Channel
@surfing_ru
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry
1,576subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001496319408 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @surfing_ru |
| Created | Between 1 May 2019 and 30 September 2021— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 14 August 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 14 August 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/surfing_ru |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 14 Aug 2026, 00:48 | 1,576 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 12:14 | 1,575 | +1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:30 | 1,574 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 07:18 | 1,574 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 19 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 7 August 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 20 (31 July 2026 – 7 August 2026) |
| Views total | 5,296 |
| Reactions total | 61 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 7 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
61 reactions across 13 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 52.5% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| custom 5427203254561810342 | 32 | 52.5% | |
| 🔥 | 15 | 24.6% | |
| custom 5199617979838377043 | 7 | 11.5% | |
| custom 5425002478959603554 | 6 | 9.84% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 1.64% |
Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 13 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 61reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @surfing_ru. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 7 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Робот для поиска белых акул может остаться без лаборатории Лаборатория Shark Lab из Лонг-Бич спустила на воду жёлтое надводное судно Shark Surveillance Bot длиной около трёх метров за $300 000. Оно работает на солнечных батареях, может патрулировать пляж до недели и передаёт данные спасателям по Wi-Fi. Ходит оно челноком вдоль берега. Сейчас на борту гидроакустические приёмники и камеры. Сборщик ДНК из воды и площад…
Всероссийские соревнования по шортборду в Петербурге перенесли на 7 августа Всероссийские соревнования по шортборду на пляже «Ласковый» в посёлке Солнечное состоятся сегодня, 7 августа. Изначально турнир планировали провести в июле, но прогноз не подтвердился. Старт назначали на 29 июля и отменили уже на следующий день. Новая дата вышла за пределы официального регламента, утверждённого президентом Российской федераци…
Надя Эростарбе сама оплачивает сезон в топ-10 мирового тура Баскская сёрферша идёт десятой в мировом рейтинге WSL и катается на досках DHD, но контракта с крупным брендом у неё нет с самого детства. Расходы на сезон Надя закрывает призовыми, а билеты между этапами выбирает по цене самостоятельно. В тур она отобралась через Челленджер-серию, выиграв Ballito Pro в ЮАР. За сезон Эростарбе обыграла олимпийскую чемпионку…
Сёрферы прервали сессию из-за крокодила Сёрф-тренер Джейкоб Меллиш выложил короткое вертикальное видео из лайнапа на юге Шри-Ланки: сёрферы замечают плывущего через волны крокодила и сразу гребут к лодке. Ролик набрал 72 000 лайков, но сёрф-медиа заметили его только спустя восемь с половиной месяцев. Самым странным в записи оказался финал. В кадре с подписью «Обычный день на Шри-Ланке» крокодила грузят в кузов пикап…
custom 51996179798383770432
Камчатка вошла в число лучших экспедиций Бена Уайленда Режиссёр холодноводных сёрф-фильмов Бен Уайленд признался, что за всю карьеру больше всего ему запомнились две поездки — на Камчатку в 2012 году и на Алеутские острова. К Алеутам он вернулся и в последнем своём фильме The Search for Volcano Island, где команда искала волну под вулканом. Путь Уайленда начался в 2009 году с блога Arctic Surf. Вскоре его заметил фо…
custom 54272032545618103425
Джастин Спенсер снял сессию без героев Австралийский видеограф выложил ролик с жёсткой сессии, где океан в основном берёт верх над сёрферами, а удачные проезды единичны и похожи на чудо. В видео не назван ни один сёрфер, а место съёмки не раскрыто — в служебных тегах ролика стоят только два слова, East Coast и Sydney. Британский журнал Carve отнёс свелл к тем, что раздают не волны, а удары, и похвалил оператора за о…
🔥2
Джордж Оруэлл едва не утонул в водовороте Корриврекан YouTube-канал Untouched Fishing опубликовал съёмку из лодки в шотландском проливе Корриврекан. Между островами Джура и Скарба приливное течение разгоняется до 8,5 узла, то есть до 16 км/ч, проваливается во впадину и бьёт в атлантический свелл. Автор ролика называет его третьим по величине водоворотом в мире, но гидрографы таких рейтингов не публикуют: норвежский С…
🔥3
Rip Curl Cup Padang Padang ждёт свелла, а отбор могут провести уже в пятницу Главный контест Индонезии перешёл в режим ожидания: в понедельник 10 августа к Бали подойдёт граундсвелл, который во вторник поднимет волны больше чем в два роста. Окно открыто весь август, а у участников есть 48 часов, чтобы прилететь на остров. Организаторы рассчитывают запустить главный день уже на следующей неделе. Турнир в 23-й раз про…
custom 54272032545618103427
Два сёрфера собрали настенный экран с прогнозом волн, чтобы реже брать телефон Флориан Майер и Томми Инкен, оба сёрферы с маленькими детьми, устали лазить в телефон за прогнозом и собрали Swellframe — 7,5-дюймовый экран на электронных чернилах в деревянной рамке. Для промо они сняли ролик с влогером Беном Грейви, где главным антигероем сделали смартфон, а кампания на Kickstarter собрала больше заявленной суммы. Заказ…
🔥3custom 54250024789596035542
Матахи Дролле больше боится грести, чем разгоняться на буксире Таитянский бигвейв-сёрфер разобрал в новом ролике августовский свелл 2025 года на Теахупоо, который он проехал на буксире за джет-ски старшего брата Маноа. Матахи взял тогда около десяти волн и закончил без травм, хотя на первой же попал в жёсткий вайпаут. «Я был в трубе и помню, как видел над головой все лодки, которые рвались уйти от волны. А когда мин…
custom 54250024789596035542
Двух метров хватило, чтобы Снэппер Рокс превратился в хаос Бывший профессиональный сёрфер Джеймс Вудс выложил почти девятиминутный ролик с зимней сессии на Голд-Косте, где самый вылизанный и предсказуемый поинтбрейк Австралии стал похож на полосу препятствий. Вода отражалась от скалистого мыса и шла навстречу заходящим трубам. Дело было не в размере. Свелл был скромный, два метра с периодом в десять секунд. На Снэп…
custom 54272032545618103425
Келли Слейтер выложил фото с трёхмесячной дочерью 11-кратный чемпион мира опубликовал в Instagram серию снимков с дочерью, которую до этого не показывали ни разу. Из подписи следует, что девочка родилась около трёх месяцев назад: «Ищем баланс с нашим пополнением. Три месяца Азуми Мун вместе с братом Тао». Лица ребёнка на кадрах нет, и для 54-летнего Слейтера с его партнёршей Калани Миллер такая скрытность — привычно…
custom 54272032545618103427
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @surfing_ru. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Citation-graph rank — 288,737 of 1,350,102entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
@surfing_ru named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сёрфинг” (@surfing_ru), 1,576 subscribers as measured 14 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/surfing_ru.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.