Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ΣU Projects

Channel

ΣU Projects

@su_Bots

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

288subscribers

+18 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001211169588
TypeChannel
Username@su_Bots
CreatedBetween 1 March 2018 and 3 February 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 October 2026
Last confirmed live9 October 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 9 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/su_Bots

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 8 October 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 73% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

269288278.57 August 2026 — 270 subscribers15 August 2026 — 269 subscribers22 August 2026 — 271 subscribers30 August 2026 — 276 subscribers6 September 2026 — 280 subscribers15 September 2026 — 281 subscribers29 September 2026 — 286 subscribers8 October 2026 — 286 subscribers9 October 2026 — 288 subscribers7 August 20269 October 2026
9 measurements spanning 63 days, net +18. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 266–291 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
9 Oct 2026, 06:37288+2
8 Oct 2026, 07:22286no change
29 Sept 2026, 14:55286+5
15 Sept 2026, 07:17281+1
6 Sept 2026, 15:16280+4
30 Aug 2026, 05:06276+5
22 Aug 2026, 20:33271+2
15 Aug 2026, 14:44269-1
7 Aug 2026, 05:07270first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 3 February 2021 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 October 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

24 reactions across 5 posts, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍24100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 6 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 24 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2021 to 11 October 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

11 Oct 2023, 15:13 UTCviews —

ΣU Projects pinned «Made most of current ΣU Projects' code public. Find them in the official GitHub Organization Repository of ΣU Projects. We (Alpha) currently have no plans to work on the existing bots adding features, bringing them online, or developing any new projects.…»

11 Oct 2023, 15:12 UTC≈3,690 views3 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Made most of current ΣU Projects' code public. Find them in the official GitHub Organization Repository of ΣU Projects. We (Alpha) currently have no plans to work on the existing bots adding features, bringing them online, or developing any new projects. Though the ΣU Community and bots have been dead for about 2 years now, I guess is about time to make it official. Guess this marks the end of ΣU Projects. Thank yo…

👍3

Signed Alpha

24 Apr 2022, 16:23 UTC≈7,110 views9 reactionsread 8 October 2026

#AFK_Robot Made the old version of @AFK_Robot public, you can use it in your projects. Made using Python with PTB and sqlalchemy Credits: @su_Theta https://github.com/suprojects/afk-bot

👍9

Signed Alpha

16 Apr 2022, 16:51 UTC≈5,860 views8 reactionsread 8 October 2026

#AFK_Robot Fully reworked @AFK_Robot Completely rewritten the code, now based on Pyrogram and MongoDB. Includes media support, and all the previous features, along with last seen viewer, mention logger, /settings to configure your group's and private settings, group message auto deletion, and more. Check it out @AFK_Robot

👍8

Signed Alpha

21 Jun 2021, 15:12 UTC≈5,780 viewsread 8 October 2026

#MassActionBot @MassActionBot banned. Sorry guys.

Signed Alpha

19 Jun 2021, 05:24 UTC≈4,920 viewsread 8 October 2026

🎉 2000 @Memeing_Bot users. Thank you for the support 🎉

Signed Alpha

3 Apr 2021, 13:36 UTC≈4,860 viewsread 8 October 2026

#ThankStickerBot 🛑 Stopped @ThankStickerBot due to DB issues. It will be resumed shortly ▶️. Sorry to say that it cannot be fixed right now 😔.

Signed Alpha

23 Mar 2021, 16:42 UTC≈4,400 viewsread 8 October 2026

ΣU Bots' support frozen till end of May 🥶. New bots, updates and support will be resumed by the 1st week of June ▶️.

Signed Alpha

18 Mar 2021, 13:28 UTC≈4,270 views0 reactionsread 8 October 2026

Updates 🔄: • CallsMusic is dead, much like the legacy VoiceChatPyroBot. • No more Open-sourced projects from ΣU. • No more bots related to Telegram Voice Chats from ΣU.

Signed Alpha

4 Mar 2021, 14:09 UTC≈4,620 viewsread 8 October 2026
Video

✨ Thank you very much for a family of 500! We hope that you had and will have a really good time with us!

Signed Theta

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @su_Bots. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Feb 2021, 04:08 UTCFinal Results162 voters

How would you prefer to host the Voice Chat Music Bot 🎶?

  1. I use a userbot but prefer to host a separate bot for music 💰18%
  2. A Plugin in the userbot 🔌46%
  3. I don't use a userbot and wish to host a separate bot for music 🤖36%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 3 February 2021 to 11 October 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ΣU Projects” (@su_Bots), 288 subscribers as measured 9 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/su_Bots.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.