Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜’

@surething17

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

99subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 11 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002466785679
TypeChannel
Username@surething17
Created4 February 2025measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/surething17

Growth

9910099.511 Aug 2026, 11:49 — 100 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 12:01 — 100 subscribers12 Aug 2026, 06:47 — 99 subscribers11 Aug 2026, 11:4912 Aug 2026, 06:47
3 measurements taken within a single day, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 99–100 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 06:4799-1
11 Aug 2026, 12:01100no change
11 Aug 2026, 11:49100first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 4 February 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
4m 53s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 9 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

1,320 reactions across 9 posts, in 31 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 542472236978249973417213.0%
custom 532327888867821073916312.3%
custom 542495364947642443915912.0%
💘14911.3%
❤‍🔥916.89%
custom 5335039724610414766886.67%
🐳483.64%
custom 5334623168617274267463.48%
custom 5411567902862102404463.48%
💅342.58%
custom 5425011438261391207332.50%
custom 5298786150478011313312.35%
custom 5454357876053138877312.35%
💋282.12%
custom 5323445048077994745201.52%
custom 5413352204075558864201.52%
custom 5461066739523544307181.36%
🆒181.36%
😍181.36%
custom 5334769137375796990171.29%
11 further kinds906.82%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 9 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,320reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2025 to 29 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
72
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 9 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
18
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @surething17. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 4 February 2025 to 29 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Oct 2025, 16:45 UTC≈2,170 views136 reactions14 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 542495364947642443966custom 542472236978249973417custom 542501143826139120715custom 53234450480779947457custom 53346231686172742677custom 54133522040755588647custom 52987861504780113136custom 53350397246104147666

10 Aug 2025, 17:39 UTC≈2,610 views160 reactions10 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 542495364947642443977custom 533462316861727426722custom 542501143826139120713custom 542472236978249973410custom 53234450480779947457custom 53347691373757969907custom 54133522040755588647custom 53350397246104147666

16 Jul 2025, 02:29 UTC≈2,280 views153 reactions7 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 533503972461041476676custom 529878615047801131320custom 533462316861727426717custom 53234450480779947456custom 54133522040755588646custom 54247223697824997346custom 54249536494764244396custom 54610667395235443076

22 May 2025, 18:07 UTC≈2,390 views153 reactions18 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 532327888867821073978custom 545435787605313887724custom 541156790286210240417custom 54247223697824997348custom 53346191485278900937custom 54610667395235443077custom 53305108190357268566custom 54249536494764244396

2 May 2025, 01:06 UTC≈2,230 views152 reactions7 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 532327888867821073976custom 541156790286210240420custom 542472236978249973419custom 54543578760531388777custom 53349564537844795526custom 54247357099509220916custom 53346191485278900935custom 54610667395235443075

25 Apr 2025, 20:48 UTC≈1,770 views149 reactions4 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

❤️‍🩹

❤‍🔥80custom 542472236978249973421💋14💅6💘65🐳5💯5

14 Apr 2025, 00:00 UTC≈1,870 views146 reactions4 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

custom 542472236978249973476🐳21😍14👻5💅5💘5😈5🆒5

15 Mar 2025, 01:53 UTC≈1,510 views145 reactions4 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💘72🐳17💋10custom 542472236978249973486❤‍🔥6💅6💔6

5 Feb 2025, 08:57 UTC≈1,080 views126 reactions4 Starsread 11 August 2026
Video

🖤

💘66💅17🔥11custom 54247223697824997347❤‍🔥5🐳5🆒5custom 53232788886782107394

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @surething17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 920,662 of 1,160,990entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝙨𝙪𝙧𝙚 𝙩𝙝𝙞𝙣𝙜’” (@surething17), 99 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/surething17.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.