请查看以上8月赛季的十二位花魁☝️ 花魁榜采用【静默更新】机制,每月12号统一更新上一赛季榜单。 也就是说,你每个月12号看到的花魁榜,都是全新一届。 最终上榜的12位老师,均由全苏州狼友根据上个月的真实体验与投票结果共同选出,只有获得足够认可,才能进入当月花魁榜。 不靠自荐,不靠关系,每月重选,12位最佳,凭狼友投票上榜。
❤🔥87❤73

Channel
@suzhourere
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry
25,663subscribers
+1,285 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.
| Telegram ID | -1003226850797 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @suzhourere |
| Description | 「苏州热花魁榜」是从已验证老师中,根据狼友真实体验、报告反馈、口碑热度及投票结果综合产生的月度精选榜单。 花魁榜采用静默更新制,每月12号更新上一赛季最终名单。每期仅保留 12位,由苏州狼友真实体验与投票共同选出。 它不是永久榜,也不是交钱就能上的榜,有人气、有报告、有口碑,才能留下。 |
| Created | Between 1 October 2025 and 31 January 2026— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 12 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 17 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/suzhourere |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 17 Aug 2026, 19:18 | 25,663 | +86 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 13:56 | 25,577 | +145 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 19:34 | 25,432 | +197 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 08:48 | 25,235 | +161 |
| 12 Aug 2026, 10:25 | 25,074 | +320 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 12:37 | 24,754 | +81 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 09:30 | 24,673 | +96 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:51 | 24,577 | +96 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:30 | 24,481 | +102 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 03:33 | 24,379 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:30 | 24,378 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 22:26 | 24,378 | first reading |
4 posts held, back to 5 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 4 posts for this entry, the most recent from 10 May 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 18 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
986 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 56.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤🔥 | 559 | 56.7% | |
| ❤ | 424 | 43.0% | |
| 💯 | 2 | 0.203% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 0.101% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 4 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 986reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 4 most recent posts we hold, published 5 April 2026 to 10 May 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
请查看以上8月赛季的十二位花魁☝️ 花魁榜采用【静默更新】机制,每月12号统一更新上一赛季榜单。 也就是说,你每个月12号看到的花魁榜,都是全新一届。 最终上榜的12位老师,均由全苏州狼友根据上个月的真实体验与投票结果共同选出,只有获得足够认可,才能进入当月花魁榜。 不靠自荐,不靠关系,每月重选,12位最佳,凭狼友投票上榜。
❤🔥87❤73
🏆【硬了么花魁榜】 🌺花魁:#陈倩倩 💦费用:700p 1300pp (40分钟/90分钟) 🔎位置:#园区 📞点击获取陈倩倩联系方式 👀查看陈倩倩所有报告 ✍️给陈倩倩写报告 💖点击加入硬了么主群 📝备注:#真实报告 #花魁榜已认证
❤🔥360❤154
🏆【硬了么花魁榜】 🌺花魁:#小如 💦费用:600p 1200pp (45分钟/90分钟) 🔎位置:#吴中区 📞点击获取小如联系方式 👀查看小如所有报告 ✍️给小如写报告 💖点击加入硬了么主群 📝备注:#真实报告 #花魁榜已认证
❤106❤🔥58👏1
🏆【硬了么花魁榜】 🌺花魁:#小腰精 💦费用:600p 1200pp (40分钟/80分钟) 🔎位置:#相城区 📞点击获取小腰精联系方式 👀查看小腰精所有报告 ✍️给小腰精写报告 💖点击加入硬了么主群 📝备注:#真实报告 #花魁榜已认证
❤91❤🔥54💯2
Showing the 4 most recent of 4 posts we hold for @suzhourere. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@suzhourere edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“苏州热花魁榜” (@suzhourere), 25,663 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/suzhourere.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.