Бывает ли дружба с бывшими?
- Конечно да0%
- Категорично нет0%
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Channel
@surveyscf
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
28subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 9 November 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1004349555589 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @surveyscf |
| Description | Канал для тех, кому всё интересно. Бот @survey_cf_bot Автор оформы @boolProptestingCheatsEnabledtrue |
| First recorded | 9 November 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 9 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/surveyscf |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Nov 2026, 18:22 | 28 | no change |
| 9 Nov 2026, 17:47 | 28 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 6 November 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 9 November 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (6 November 2026 – 9 November 2026) |
| Views total | 166 |
| Reactions total | — |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 9 Nov 2026, 18:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 20 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
Бывает ли дружба с бывшими?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
😂🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤😂🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤 ➖➖➖➖➖➖➖➖ 😂😂😂🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷🕷 😰 u like some pairings in brawl stars, but no one understands u? 👍 u'r welcome! @bspairingsconf @bspairingsconf @bspairingsconf @bspairingsconf @bspairingsconf @bspairingsconf admins:: ❤️ owner ❤️/🕷 co-owner 🎠 mp-adm (( laki lalo ))
🧩꒰๓... 𝚠𝚎𝚕𝚌𝚘𝚖𝚎 𝚝𝚘 entropy duo confession ꪆৎ♟ здесь публикуется ежедневный контент по дуо / пейрингу wyll_ & mugm 𑄹 · ─ navigation 𑄹 · ─ mp 𑄹 · admsearch 𑄹 · ─ boost cr: @27yen_
. ๋ W𝘦𝘭𝘤𝘰𝘮𝘦 to U𝘯𝘴𝘦𝘳𝘪𝘰𝘶𝘴 S𝘮𝘱 C𝘰𝘯𝘧𝘦𝘴𝘴𝘪𝘰𝘯 ! 𐌵ᥒsᥱri᧐ᥙs sⲙρ — ϶ᴛ᧐ ᥴᥱρᥙя ʙᥙдᥱ᧐ρ᧐᧘ᥙκ᧐ʙ,ᥴ᧐ᤋдᥲннᥲя ⲙᥲᥔнκρᥲɸᴛ юᴛуδᥱρ᧐ⲙ ɗi᥎_y navigation ੭੭ mp post ( 0+ !! ) ੭੭ adm search ੭੭ boost ੭੭ cr: ccandlee1111208
СРОЧНЫЙ НАБОР В АДМИНЫ🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ Искал множество разнообразных вп?🌟 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ У тебя только создан канал, и везде отказывают в вп?🌟 Тогда тебе к нам! Здесь вы найдёте... Вп 0+❤️ Платный пиар🎁Пиар рублями Набор в админы 🐈⬛ Множество вп 🔠дём вас!🐸 😄|Навигация|
ЗВЕЗДЫ ЗА АКТИВ??! 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 конфешен 👫 « 🥸 нарисовал арт по есенину/маяковскому, куда скинуть?? » 🤩 🥹 « 😉очему все молчат про платоническую связь этих персонажей руслита?!! »🥹 « 😃оже, этот фанфик по раскольникову/разумихину разбивает мне сердце... » 💔 🗿🗿🗿🤩накомо? 🗿🗿🗿В « руслит 🗿🗿🗿 пейринги кф » ты можешь поделиться любовью, ассоциациями, размышлениями и творчеством с любым пейрингом из руслита! 🥹🥹нав…
