Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

@SURXONYPX

@surxonypx

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,198subscribers

-18 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001405667728
TypeChannel
Username@surxonypx
Created3 January 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (TGDataset)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/surxonypx

Growth

5,1905,2165,2036 August 2026 — 5,216 subscribers6 August 2026 — 5,214 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,190 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,198 subscribers5,1986 August 202612 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 6 days, net -18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,186–5,220 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 17:135,198+8
9 Aug 2026, 07:125,190-24
6 Aug 2026, 08:315,214-2
6 Aug 2026, 05:335,216first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 30 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 8 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
48.8%
avg views ÷ 5,198 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,540
15 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.11%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
15
of 15 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 14 of 15 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 10 August 2026
Posts held15 (30 July 202610 August 2026)
Views total38,030
Reactions total38
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken12 Aug 2026, 04:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
29m 06s
Average length
2m 39s

Measured directly from 11 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

38 reactions across 11 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍2257.9%
1642.1%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 38reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 30 July 2026 to 10 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

10 Aug 2026, 20:40 UTC≈2,020 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#munosabat 🌐 Ijtimoiy tarmoqlarda tarqalgan holat yuzasidan MA’LUMOT 2026 yilning 9-avgust kuni Surxondaryo viloyati Angor tumanida 1984-yilda tug`ilgan fuqaro T.U. “Damas” avtomashinasini boshqarib kelib, xizmat olib borayotgan YPX xodimlarini ko‘rgach, harakat yo‘nalishini o‘zgartirib, qochib, shub’hali harakat sodir etgan. O’z o’rnida YPX xodimlari avtomashinani izidan kuzatib borishgan. Ushbu jarayonda haydov

5👍1

10 Aug 2026, 07:03 UTC≈1,950 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#рейд хавфсиз_ва_соғлом_юрт 🚨 Сурхондарё вилоятининг Қумқўрғон туманида ўтказилаётган назорат рейд тадбирлари давомида... 🚛 Юк ташиш қоидаларига амал қилмаган ва бошқа қўпол қоидабузарликларни содир этган ҳайдовчилар аниқланиб қонуний чоралар кўрилди. 📝 Ҳайдовчилик ҳуқуқисиз ва вояга етмаган ҳайдовчилар; 👮‍♀️ИИО ходимининг қонуний талабини бажармаган; ❗️"Қидирувда" бўлган автоуловлар; 🛠 Рухсатсиз қайта жиҳозл

👍31

8 Aug 2026, 07:18 UTC≈1,940 views2 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @tvsurxonVideo

Ta'lim va taraqqiyot: "Xavfsiz maktab hududi" loyihasi doirasida amalga oshirilayotgan ishlar, raqamlashtirish jarayonlari Ijtimoiy tarmoqlar orqali bizni kuzating: ✅ TELEGRAM ✅ YouTube ✅ Instagram ✅ Efirni ko'rish ✅ Web-site ✅ Facebook

2

8 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈2,020 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#рейд хавфсиз_ва_соғлом_юрт 🚨 Қумқўрғон туманида ўтказилаётган назорат рейд тадбирлари жараёни 👉🏻@SURXONYPX

8 Aug 2026, 06:38 UTC≈1,970 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#сайёр_қабул ЙҲХБ бошлиғининг сайёр қабули бўлиб ўтди 📍Узун туманида йўл инфратузиламасини яхшилаш, аҳоли учун хавфсиз ҳаракатланишни ташкил этиш, фуқароларни қийнаб келаётган масалаларга ечим топиш мақсадида Сурхондарё вилояти ИИБ ЖХХ ЙҲХБ бошлиғи иштирокида сайёр қабул ташкил этилди. 🔹Аксар мурожаатлар шу жойнинг ўзида ҳал этилди. 👉🏾 @SURXONYPX

2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 15:52 UTC≈2,120 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @zamon_lavhalarVideo

13:00 07.08.2026 “TARGʻIBOT AVTOKARVONI” TADBIRI OʻTKAZILDI #Surxondaryo muxbir: Bekzod Qodirov https://t.me/zamon_lavhalar

1

4 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC≈2,670 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#қонуний_чора 👮‍♀️Ҳайдовчилик ҳуқуқига эга бўлмаган навбатдаги шахсга чора кўрилди Термиз шаҳрида ЙПХ ходимларининг қонуний тўхташ тўғрисидаги ишорасига амал қилмаган ҳайдовчи ҳали ҳайдовчилик ҳуқуқига эга бўлмагани аниқланди. 👉🏾 @SURXONYPX

👍31

4 Aug 2026, 16:03 UTC≈2,560 views0 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @YHXX_UZVideo

21 нафар боғча боласи билан ЙТҲга учраган ҳайдовчига ҳукм ўқилди ©️ "Sevimli" телеканали "Zamon" информацион дастури 👉 @YHXX_UZ

4 Aug 2026, 15:55 UTC≈3,480 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

#мурожаат 📝 Сурхондарё вилояти ЙҲХБ бошлиғининг сайёр қабули бўлиб ўтади ▪️ 7 Август куни соат 11-00 да Узун тумани "Баҳористон" МФЙ ҳудудида жойлашган Йўл ҳаракати хавфсизлиги биносида ✅Фуқароларни йўл ҳаракати хавфсизлиги соҳасига оид мурожаатлари ва таклифлари билан фаол иштирок этишга таклиф этамиз. ✍️ Сурхондарё вилояти ИИБ ЖХХ ЙҲХБ ахборот хизмати

4 Aug 2026, 12:24 UTC≈1,940 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#рейд хавфсиз_ва_соғлом_юрт 🚨 Термиз шаҳрида ўтказилаётган тунги назорат рейд тадбирлари жараёни 👉🏻@SURXONYPX

👍3

3 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC≈3,070 views4 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#жараён 🚧 ЙТҲ содир бўлиши мумкин бўлган йўл участкаларида ҳаракат хавфсизлигини таьминловчи воситалар ўрнатилмоқда 👉🏾 @SURXONYPX

3👍1

1 Aug 2026, 01:57 UTC≈2,900 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

#рейд 🚶Қоидабузар пиёдаларга чора кўрилди 🚸 Термиз шаҳрида ЙПХ ходимлари томонидан қоидаларни четлаб ўтган пиёдалар аниқланиб уларга нисбатан тегишли чоралар кўрилди. Қоидабузарларга тарғибот-тушунтириш ишлари олиб борилди. 👉🏼t.me/surxonypx

👍3

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @surxonypx. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 171,428 of 1,480,688entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Surxondaryoliklar | Расмий
@SurxondaryoRasmiy · 119,844
Telegram ranks this channel #2 of 50 here — alongside 49 others — read 15 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“@SURXONYPX” (@surxonypx), 5,198 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/surxonypx.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.