Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подслушано Supercell

Channel

Подслушано Supercell

@supercellin

On this record: Topic · Observations · Channels linked by matching posts · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

4,996subscribers

-490 since we began measuring on 9 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001985045124
TypeChannel
Username@supercellin
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/supercellin

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 13 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Observations

These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.

Content that also appears on other registered channels

Posts published here appear in near-verbatim form on 5 other registered channels. This entry also sits inside a group of 29 channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group; two members of the group may share no posts with each other. The matching is on the text itself, not on Telegram’s forward marker, so it finds a copy whether or not it was labelled as one.

Matching posts — open both and compare (6 of the pairs behind the counts below)
Posted firstThenOverlapGap
@supercellin/4157 · this entry4 Aug 2026, 16:47 UTC@BrawlStAngel/68396 Aug 2026, 14:03 UTC1.0045 hours
@supercellin/4163 · this entry6 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC@BrawlStAngel/68447 Aug 2026, 12:03 UTC1.0017 hours
@supercellin/4167 · this entry8 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC@BrawlStAngel/68588 Aug 2026, 20:20 UTC1.0010 hours
@supercellin/4159 · this entry5 Aug 2026, 17:44 UTC@BrawlStAngel/68679 Aug 2026, 18:03 UTC1.004 days
@supercellin/4169 · this entry9 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC@BrawlStAngel/687310 Aug 2026, 14:04 UTC1.0021 hours
@supercellin/4171 · this entry10 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC@BrawlStAngel/688211 Aug 2026, 18:00 UTC1.0025 hours
Channels this entry shares post bodies with, where at least one matching post pair has no forward credit between the two channels, or to a common source, recorded in our data
ChannelMatching postsText overlapTypical gapPublished first
@BrawlStAngel6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.0021 hoursthis entry (6–0)
@BrawlStarsLives6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.004.3 hours@BrawlStarsLives (6–0)
@brawlik_oreo6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 daysthis entry (6–0)
@brawlite6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 daysthis entry (6–0)
@sup_tv6 (6/6 hand-verifiable sample passed)1.003 daysthis entry (6–0)

Text overlap is the Jaccard coefficient over the set of distinct three-word phrases in the two bodies: 1.00 is identical wording, and the threshold for counting a pair at all is 0.70. Candidates are generated by simhash LSH (4 x 16-bit bands, exact Hamming <= 3) verified against the bodies with Jaccard over the SET of distinct 3-word shingles. Published first counts which side of each matching pair carries the earlier timestamp — in this corpus, which is the limitation directly below.

What this cannot establish

MEASURED, DOMINANT ERROR SOURCE: a post ingested before 2026-08-06 may have carried a forward header that was not recorded. A 45-pair hand-check against live t.me pages found 14 (31%) where the live page shows a forward header naming the other channel and the database has none, plus 4 more (9%) naming a third party. The text match itself was wrong 0 times out of 45. Read attribution_capture.items_in_trusted_window before treating the unattributed count as a claim.

Telegram lets a channel forward a post with a header naming the source, and we only began reliably recording that header on 2026-08-06. 5 of the 6 matches recorded here fall after that date and carried no header when we read them. The rest predate reliable capture and are not evidence either way.

“Published first” means first in this corpus. We hold 18 comparable posts for this entry, running 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. A channel we have read one page deep will look younger than a neighbour we have read in full, and the order would flip with no change in the underlying facts.

The detector’s own notes on this observation, as it recorded them. Names in this_style are fields of the underlying evidence record, which the plain-English paragraphs above read out for this entry.

  • Verbatim republication has three causes and the text separates only two: a clone/mirror, unattributed copy-paste, or BOTH channels copying a common third source that neither attributes. The spread filter (content held by at most 8 channels) reduces the third and does not remove it.
  • 'Earliest' means earliest IN THIS CORPUS. A channel ingested one page deep will look younger than a neighbour ingested in full; corpus_coverage above is there to be checked before the direction is believed.
  • shared_verified_est extrapolates the sampled pass rate over the full narrow match count; sampled/passed are the numbers actually measured.
  • Absence of a forward header is not proof of intent: Telegram lets a channel disable forward attribution, and a credit written in the body is not parsed as attribution here (mention_edge_either_way above is the closest available signal).

