радар Тутешні

🤬16🙏6❤2

12 Nov 2026, 17:05 UTC≈4,050 views4 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

🚨 В Одесі вилучили уламки ворожого дрона, що влучив у багатоповерхівку 12 листопада під час чергової російської атаки безпілотник влучив у фасад багатоповерхового житлового будинку на рівні 16-го поверху. Унаслідок удару дрон зруйнувався, а його бойова частина впала на дах автомийки та вибухнула. На щастя, обійшлося без постраждалих. 👮‍♂️ Вибухотехніки поліції обстежили територію на наявність небезпечних предметів…

🤡3❤1

12 Nov 2026, 15:05 UTC≈3,780 views6 reactionsread 14 November 2026
Photo

😡На Одещині 13 листопада прогнозують туман і сильний вітер Уночі та вранці видимість через туман знизиться до 200–500 метрів. Упродовж дня очікуються пориви південного вітру швидкістю до 20 м/с.

❤4🤣1😢1

Showing the 12 most recent of 286 posts we hold for @svitlo_off. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 4 posts on @svitlo_off as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
7 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
23 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
1

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 7 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Одеса | Графіки | Світло
@odesa_svitlo_svet1 · 36,206
Telegram ranks this channel #6 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 3 September 2026
Черный список Одесса
@black_list_odessa · 23,153
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 19 September 2026
Оренда квартир в Одесі | ДОВГОСТРОКОВО - ПОДОБОВО
@arendavodesse_odessa · 21,981
Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 55 here — alongside 54 others — read 25 September 2026
ОДЕССА ИНФО LIVE - радар Одеса
@odessa_inform · 375,614
Telegram ranks this channel #21 of 75 here — alongside 74 others — read 10 August 2026
Сповіщення | Новини. Одеса
@odesa_daily · 53,002
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 27 August 2026
Одесса как она есть
@odessapublic · 306,169
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 10 August 2026
Повестки Одесса
@pov_od · 19,800
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 2 October 2026
Світло ОДЕСА | Вода, Газ
@odesa_svet1 · 20,609
Telegram ranks this channel #27 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 22 September 2026
Повестки Одесса
@povestky · 54,666
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 68 here — alongside 67 others — read 23 August 2026
Chornomorsk INFO
@ourChornomorsk · 23,079
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 23 September 2026
Одесса как она есть | Паблик Одесса
@odessa_kak_ona_est · 38,776
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 29 August 2026
Одесса INFO ⚓️ 🇺🇦 Новости | Одеса
@odessa_infonews · 990,973
Telegram ranks this channel #32 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 8 August 2026
ОДЕССА ИНФО | Свет | Радар
@inform_odesa · 32,761
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 3 September 2026
Черноморск, как он есть
@chornomorsk · 30,098
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 8 September 2026
Новости Одесса | Одеса
@our_odessa · 437,561
Telegram ranks this channel #37 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 10 August 2026
Новини Ізмаїл || Новости Измаил 🌱🍃
@izmailnovostii · 25,880
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 52 here — alongside 51 others — read 14 September 2026
🚨КАЛІБР🚨
@temporis_odesa · 93,144
Telegram ranks this channel #42 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 17 August 2026
Одеса ⚡️Новини
@odesa_insider_2022 · 39,628
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 77 here — alongside 76 others — read 29 August 2026
Сила Громади
@Sila_GO · 315,622
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 11 August 2026
Где повестки Одесса?
@agendaOdessa · 129,916
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 73 here — alongside 72 others — read 16 August 2026
Пульс Одессы
@Odessaonduty1 · 52,949
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 14 September 2026
Повітряна тривога️ | Бережіть себе!
@raketna_neb · 215,789
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 76 here — alongside 75 others — read 11 August 2026
БессарабiЯ.UA
@bessarabia_ua · 26,719
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 14 September 2026
КОРАБЕЛИ
@korabely_media · 156,508
Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 14 August 2026

This channel appears in 24 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“💡Нет света Одесса | Тутешні” (@svitlo_off), 12,227 subscribers as measured 12 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/svitlo_off.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.