Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for SUPERSONIC NOODLES

Channel

SUPERSONIC NOODLES

@supersonicnoodles

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

403subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002247247071
TypeChannel
Username@supersonicnoodles
CreatedBetween 1 May 2024 and 31 October 2024— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/supersonicnoodles

Growth

39940340110 August 2026 — 399 subscribers10 August 2026 — 399 subscribers17 August 2026 — 403 subscribers10 August 202617 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 7 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 398–404 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Aug 2026, 13:27403+4
10 Aug 2026, 08:00399no change
10 Aug 2026, 07:46399first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 3 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 29 June 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 23s
Average length
48s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

187 reactions across 14 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 28.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 52109563069527589105328.3%
custom 53324259621328774063418.2%
custom 54090154725175538022714.4%
custom 53323275386623225482111.2%
custom 5364098734600762220179.09%
custom 5332433525570286158158.02%
custom 5332479632044209911115.88%
custom 533282284288083299894.81%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them areTelegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 187reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 3 June 2026 to 29 June 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
62
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 17 we hold a reading for · 18%
Most on one post
32
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @supersonicnoodles. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 18 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 3 June 2026 to 29 June 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

29 Jun 2026, 21:06 UTC301 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video

WHOOOOOPS! He did it again! Завтра вас ждет лютый спэшл! 30.06.26

custom 52109563069527589106custom 54090154725175538023custom 53324259621328774062custom 53323275386623225481custom 53324335255702861581custom 53640987346007622201

15 Jun 2026, 01:32 UTC503 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 521095630695275891011custom 53323275386623225482

12 Jun 2026, 08:57 UTC484 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

custom 540901547251755380213

11 Jun 2026, 22:21 UTC489 views13 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Очень похоже на то, что мы готовы

custom 54090154725175538025custom 52109563069527589104custom 53640987346007622204

11 Jun 2026, 08:24 UTC457 views14 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Есть вайб, что сетов больше нет…

custom 52109563069527589106custom 53324259621328774062custom 53324796320442099112custom 53328228428808329982custom 53323275386623225481custom 53324335255702861581

11 Jun 2026, 08:04 UTC410 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🚨1 ДЕНЬ 🚨

custom 53324259621328774063custom 53323275386623225482custom 53324335255702861581custom 53324796320442099111custom 53328228428808329981

9 Jun 2026, 13:17 UTC450 views6 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

🚨🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠🔠 🚨 Этот город погряз в грехах… Ну а мы че, а мы придем все на батл в стиле ГОРОД ГРЕХОВ! Черный-белый-красный! Обязательное наличие красного акцента (аксессуары, галстуки, брошки, помада)! Ярко-ярко-красный! Строгий вид, костюмы или кожанки, ну и конечно же безумные прически! В этот раз будет конкурс за самую интересную прическу! (Джентельмены, начес, как у Джони Браво уже занят) LET’S GO!

custom 54090154725175538024custom 53323275386623225481custom 53324259621328774061

9 Jun 2026, 11:30 UTC355 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🚨 БОЛЬШЕ ПОЛОВИНЫ ПРОДАНО🚨

custom 53640987346007622207

9 Jun 2026, 09:41 UTC367 views3 reactionsread 10 August 2026

🚨 12 часов до повышения цены 🚨

custom 52109563069527589103

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @supersonicnoodles. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 660,880 of 1,481,306entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“SUPERSONIC NOODLES” (@supersonicnoodles), 403 subscribers as measured 17 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/supersonicnoodles.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.