Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Super Recognizer

Channel

Super Recognizer

@super_rec

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

820subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001267099675
TypeChannel
Username@super_rec
Created8 December 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live20 August 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 20 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/super_rec

Growth

8208228216 August 2026 — 821 subscribers6 August 2026 — 821 subscribers13 August 2026 — 822 subscribers20 August 2026 — 820 subscribers6 August 202620 August 2026
4 measurements spanning 14 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 820–822 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
20 Aug 2026, 19:27820-2
13 Aug 2026, 12:08822+1
6 Aug 2026, 15:19821no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:41821first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 4 February 2024the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 September 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

144 reactions across 12 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 69.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍10069.4%
3121.5%
😁85.56%
🐳32.08%
10.694%
🥴10.694%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 144reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 4 February 2024 to 12 September 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

12 Sept 2025, 21:35 UTC628 viewsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Netter Versuch aber nein. Ist er nicht. Mal ehrlich, für wie bescheuert halten die uns eigentlich? Rechts die 2 ja aber der Linke 😂

14 Jul 2025, 08:29 UTC908 views7 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

Verwandte oder Brüder im Geiste? 😂😂😂

🐳321🥴1

13 Jun 2025, 08:13 UTC≈1,300 views4 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

🧠 Gesichterfluch oder Superkraft? Es gibt sie wirklich, Menschen mit einer Fähigkeit, die noch kein Labor entschlüsselt und keine Pharmafirma in Pillenform gepresst hat. Die Superhelden unter uns erkennen Gesichter. Beim ersten Wiedersehen... BÄM!💥 Ein überwältigendes Gefühl durchzuckt dich, du weißt, woher du dieses Gesicht kennst. Immer und immer wieder. So präzise, so tief eingebrannt, dass es fast schon belasten

4

11 Jun 2025, 06:44 UTC≈1,930 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Täuschend echt: So erkennst du KI-generierte Bilder Wer in letzter Zeit nicht auf ein KI-generiertes Bild oder Video hereingefallen ist, war vermutlich in Einzelhaft ohne Internetanschluss. Die Ergebnisse aktueller KI-Systeme wie Midjourney, DALL·E oder Stable Diffusion wirken oft verblüffend realistisch und genau das macht sie so gefährlich. Doch noch gibt es Schwachstellen, an denen sich künstlich erzeugte Bilder

14👍8

10 Jun 2025, 16:06 UTC596 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Wie viele Punkte braucht es, damit ein Gesicht vertraut wirkt? Das hängt davon ab, wer oder was hinschaut, Mensch oder Maschine. Hier ein Überblick: Menschliches Auge: 10–30 Punkte – reichen für subjektive Ähnlichkeit Standard-KI (z. B. dlib): 68 Punkte – für Gesichtserkennung und Mimik 3D-KI-Systeme: 100–500 Punkte – für hochpräzise Ähnlichkeitsvergleiche Google Face Mesh: 468 Punkte – für Echtzeit-Tracking in A

👍5

14 May 2025, 09:19 UTC921 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

😍 Spannende Einblicke in die Gesichtserkennung Jeder kennt sie, die sprichwörtliche Liebe auf den ersten Blick oder die Faszination, die Fans beim Anblick eines Stars empfinden. Was wie Magie erscheint, hat in Wirklichkeit viel mit der Art zu tun, wie unser Gehirn Gesichter erkennt und verarbeitet. Gesichter sind so einzigartig wie ein Fingerabdruck. Unser Gehirn ist darauf spezialisiert, selbst kleinste Unterschie

👍139

11 May 2025, 18:43 UTC858 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Achtet mal auf diese Bereiche. Besonders die Mimische Muskulatur und der Schädel Muskelansatz. Das sind dominante genetische Faktoren.

👍212

11 May 2025, 18:16 UTC880 views23 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

85 Prozent. In einem anderen Zusammenhang und ohne die bekannten Hintergrundinformationen würde ich sagen: vermutlich verwandt. Es lassen sich einige interessante Merkmale erkennen, die theoretisch genetisch vererbbar sind. Eine genetisch bedingte Übereinstimmung erscheint hier wahrscheinlicher als bloßer Zufall auch wenn letzterer nicht völlig ausgeschlossen ist. Ich dachte, diese Information könnte für den einen od

👍23

15 Aug 2024, 12:59 UTC≈1,280 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Video

@unzensiert_infoseite Das ist der Typ, der Ihnen erzählt, dass MPOX ein globaler Notfall ist. 🥳 @unzensiert / @unzensiertV2

👍2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @super_rec. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 20 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Super Recognizer” (@super_rec), 820 subscribers as measured 20 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/super_rec.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.