Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram

Channel

Антиконференция Summer Merge

@summermerge

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

1,728subscribers

-3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001543224098
TypeChannel
Username@summermerge
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023— estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/summermerge

Growth

1,7281,7311,729.56 August 2026 — 1,731 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,731 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,728 subscribers6 August 202612 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 6 days, net -3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,728–1,731 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Aug 2026, 12:431,728-3
6 Aug 2026, 07:041,731no change
6 Aug 2026, 06:041,731first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 5 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
37.9%
avg views ÷ 1,728 subscribers
Avg views / post
654
3 posts measured
Reaction rate
3.77%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
3
of 8 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 27 July 2026
Posts held8 (5 July 202627 July 2026)
Views total1,963
Reactions total74
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken7 Aug 2026, 17:39 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
3m 43s
Average length
3m 43s

Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

207 reactions across 8 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥9847.3%
8139.1%
👏73.38%
😁52.42%
👍41.93%
🤝41.93%
💋31.45%
❤‍🔥20.966%
🗿10.483%
🙏10.483%
🤪10.483%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 207reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

27 Jul 2026, 16:40 UTC390 views35 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @mergecampPhoto

Ребята, привет. Хотим поговорить открыто. Мы приняли сложное, но осознанное решение: в этом году палаточный Merge Camp в августе не состоится. Мы всегда ставили перед собой планку — делать качественные события с той самой уникальной атмосферой и мощным нетворкингом. Но честно оценив ситуацию, мы поняли: прямо сейчас выдать стопроцентный уровень организации и контента не получится. Рынок диктует новые условия, и дел

29💋3❤‍🔥2🙏1

18 Jul 2026, 15:14 UTC996 views24 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ждете Summer Merge 2027?🔆 Мы — очень. Особенно в такие дни, когда за окном серое небо, холодный ветер и совсем не летний вайб. И, чтобы поднять всем нам настроение, мы решили поделиться новостью. Summer Merge 2027 состоится 2–4 июля. Да, ждать долго, но, чтобы хоть немного согреться теплыми воспоминаниями, мы запускаем акцию. 📸 Поделитесь в комментариях под этим постом вашим самым ярким и солнечным фото с любого

🔥24

17 Jul 2026, 14:58 UTC577 views15 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @Samara_IT_CommunityPhoto

Активисты SITC с ребятами из Пивного Четверга рванули на IT-фестиваль Summer Merge в Ульяновскую область с палатками, пауэрбанками и запасом Жигулевского (куда ж без него). Локация на берегу реки с хвойным лесом сразу задала настроение: доклады на свежем воздухе слушались на ура, активности радовали разнообразием — от сапов до кинотеатра под открытым небом, музыкальные группы заводили толпу, ну а ребята, и знакомые,

🔥15

8 Jul 2026, 18:33 UTC≈1,310 views36 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Ну, что, повторим? 😎 28–30 августа приглашаем всех проводить лето вместе с нами на Merge Camp. Если после Summer Merge вам показалось, что этих выходных было мало, если вы уже скучаете по вечерним разговорам у костра, песням под гитару, танцам до поздней ночи, утреннему кофе с видом на Волгу и той самой атмосфере летней сказки, то мы снова ждем вас в эко-парке «Русский Берег». Merge Camp — это камерное продолжение

🔥1710😁5👍2👏2

8 Jul 2026, 05:40 UTC983 views39 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Video

❤️Вспоминаем эти выходные и смотрим видео от участницы Summer Merge 2026 Напоминаем, что будем рады вашим отзывам здесь: summermerge.ru/feedback

🔥2514

7 Jul 2026, 18:29 UTC619 views16 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Forwarded from @yarushkina_comitetPhoto

Новая монография Надежды Глебовны Ярушкиной «Искусственный интеллект и семантическое обучение» вышла из печати и уже доступна читателям! Совсем недавно мы рассказывали о презентации книги, а теперь фундаментальная работа объёмом более 500 страниц уже издана и поступила в продажу. Монография посвящена современным подходам к развитию искусственного интеллекта и объединяет вопросы машинного обучения, инженерии знаний,

9👏4🔥3

6 Jul 2026, 18:09 UTC894 views12 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Оставьте отзыв о Summer Merge ❤️ Друзья, Summer Merge создаётся для вас, и нам искренне важно знать, каким он получился в этот раз. Поделитесь впечатлениями, заполнив короткую форму обратной связи. Это займёт всего несколько минут, а мы в ответ отправим вам презентации спикеров. 🔗 Ссылка на форму: summermerge.ru/feedback

🔥7🤝4🗿1

5 Jul 2026, 10:55 UTC≈1,060 views30 reactionsread 7 August 2026
Photo

Шестой Summer Merge завершился, но эмоции этих дней ещё долго будут звучать в нас🔥 Если вы снимали фото и видео — не держите их в телефоне. Делитесь вашими кадрами и впечатлениями в нашем чате или присылайте в личку @alex_merge Можно присылать ссылки на уже опубликованные посты, чтобы мы могли поделиться ими на наших площадках. Скоро разошлем и форму обратной связи. Традиционно всем оставившим отзыв вышлем презент

19🔥7👍2👏1🤪1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @summermerge. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 139,585 of 1,340,412entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Антиконференция Summer Merge” (@summermerge), 1,728 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/summermerge.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.