Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝗦𝗛‘𝗧𝗣𝗒𝗦𝗧 π—Ÿπ—”π—­π—’π—‘.

Channel

𝗦𝗛‘𝗧𝗣𝗒𝗦𝗧 π—Ÿπ—”π—­π—’π—‘.

@stylolzn

On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· What this channel posts Β· Reactions Β· Posts Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry

29subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001758168633
TypeChannel
Username@stylolzn
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023β€” estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded11 August 2026
Last confirmed live15 August 2026
Measurements held3
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 15 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/stylolzn

Growth

293029.56 August 2026 β€” 30 subscribers11 August 2026 β€” 30 subscribers15 August 2026 β€” 29 subscribers6 August 202615 August 2026
3 measurements spanning 8 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between β€” snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean β€œno change observed”, never β€œinterpolated”. The vertical axis spans 29–30 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log β€” every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
15 Aug 2026, 00:1529-1
11 Aug 2026, 04:0130no change
6 Aug 2026, 22:4230first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 5 October 2023 β€” the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 pageof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β€” we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 March 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
38s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel β€” not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no β‰ˆ mark.

Reaction mix

13 reactions across 2 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🐳538.5%
❀430.8%
πŸ”₯323.1%
πŸ‘Ž17.69%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities β€” πŸ™ is thanks in one channel and mourning in another β€” so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one β€” 4.34K, 1.2M β€” so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 2 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post β€” not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above β€” those same posts carry 13reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by β€œa reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 5 October 2023 to 16 March 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

16 Mar 2025, 15:07 UTC41 viewsread 11 August 2026

hello @durov i would like to convey that, there is no action that violates the terms and conditions of telegram here, i hope, telegram has a wise way, in managing problems, before doing strict action, such as banning/blocking a telegram channel, thank you

18 Oct 2023, 15:44 UTC266 views9 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

γ…€γ…€β™‘ ❍ ⌲ β€’β€’ βŽ™ Liked by @ZONANUESTRAZ and 937.285.538 othersγ…€ @NingYizhuo_q we’re having so much fun! πŸ€— π“ˆpecial 𝓉ag : @Tag_sukaya @thissazuraa @kithrenjunie @Chaercharie @gooyjng @jrhansohee @xowssie @sPENTOLW @.arcery @sGentelman πŸ’¬ view all 6.097.356 comments 18 October β€’ see translation ─────────────────── βŒ‚ βŒ• ⊞ β™‘

🐳5πŸ”₯2❀1πŸ‘Ž1

10 Oct 2023, 11:08 UTC214 views4 reactionsread 11 August 2026
Photo

😈 . special tag's : @xShiro . @igirnd . @Thissazurra . @gooyjng @sGentelman . @IrTiongkok . @bluenki

❀3πŸ”₯1

10 Oct 2023, 11:08 UTC181 viewsread 11 August 2026

🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩🚩

10 Oct 2023, 11:07 UTC175 viewsread 11 August 2026
Photo

Spesial tag : @Chaercharie @kithrenjunie @RethaWtnbe @igirnd @IrTiongkok @iu17ei

6 Oct 2023, 11:37 UTC164 viewsread 11 August 2026

dedey kenapa

Signed 𝐀zura intiᢻ⁷³ α΅€α΄³α΄°Β°α΄Ήα΄Ήα΄·

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @stylolzn. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β‰ˆ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β€” t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β‰ˆ1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason β€” naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides β€” the β€œNamed by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 August 2026 β€” this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

β€œπ—¦π—›Β‘π—§π—£π—’π—¦π—§ π—Ÿπ—”π—­π—’π—‘.” (@stylolzn), 29 subscribers as measured 15 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/stylolzn.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.