🌟 🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🔠 🔤очешь поделиться своей историей про отношения? ✨✨😀😀✨🔤огда тебе к нам! 😀 🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🔠🔠 😀😀😀 😀︩ꫀׄׄ᥊͜ ᥴִꪮִռִׄƒִ︩︪ꫀׄssׄꪱᜒִꪮִռִׄ МЫ ИЩЕМ ПРЕКРАСНЫХ АДМИНОВ! 😀😀🔤лина меня бросила, обидела меня 😠 🔤 мы с моим бывшим в хороших отношениях 😀😀🔤 вот мы с моим недавно сошлись, очень рада 🤩 Был рейд с 46 до 14 подписчиков 😀 канал | бот | вп | поиск адм 😀 ⭐️🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟
!!!НАБОР В АДМИНЫ!!! ▫️▫️ 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 𝘁𝗼 𝗜𝗠𝗣𝗘𝗥𝗜𝗔𝗟 𝗙𝗜𝗥𝗘 𝗗𝗗𝗨𝗢 𝗰𝗳 𝗻𝗱 𝗱𝗮𝗶𝗹𝘆 !! ищешь место где ежедневно будет публиковать свежий контент по империал файр дуо? хочешь поделиться своим творчеством по ним? 🥹 @impfireduo ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🥹mp post 🥹 admins - takebot | boost🥩🥩 🥩 ❤️🩹❤️🩹🥩🤩 DNI :: base, boundaries breakers, wemmbu haters, flamefrags haters, imperial fire duo haters ,,!💥
[ОТКРЫТЫЙ НАБОР В АДМИНЫ] 🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫🌫 ◦❧◦°˚°◦.¸¸◦´°◦¸¸.◦°˚°◦☙◦◦❧◦°˚°◦.¸¸◦´´°◦¸¸.◦°˚°◦☙◦ [💫]- Здравствуй спутник... ⭐ - Желаешь найти новый проект, где множество ролей? Добро пожаловать в [приключения бездны]🌒 [🦋]-Мы рады любым участникам, у нас много свободных ролей, а также нам требуются впшеры, программисты и многие другие!😆 [🌧] - Речь идет не только о куче ролей, но и об открытом наборе! Нам очень нужн…
꒰ 🕶 ꒱ 😁😄🍉₊ 𓂃。🎧 🤩🤩Это что, блог САМОГО КРУТОГО диджея Блавиалы — ♾️♾️♾️♾️♾️??? ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩🤩Скорее зацените! 🌀
ㅤ៸៸ㅤ 💚🌟🌟🌟🌟🌟 🌟🌟💚 ㅤ 🤩 ➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿➿ 🤩 ㅤࣲ Искал кф по Кайманам, но нашел только заброшенные кф? 💔 ㅤࣲ Хочешь поделится своим творчеством по этим двоим, но не знаешь с кем? 🥰 ㅤࣲ Или твои родители отказались от тебя из за твоей любви к Кайманятам? 😫 ៸៸ Знакомо? ТОГДА ТЕБЕ СЮДА! 💚 🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩🤩 🅰️ chat 🅰️ tags 🅰️ mp post 🅰️ rules 🅰️ admins
😅😌😁🥹😀 ♡̶ 😛😂😉🥲😚🥰😀 輝 𝄄 😇😇 😘😍☺️😗 ۫۫🎁⏝ ❩❩֕ ㅤ ۫۫ㅤ ☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️☁️ ۫ . ꒰꒰ 𐓣᳟ 𐑼֔⸼ ۪֠ ⲕⲁⲏⲁⲗ, ⲃ ⲕⲟⲧⲟⲣⲟⲙ ⲧы ⲙⲟⲯⲉⲱь ⲩⲃυⲇⲉⲧь ⲭⲉⲏⲧⲁύ ⲏⲁ ⲗюⳝⲟύ ⲃⲕⲩⲥ! 🎀🎀ПЕРЕХОДНИК ᛝ ВП ПОСТ ۫ . 🎀 . . ֹ︵ֺ᷼ ׂ ∙ ᶻ 𝗓 𐰁 . •
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @surveyscf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Бывает ли дружба с бывшими?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Оцените свой уровень раздражительности
Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Хотите иногда видеть в канале викторины?
Shares as published, totalling 101%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 6 November 2026 to 9 November 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ОПРОСЫ КФ | SURVEYS CONFESSION” (@surveyscf), 28 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/surveyscf.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.