3 measurements spanning 3 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,061–1,064 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
10 Aug 2026, 13:35
1,061
-3
8 Aug 2026, 00:17
1,064
no change
7 Aug 2026, 13:17
1,064
first reading
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 23 September 2024 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 23 September 2024. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Reaction mix
7 reactions across 3 posts, in 2 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 85.7% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
6
85.7%
👍
1
14.3%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 3 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 7reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 23 September 2024 to 23 September 2024, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
🔥New Sun Pump Token 🔥
🔗CA
TYqpAKiBsSytwxN95Z54SSUtboe451Htmg
👤 Creator:
TBQ28FcYmVNGmS87rj557RkAdJPD7CqvsC
Creator's Balance
45.4 TRX
🪙 OCTO OCTO
Socials:
Twitter:
Telegram:
Website: www.octo.com
📢 AD: You want an ad here? @monu_botdev
🔥New Sun Pump Token 🔥
🔗CA
TWdyGQ97qpZVRkviJgJXfWzFFqHbzpqpom
👤 Creator:
TNRg6necDnkJB4g2dttNhgemRr6a9gmAde
Creator's Balance
9.2 TRX
🪙 Election Vote Token VOTETOKEN
Socials:
Twitter:
Telegram:
Website:
📢 AD: You want an ad here? @monu_botdev
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @sunpumpnewtoken. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Mentions
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
Dead references
1
handles named in this channel’s posts, vacant today
Evidenced gone
0
we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
Never seen alive
1
vacant every time we have ever looked
@sunpumpnewtoken named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handle’s history — see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all.A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today — not that anything “died”. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel — we have no record it ever was one.
@monu_botdev named in 20 posts, 8 August 2026 – 8 August 2026
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Mr Banks Free Channel @MrBanksFreeChannel · 442,875 Telegram ranks this channel #38 of 88 here — alongside 87 others — read 11 August 2026
THE FLASH ⚡⚽️🏀 @the_flash101 · 183,138 Telegram ranks this channel #77 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 12 August 2026
BOOKIES NIGHTMARE 😱 @Ekiti1 · 200,282 Telegram ranks this channel #78 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 11 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 August 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Toogan Scan Bot- New Token 🔥” (@sunpumpnewtoken), 1,061 subscribers as measured 10 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sunpumpnewtoken.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.