5 measurements spanning 7 days, net -2. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,058–2,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
14 Aug 2026, 12:27
2,061
+2
11 Aug 2026, 04:01
2,059
-1
8 Aug 2026, 01:01
2,060
-3
7 Aug 2026, 10:31
2,063
no change
7 Aug 2026, 10:20
2,063
first reading
Engagement
10 posts held, back to 27 September 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
17.7%
avg views ÷ 2,061 subscribers
Avg views / post
364
5 posts measured
Reaction rate
17.8%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
5
of 10 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026
Posts held
10 (27 September 2025 – 7 August 2026)
Views total
1,821
Reactions total
324
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
7 Aug 2026, 17:01 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
52s
Average length
52s
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
774 reactions across 10 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 59.3% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
459
59.3%
🔥
126
16.3%
🤩
41
5.30%
😍
34
4.39%
🍓
30
3.88%
💘
24
3.10%
👍
16
2.07%
🙏
14
1.81%
💔
13
1.68%
👏
10
1.29%
❤🔥
6
0.775%
🥰
1
0.129%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 774reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 27 September 2025 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 10 we hold a reading for · 10%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @survivorsnotes. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 27 September 2025 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
预言 [yùyán] — prophecy | пророчество 🌾
please, I've been on my knees | пожалуйста, я уже столько раз молил, стоя на коленях;
change the prophecy | измените пророчество;
don't want money, just someone who wants my company | мне не нужны деньги, мне просто нужен кто-то, кто захочет быть рядом со мной;
let it once be me | пусть хотя бы раз выберут меня;
who do I have to speak to about if they can redo the prophеcy? | к …
изучаем истории происхождения чэнъюев, чтобы быстрее их запомнить. день #1 ✅
望梅止渴 [wàng méi zhǐ kě] — «утолять жажду, глядя на сливы»;
чэнъюй обязан своим появлением китайскому полководцу Цао Цао (период Троецарствия, III век н.э.).
согласно легенде, однажды Цао Цао повел свое войско в карательный поход против военачальника Чжан Сю. поход выпал на жаркий день, во время которого войско томилось от жажды — солнце в …
кажется, возвращение стоит начать с двух интересных фраз, которые китайцы используют, когда извиняются 🫣
• 大人不记小人过 [dàrén bù jì xiǎorén guò] — большой человек прощает ошибки людей ниже себя. проще говоря, способ искусственно поставить себя ниже собеседника, сказать, что он очень великодушен и мудр, поэтому не будет злиться на вас, такого «маленького человечка»;
• 下不为例 [xià bù wéi lì] — чтобы больше такого не было. …
ну да ладно, шутки в сторону. первый (технически — второй) пост после долгого отсутствия хочется начать цитатой:
“种一棵树最好的时间是十年前, 其次是现在”
«Лучшее время, чтобы посадить дерево, было десять лет назад. Следующий подходящий для этого момент — сейчас».
грузить не буду, просто скажу, что время было и есть непростое. самое что ни на есть выжженное поле, на котором не растут цветы. но если не садить семена, то ничего никогд…
как я упоминала ранее, мне посчастливилось приложить руку к переводу ещё одной книги — артбука китайского диджитал-художника и иллюстратора, работающего в индустрии игр и фэнтези-арта, 666K 信譞 (666Kart) 🩵
и мне бы хотелось поделиться одной очень важной мыслью из его интервью:
我觉得最难的部分是心态上的挑战。因为我们现在的世界充满了社交媒体和快速的信息交换,人们其实被动地在和全世界比较。你会觉得人和人都无时无刻在做着什么事情,你会感到焦虑。
克服这一点焦虑是非常重要的,起初它只是一点点小的心情起伏,时间久了会变成心理问题,影响你的健康和工作。但是我们如…
「有生之年能遇见你,竟花光我所有运气」 [yǒushēngzhīnián néng yùjiàn nǐ, jìng huā guāng wǒ suǒyǒu yùnqì] — «Я исчерпал всю свою удачу, лишь бы получить шанс повстречать в этой жизни тебя» 🩵
art cr: keai_wzx
#выживающий_MDZS
вот вы спросите «ну зачем знать этих апсар? их образ давно канул в Лету»
тем временем золотой логотип Государственного управления по делам радиовещания и телевидения (国家广播电视总局) с фейтянь, который вы видите при просмотре каждого второго фильма и сериала, просто существует 🧚🏼
ещё раз зафиксируем: 飞天 — важный образ в китайской культуре, зачастую связанный с искусством и творчеством (а также небом).
я сейчас смотрю «А…
11 лет официального изучения китайского. бум 🤯
учить китайский я начала за пару лет до этого по самоучителям и пабликам ВК (аналог тгк десятилетней давности), но а) а таком случае сложно рассчитать момент начала обучения и б) очевидно, проку от такого обучения было не особо много.
но вот первое официальное занятие с китайцами на курсах я зафиксировала в одной из своих социальных сетей, это было — обоже — ровно 11 л…
дайджест книг китайских авторов, которые вышли недавно или выйдут вот-вот 📚
угнаться за их количеством в последнее время почти нереально, поэтому здесь только то, что мне самой хотелось бы прочитать.
• «Немая улика» Цинь Мин, уже купила и поставила первой в свой книжный список на ближайшее время. мои ожидания высоки;
• «Ворон» Мо Фэй, маньхуа;
• «О муравьях и динозаврах» Лю Цысинь;
• «Медные монеты» Му Сули, 2 т…
❤38🔥8👍4🍓3
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @survivorsnotes. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“записки выживающего | 這裡不禁你 🕊️” (@survivorsnotes), 2,061 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/survivorsnotes.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.