Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for sugarbone☠️

Channel

sugarbone☠️

@sugarboneshop

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

7,681subscribers

+1,417 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002761600500
TypeChannel
Username@sugarboneshop
Descriptionлс @sugarbonesh
CreatedBetween 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live9 November 2026
Measurements held27
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/sugarboneshop

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

6,1597,6816,9206 August 2026 — 6,264 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,309 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,790 subscribers12 August 2026 — 7,110 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,954 subscribers19 August 2026 — 7,083 subscribers22 August 2026 — 6,884 subscribers25 August 2026 — 6,810 subscribers28 August 2026 — 6,706 subscribers30 August 2026 — 6,715 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,638 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,536 subscribers13 September 2026 — 6,556 subscribers17 September 2026 — 6,497 subscribers25 September 2026 — 6,448 subscribers4 October 2026 — 6,341 subscribers11 October 2026 — 6,261 subscribers14 October 2026 — 6,241 subscribers17 October 2026 — 6,210 subscribers20 October 2026 — 6,185 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,159 subscribers25 October 2026 — 6,409 subscribers28 October 2026 — 6,814 subscribers31 October 2026 — 7,095 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,387 subscribers5 November 2026 — 7,501 subscribers9 November 2026 — 7,681 subscribers6 August 20269 November 2026
27 measurements spanning 94 days, net +1,417. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,931–7,909 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 27
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Nov 2026, 03:587,681+180
5 Nov 2026, 23:577,501+114
3 Nov 2026, 05:497,387+292
31 Oct 2026, 02:117,095+281
28 Oct 2026, 12:496,814+405
25 Oct 2026, 21:416,409+250
22 Oct 2026, 22:106,159-26
20 Oct 2026, 00:106,185-25
17 Oct 2026, 09:456,210-31
14 Oct 2026, 14:476,241-20
11 Oct 2026, 11:186,261-80
4 Oct 2026, 20:376,341-107
25 Sept 2026, 10:006,448-49
17 Sept 2026, 05:196,497-59
13 Sept 2026, 01:416,556+20
8 Sept 2026, 19:016,536-102
3 Sept 2026, 13:006,638-77
30 Aug 2026, 23:086,715+9
28 Aug 2026, 00:046,706-104
25 Aug 2026, 07:076,810first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 39 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
20.4%
avg views ÷ 7,681 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,570
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.93%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 13 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 11 November 2026
Posts held31 (4 August 2026 – 11 November 2026)
Views total21,938
Reactions total200
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken13 Nov 2026, 05:46 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈1,010
Videos
≈14
Links
≈4

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 13 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
34s
Average length
11s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

462 reactions across 30 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘22047.6%
👻13930.1%
💋10322.3%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 462 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 11 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 2 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (14.3%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

11 Nov 2026, 09:18 UTC435 viewsread 11 November 2026

сегодня последний день распродажи! 🌟

9 Nov 2026, 18:46 UTC473 views3 reactionsread 10 November 2026

только при заказе сегодня и завтра бесплатная доставка!🌟

💘3

9 Nov 2026, 18:45 UTC850 views4 reactionsread 11 November 2026
Photo

🌟 SALE POST 🌟 🪽(09.11-11.11)🪽 1) juicy couture puffer 9700 2) abercrombie jacket 3700 3) ed hardy puffer 9700 4) ed hardy flared 2700 5) ed hardy sweatpants 3700 6) ed hardy sweatpants 3700 7) juicy couture vintage 6700 8) ed hardy undershirt 1700 9) balenciaga city bag 12700 🌟@sugarbonesh

💘4

6 Nov 2026, 17:09 UTC≈1,740 views10 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

juicy couture original🌟 винтажный джуси костюмчик оригинал,баклажанного цвета,с золотистыми элементами ,короной, блестками size:m ,факт s price:6999 @sugarbonesh

👻5💘5

6 Nov 2026, 15:33 UTC≈1,550 views6 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

ed hardy original flared🌟 очень красивые клеши ед харди с кучей элементов,простреленных сердечек,надписей,супер идеальный клеш! size:26 price:3990 @sugarbonesh

💘6

5 Nov 2026, 19:54 UTC≈1,970 views30 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

курточка ед харди 🌟

💘20👻10

3 Nov 2026, 19:48 UTC≈2,170 views14 reactionsread 13 November 2026

🌟 клешики ед харди 🌟 нежно розовые ед харди 🌟 маечки ед харди 🌟 баленсиага сумочка

💘14

3 Nov 2026, 19:48 UTC≈2,060 views20 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

💘12👻8

3 Nov 2026, 12:18 UTC≈2,050 views13 reactionsread 13 November 2026
Photo

ed hardy pink undershirt🌟 очень красивый топ от ед харди с пантерой ,орлом и различными татуажными надписями size:s price:2200 @sugarbonesh

💋13

2 Nov 2026, 14:46 UTC≈1,770 views23 reactionsread 7 November 2026
Photo

к 2 первым заказам на все наличие,положу шортики ед харди в подарок🌟

👻23

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @sugarboneshop. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@sugarboneshop edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
11 November 2026
Most recent edit
11 November 2026

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 8 posts on @sugarboneshop as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
9 November 2026
Median time before seen missing
32 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
5

Mentions

Named by 44 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it. The 23 listed below are the most frequent namers; the rest are counted above but not each listed.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“sugarbone☠️” (@sugarboneshop), 7,681 subscribers as measured 9 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/sugarboneshop.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.