Of the group of 29 channels, the one whose matching posts we hold earliest is @mirbrawls. That channel is not among the channels listed above, so this entry may share no posts with it and this does not say where this entry’s content came from. It is a statement about our reading window, not a claim of authorship.

Recorded under the keys clone_copy · clone_source, last confirmed 11 November 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.

Channels linked by matching posts

This channel is in a group of 29 registered channels linked by matching posts, directly or through other channels in the group. This channel may share no posts with some of the channels listed below, and listed channels may share none with each other. Links are found by comparing text fingerprints across every channel on the register.

Which channel, if either, published first is deliberately not shown in this list. “First” could only mean first in our own crawl, which depends on how deep we happened to reach into each channel’s history, not on when the content was actually first posted. Our one hand-check read 45 of the highest-confidence flagged pairs against the live Telegram pages. In 18 of them the live page showed a “Forwarded from” credit that our database had no record of, so reading that pair as an unattributed copy was wrong; the check did not measure who published first. This list is ordered by subscriber count, the same as every other listing on this site, never by which channel we think came first. Near-verbatim matching has several ordinary explanations besides copying — a channel mirroring itself, an unattributed repost, or two channels independently repeating the same wire story — and this measurement cannot tell those apart. How this is measured.

Brawl Stars Live
@BrawlStarsLives · Channel
171,584 subscribers
Бравл Старс
@brawIstarsikk · Channel
110,286 subscribers
Brawl Stars Land
@brawls_land · Channel
97,230 subscribers
Brawl Stars Lead
@brawl_lead · Channel
90,464 subscribers
Brawl Stars
@MyBrawlStarsRU · Channel
81,281 subscribers
Brawl Stars News
@brawls_play · Channel
70,309 subscribers
Brawl Stars | Бравл Старс Новости
@brawlstars_skachat · Channel
61,663 subscribers
Мир Brawl Stars
@mirbrawls · Channel
42,701 subscribers
Garga🚀 | Бравл Старс
@BrawlStarsGarga · Channel
27,478 subscribers
BOOM | БРАВЛ СТАРС
@bubsyt · Channel
25,942 subscribers
about Brawl Stars
@brawlstars_about · Channel
24,490 subscribers
Mercy Brawl Stars
@mercybrawlnews · Channel
24,050 subscribers
Brawl Stars Lite
@brawlite · Channel
19,919 subscribers
Supercell Studio
@supercell_studio · Channel
19,417 subscribers
Brawl Stars VIP
@brawlikstars_news · Channel
19,197 subscribers
Supercell Journal
@supercell_journal · Channel
17,960 subscribers
Brawl Oreo
@brawlik_oreo · Channel
16,068 subscribers
Supercell TV
@sup_tv · Channel
11,590 subscribers
BRAWL STARS MEDIA
@brawls_tg · Channel
9,767 subscribers
Brawl Stars Today
@todaybrawl · Channel
8,797 subscribers
Не Brawl Stars
@nobrawls · Channel
7,553 subscribers
Рифмы и Бравлы 👑
@bsrhymes · Channel
7,390 subscribers
Hiko News
@hikonews · Channel
6,442 subscribers
ANGEL BRAWL😇
@BrawlStAngel · Channel
6,021 subscribers
Brawl Stars Tg
@brawlstarstggg · Channel
5,579 subscribers
хата дайфера
@newdaiferr · Channel
3,301 subscribers
Brawl Farm
@cryptofarm777228 · Channel
523 subscribers
Blox Fruits • Новости
@NewsBFD · Channel
425 subscribers

Growth

4,9965,4865,2419 August 2026 — 5,486 subscribers9 August 2026 — 5,486 subscribers12 August 2026 — 5,465 subscribers15 August 2026 — 5,444 subscribers18 August 2026 — 5,426 subscribers21 August 2026 — 5,411 subscribers25 August 2026 — 5,393 subscribers28 August 2026 — 5,375 subscribers31 August 2026 — 5,360 subscribers4 September 2026 — 5,338 subscribers9 September 2026 — 5,310 subscribers12 September 2026 — 5,292 subscribers16 September 2026 — 5,262 subscribers30 September 2026 — 5,193 subscribers7 October 2026 — 5,160 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,130 subscribers16 October 2026 — 5,117 subscribers19 October 2026 — 5,095 subscribers22 October 2026 — 5,079 subscribers25 October 2026 — 5,065 subscribers28 October 2026 — 5,050 subscribers31 October 2026 — 5,040 subscribers3 November 2026 — 5,024 subscribers6 November 2026 — 5,010 subscribers9 November 2026 — 4,996 subscribers9 August 20269 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 92 days, net -490. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 4,923–5,560 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 01:094,996-14
6 Nov 2026, 03:085,010-14
3 Nov 2026, 07:165,024-16
31 Oct 2026, 01:595,040-10
28 Oct 2026, 12:315,050-15
25 Oct 2026, 13:275,065-14
22 Oct 2026, 20:425,079-16
19 Oct 2026, 16:005,095-22
16 Oct 2026, 07:375,117-13
13 Oct 2026, 15:205,130-30
7 Oct 2026, 11:565,160-33
30 Sept 2026, 14:375,193-69
16 Sept 2026, 00:595,262-30
12 Sept 2026, 17:585,292-18
9 Sept 2026, 04:155,310-28
4 Sept 2026, 02:205,338-22
31 Aug 2026, 07:075,360-15
28 Aug 2026, 04:125,375-18
25 Aug 2026, 01:185,393-18
21 Aug 2026, 16:185,411first reading

Engagement

23 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
39s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤969.2%
👍215.4%
🔥215.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 13 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 16:15 UTC66 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Забираем скин Золотой Даг, который выдавался в качестве награды за ивент, пробыл в магазине почти год. ⭐️Если вы его не забрали, у вас есть ещё сутки, после чего он навсегда пропадет с магазина.

❤1

11 Aug 2026, 09:22 UTC111 views5 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Самая сложная загадка в Brawl Stars за всю историю: попробуйте угадать бойцов по их пиксельным пинам: ❤️- если угадали всех(это невозможно)

❤5

10 Aug 2026, 17:13 UTC109 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Халявна В Supercell Store можно получить бесплатный хаосдроп для Brawl Stars. ⭐️Награда пробудет на сайте сутки, забираем.

10 Aug 2026, 09:16 UTC117 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Слив нового следующего обновления:

9 Aug 2026, 16:49 UTC121 views1 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Мировой рекорд Guille поделился своим достижением, он стал топ-1 мира по общим кубкам в Brawl Stars. Можно и на заслуженный отдых.

❤1

9 Aug 2026, 10:21 UTC117 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ СЕЙЧАС ОНИ САМЫЕ ЛУЧШИЕ! ❔Что думаете?

8 Aug 2026, 10:07 UTC132 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡️ Дроп слегка поменялся Если вы ещё откуда-то получите нанодропы, то теперь с них будут падать слияния. ❔А можно было сделать так с начала события?

7 Aug 2026, 16:01 UTC136 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Новый рекорд от Кубика Кубик достиг 7 Pro-рангов за сезон в Brawl Stars. Это является абсолютным рекордом, поздравляем с достижением.

7 Aug 2026, 09:15 UTC121 viewsread 12 August 2026
Video

⚡️ Комьюнити игры уже бьются в истерике...

7 Aug 2026, 08:33 UTC113 views3 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Forwarded from @supercell_donationsPhoto

😄Новые выгодные акции в BS: 💎90 гемов — 149₽ 🪩4000 блингов — 149₽ 🔰 Возвращение акций с золотом в SC Store для CR! 🐸500.000 — 599₽ 🐸200.000 — 249₽ 🛍Обе акции сразу (500к+200к) — 848 799₽ 🛍За покупками в лс @menalite

❤1👍1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 19:14 UTC119 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️ Компенсация все же будет Разрабы Brawl Stars сообщили, что все игроки, которые не получали слияния с смузи-дропов, получат компенсацию. Им выдадут столько дропов, сколько они открыли до перерыва. Компенсация будет выдана в течение ближайших нескольких дней, ожидаем.

6 Aug 2026, 09:03 UTC112 viewsread 12 August 2026
Photo

⚡️Это ситуацию не пережить

Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @supercellin. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Supercell Studio
@supercell_studio · 19,417
Telegram ranks this channel #29 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 27 September 2026
Brawl Stars Lite
@brawlite · 19,919
Telegram ranks this channel #36 of 67 here — alongside 66 others — read 24 September 2026
Mercy Brawl Stars
@mercybrawlnews · 24,050
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 14 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подслушано Supercell” (@supercellin), 4,996 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/supercellin.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.